![]() |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member |
I captured this on the weekend. Enjoy:
__________________ Si vis pacem, para bellum!!!!!!! Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes |
| |
| | #2 |
| Junior Member |
My best guess was it was landing and where was this at. Very cool video and looks like you were very close.
|
| |
| | #3 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 153
|
...uh...was that intentional or just a near miss?
__________________ I'm on a Plane...I can't complain - Kurt Cobain |
| |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member |
Well since I know your in San Diego, im guessing its headed for Miramar?
|
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 995
| "Near Miss"? Please...that's not even close to being inside the "well clear" distance of 500 feet.
__________________ Trains were meant to be strafed. 0100011000101101001100010011010101000101 |
| |
| | #6 |
| Junior Member |
He was landing at North Island. It wasn't that close. I guess the interent adds 15 feet.
__________________ Si vis pacem, para bellum!!!!!!! Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes |
| |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 1,350
|
It does seem closer if you're not accustomed to seeing stuff like this.
|
| |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 995
| It's the same thing that drove that PC-12 pilot out in Phoenix to claim that the F-16s were 10 feet off his wing or something.
__________________ Trains were meant to be strafed. 0100011000101101001100010011010101000101 |
| |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 1,350
|
Yup.
|
| |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Diego
Posts: 417
|
Those guys love to mess with GA a/c around here. Especially if you're around an MOA. Great vid! You had to have been pretty quick on the draw to get your phone out fast enough! (assuming you taped this with your phone.) |
| |
| | #11 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: NY, IN
Posts: 178
| Agreed; today at a non-towered airport south of a MOA my student and I were minding our own business in the pattern and an F-16 buzzed over us at about 500' (just a guess) with the burners on. Awesome!
|
| |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 995
| The last time I checked, F-16s have only one engine.
__________________ Trains were meant to be strafed. 0100011000101101001100010011010101000101 |
| |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 1,350
|
Nah, last time I checked, F-16s have five engines... maybe six?
|
| |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 995
| Outside of the PW-220 or the GE-129 (whichever it happens to be equipped with), none of the others you're referring to have "burners".
__________________ Trains were meant to be strafed. 0100011000101101001100010011010101000101 |
| |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 1,350
|
What? I was only kidding.
|
| |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 995
| The Viper does, technically, have several other "engines" on board -- the EPU, for example.
__________________ Trains were meant to be strafed. 0100011000101101001100010011010101000101 |
| |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 1,350
|
Okay, I see where you're going with this. What I was referring to was the turbofan jet engine that the F-16 has. I said it had five or six of them because I was being stupid. When amd87 said "burners", he was referring to the F-16's one jet engine. The "engines" that you're talking about are the other systems that provide power to various systems on the F-16, such as the EPU that you mentioned, which uses a gas turbine powered by the engine bleed air or by hot gases generated by decomposition of hydrazine, which then drives the emergency electricity generator and the emergency hydraulic pump. So you see where one could get confused. |
| |
| | #18 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 995
|
I'm not confused. I was originally just pointing out in the original post that he said "burners", yet there's only one engine on the airplane that even has one. It was more a poke at the single-engine vs two-engine rivalry between the F-15 and F-16 in the USAF. You said as a joke that there were five or six, and I admitted that it's true that there are several smaller engines on board the jet. That simple.
__________________ Trains were meant to be strafed. 0100011000101101001100010011010101000101 |
| |
| | #19 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 1,350
|
I was confused. You admitted that it's true that there are several smaller engines on board the jet. But I was not talking about those engines. I said that there were five or six jet engines, you know, the things that have a "burner". The F-16 obviously has only one. I just wasn't sure whether or not you knew which engines I was talking about when I made that stupid joke, that's all. |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |