![]() | |
| | #26 | |
| Forum K9: Bark and Bite | Quote:
![]() "Zapped the hell out of that plane..." That's awesome!
__________________ Woof, woof!! | |
| |
| | #27 |
| Newbie Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Earth
Posts: 26
|
Anyone been to El Paso? It's been a long time for me but my first time there I thought I was seeing double. There's almost a duplicate airport a few miles to the north I believe. A military base from what I remember. It would be soooo easy to screw up and land there.
|
| |
| | #28 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: KELP
Posts: 807
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #29 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Korea
Posts: 103
|
Don't forget Ellsworth AFB and Rapid City Regional Airport....yes NWA mistakenly landed at Ellsworth a few years ago. He was on the VOR approach to 14 at RAP, broke out of the clouds and saw a runway and landed. The final approach course for that approach goes right over the base.
__________________ "Two things make an airplane fly: airspeed and money" |
| |
| | #30 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 88
|
We have a similar situation where I'm at with an closed AFB near the airport with the same runway layout. If we see an aircraft headed to that airport we say something like "it appears your heading to the closed AFB". That has happened twice with an airline when I was working. I also had a citation coming from a direction where he looked like he was coming to the airport but would be overflying the closed AFB. I got a confused, "ah, approach?" "I am lining up for the runway in front of me, but my GPS shows I am still 14 miles from the airport." DING DING DING! That's the first clue. If you have the equipment to verify USE IT! If something doesn't look right, ASK!
|
| |
| | #31 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 63
|
I was flying into a small uncontrolled Army Air Field Near Boston many many years ago... we had to shoot this vor approach to get in.... ON the final approach dourse several miles short of the AAF is another smallish muni airport with the same runway layout... we even commented that night as we were shooting the approach that it would be possible to screw that up if you didnt keep good SA. Low and behold in the ops building at said AAF there was a notice on a board there with a notice about the similiar looking airfield. The ops guy told us ( this was 1988 ) that several years earlier a 130 crew had indeed landed there then took off and came on over. I have no idea what the result of all that was but it probably wasnt not good.
|
| |
| | #32 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 301
|
One of our local controllers used to work at SFO Tower and said that the chain of airports south of SFO caused a lot of mixed approaches. They had phones that were direct lines to the other tower so they could call and check if they had an extra plane in the pattern.
__________________ "I wish people would stop using "national security" when they mean "fear" or "downright stupidity"." - Chief Captain If you're not cheating, you're not trying |
| |
| | #33 | |
| Banned | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #34 |
| Newbie Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15
|
Not to be a Monday morning quarterback or anything because I can see it how it can happen at some locations. All of the airports I fly to have an ILS or a localizer approach. I always, always use that for every approach mainly because I'm just to lazy to look out the window until short final. The localizer always takes me to the correct runway at the correct airport. I've flown to El Paso many, many times and I couldn't point out the AFB to you if you paid me and the same with all the airports around SFO. I see so many of my fellow pilots craning their necks looking for the runway and turning off all of the automation when cleared for a visual. I never look for the runway. I just follow the purple line on the EHSI or the flight director in a hardball panel and it always leads me to the right place. Gives me altitudes and speeds as well! So not to criticize because it can happen. But I've been flying for 35 years and I have yet to land at the wrong airport but I can see how it can happen. That's why I always, always use everything I have in the cockpit to point me to the right place. Looking out the windows is a pointless exercise. |
| |
| | #35 |
| Senior Member | |
| |
| | #36 |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2006 Location: Live in Arlington, TX - From Ithaca, NY - Wish I was on an island in Fiji
Posts: 2,520
|
This is funny stuff. I had no idea how prevalent this kind of mistake could be. Is it really that easy to land at the wrong airport?
|
| |
| | #37 |
| Newbie Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15
| Especially on a visual. Usually. At my airline we are required to brief at least the basics of the instrument approach when it is a visual. What nav-aids we will be using, etc. It has been my experience that guys doing a purely visual without using the backup instruments will almost always screw it up. They'll get too low or high, slow or fast without at least trying to hit the already established points on a published approach. Another anecdote and why I never do a pure visual unless it is the last resort; when I was an F/O we were going into LAX late one night. We were doing the visual to 24R and 24L was closed for construction so all the lights were out on that runway. The captain had the ILS tuned up, the flight director on and everything else that we always do. But he lined up on the public street that runs parallel to 24R because he was so used to seeing two sets of lights and that road looks just like a runway from a few miles out. I told him he was right of course, the ILS was showing right of course and the flight director was commanding a left turn. All of that still didn't give him a clue. He insisted he was lined up perfectly for 24R. So we kept going for that road and I again told him he was lined up on a road to the north of the airport. He insisted I was wrong. I asked him to look at his ILS and FD and trust them and not his eyes. By that time we were on about a 1 mile final and he finally decided that maybe he was confused. On about a 1/2 mile final he finally saw the runway and the road became obvious. He was looking out the window the whole time. I was looking inside the whole time. That's why I don't look out the window. Same with traffic most of the time. The TCAS sees the traffic long before I ever can and it gives me altitude and distance on the scope on the panel. My eyes aren't that good. Every time I have been the non flying pilot and we get a traffic resolution I have had to assertively command the flying pilot to follow the directions the TCAS is exhorting. They always say they see it but I say that what they are looking at might not be the problem traffic. Of course, there are always exceptions and I do use my eyes and look outside and double check everything but the information presented inside the cockpit is almost always more accurate than your eyes. I trust that stuff when I'm IMC and on CAT III approaches so why wouldn't I trust it when it is visual? If you use what you have in the cockpit and have it set up right it will always take you to where you want to go. I use my outside visual cues as a backup and not a primary source of information. |
| |
| | #38 |
| Old Skool | Yup.
__________________ |
| |
| | #39 |
| Agent Smith | Oh hell yes. I did a sweet visual approach to Offut AFB one day until the controller insisted I join the LOC at Omaha.
__________________ Doug Taylor aviationcareerexpo.com |
| |
| | #40 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
-Rob
__________________ What have you done lately to better your career? | |
| |
| | #41 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
-Rob
__________________ What have you done lately to better your career? | |
| |
| | #42 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
__________________ "The Coconut Banger's Ball... Its A Rap" | |
| |
| | #43 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
We flew into Mexico, but we where vectored into it. -Rob
__________________ What have you done lately to better your career? | |
| |
| | #44 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
__________________ "The Coconut Banger's Ball... Its A Rap" | |
| |
| | #45 |
| Old Skool | Funniest time ever was when we went to starbucks and he and the coffee maker person where going back and forth about their favorite type of coffee ice cream, and how the ones with whipped cream and cherry where the best. So gay but so funny. -Rob
__________________ What have you done lately to better your career? |
| |
| | #46 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________ "The Coconut Banger's Ball... Its A Rap" | |
| |
| | #47 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #48 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: aviation career purgatory
Posts: 329
|
I'd definitely tell somebody. if it's a minor mistake, it may be easier / better to just hide it, but something as obvious as landing a big jet at the wrong airport is bound to be seen by somebody, even if it is at 4am. If you confess, you may keep your job. If you wait for somebody else to tell the chief pilot, you will lose your job.
|
| |
| | #49 |
| Old Skool | Yep... On my Upgrade OE... while flying with a VERY senior Check Airman (No. 2 on the seniority list in CLE) we almost set up for a wonderful visual pattern to Plattsburg (PBG)... when we should have been a bit further southeast in Burlington (BTV). My checkairman was also adamant that one guy always fly green needles (VOR nav) and have his bearing pointers up... while the other guy should have his magenta (FMS/GPS) needles up. You know... so that we could cross check each other... and not make mistakes. ![]() It was late at night... end of a long day... VMC... we were on a heading for vectors to the visual... he called the airport "in sight" while pointing out the window. I looked out and immediately saw an airport and I agreed... "in sight". We had everything set up for the visual backed up by the ILS. But... by golly we had "the" airport "in sight" and it wasn't until we were practically midfield downwind of PBG that I realized that BTV was actually behind and to the right of us. We then started our 15 mile out "base turn to final" for BTV... right as Center called us to confirm we actually had BTV in sight and not PBG. We just acknowledged that we had BTV in sight... but needed a bit of extra time to set up for the approach and that was the reason for the "extended downwind". ![]() Moral... Man, I can see how easy it could've happened. Bob
__________________ My head is in the clouds and my heart is still in Maine... but my devotion and love belong to my wife and children. New Pics as of 4/09! |
| |
| | #50 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: KELP
Posts: 807
|
Camp Humphreys in Korea was just south of Osan- the control zones overlap. Runways were oriented the same direction. I was there when the ILS was first commissioned at Camp Humphreys in the late 1980s. The frequency was only like .2 different from Osans localizer (one was something like 111.1, the other 111.3. The IDs were similar... especially to crews flying C-5s from the US. Only problem was that Humphreys was like 5,000', Osan was something like 15,000' (don't remember the exact numbers, but Osan is LONG). One night while flying NVGs in the pattern at Humphreys we were turning base when a C-5 flew by us on final... not talking to tower. Yeah, they were tracking a perfect localizer... to the wrong airport. I guess they realized it at the last minute when the runway looked kind of short... and dark... and did a go around. Shocked the &^%$ out of us and the tower controller. Tower came back in a few minutes and told us what they did. I'd like to say I would never have done it... but being tired after a long flight... IDs are close... frequencies are almost the same (is that a 1 or a 3?)... runways alined... a dark night... |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |