jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > Flight Training > Collegiate Aviation > University of North Dakota

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 28th, 2007, 00:50   #1
TXaviator
Old Skool
 
TXaviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARB - in a backpack
Posts: 2,471
Send a message via AIM to TXaviator Send a message via MSN to TXaviator Send a message via Yahoo to TXaviator
Default 6 elements of stabilized approach???

uhhhhh? anyone?

apparently i need to knwo this for a stage check tommorrow.

my elements are:

on course
not doing zany ####
configured
cleared

.....thats all i can think of
__________________
CPL AMEL-I
250 TT / 25 ME
...and a *YOB.

1st Place - Sportsman - Doug Yost Aerobatic Contest
2nd Place - Sportsman - Illinois State Open
Best 1st Time Sportsman - Midwest Aerobatic Challenge

TXaviator is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 00:58   #2
JaceTheAce
Old Skool
 
JaceTheAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 7,624
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

All flights must be stabilized by 1,000 feet above airport elevation in IMC and by 500 feet above airport elevation in VMC. An approach is stabilized when all of the following criteria are met:
  1. The aircraft is on the correct flight path;
  2. Only small changes in heading/pitch are required to maintain the correct flight path;
  3. The aircraft speed is not more than Vref + 20 KIAS and not less than Vref;
  4. Sink rate is no greater than 1,000 fpm. If an approach requires a sink rate greater than 1,000 fpm, a special briefing should be conducted;
  5. Power setting is appropriate for the air craft configuration and is not below the minimum power for approach as described by the aircraft operating manual;
  6. All briefings and checklists have been conducted.
...I believe that's what it is. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________
"Time spent flying is not deducted from one's lifespan."



JaceTheAce is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 00:59   #3
Minuteman
Old Skool
 
Minuteman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,615
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Minuteman
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

On a transport-sized airpa-ma-plane, for example:
  • Aligned with Runway (±2 dots or so)
  • On Glidepath (±2 dots or VASI)
  • Vref+5 plus half the steady headwind plus full gust (-0 knots to +10 knots of that)
  • Landing gear down by 1000' AFE (or outer marker)
  • Configued by 500' AFE for visual, 1000' AFE for instrument approach
  • Engines spooled to approach idle
  • No speedbrakes needed below 1000' AFE
  • Uh, yeah, and cleared.

Aww poop.
Minuteman is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 01:06   #4
UAL747400
Old Skool
 
UAL747400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Grand Forks, ND (UND)/ Davenport, IA
Posts: 2,204
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by TXaviator View Post
not doing zany ####
HAHA, I'm using that on my stage check in CFII!! Heck, I'll use it if it comes up during the hiring workshop this summer too. They'd be like, "mother of god, make this guy the chief flight instructor right now!!". haha
__________________
UAL747400 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 01:11   #5
TXaviator
Old Skool
 
TXaviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARB - in a backpack
Posts: 2,471
Send a message via AIM to TXaviator Send a message via MSN to TXaviator Send a message via Yahoo to TXaviator
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

well i mean its like when in class they ask stuff that just seems SO OBVIOUS

ie "how do you do a visual approach"

i raised my hand and said "push the f&cking yoke in and aim at the runway"
__________________
CPL AMEL-I
250 TT / 25 ME
...and a *YOB.

1st Place - Sportsman - Doug Yost Aerobatic Contest
2nd Place - Sportsman - Illinois State Open
Best 1st Time Sportsman - Midwest Aerobatic Challenge

TXaviator is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 01:20   #6
UAL747400
Old Skool
 
UAL747400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Grand Forks, ND (UND)/ Davenport, IA
Posts: 2,204
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Oh I know exactly what you mean. I just like the way you put it.
__________________
UAL747400 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 01:56   #7
MrLeisure757
Senior Member
 
MrLeisure757's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
Posts: 754
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

I was asked that on my 112 checkride a few weeks ago. I remembered it this way....

FLAPS CHECK (√ )

Flight Path (Correct)
Landing Configuration (Correct)
Airspeed (Proper)
Power Set (Appropriate for Aircraft Configuration)
Sink Rate (Not abnormal)
Checklists complete.


Hope that helps.
MrLeisure757 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 02:16   #8
JaceTheAce
Old Skool
 
JaceTheAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 7,624
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLeisure757 View Post
I was asked that on my 112 checkride a few weeks ago. I remembered it this way....

FLAPS CHECK (√ )

Flight Path (Correct)
Landing Configuration (Correct)
Airspeed (Proper)
Power Set (Appropriate for Aircraft Configuration)
Sink Rate (Not abnormal)
Checklists complete.


Hope that helps.
ÕMĢ, ђόш đĩđ ŷōũ måķê ţĥǻť ŝŷmbộl Mister Leisure?
__________________
"Time spent flying is not deducted from one's lifespan."



JaceTheAce is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 02:25   #9
TXaviator
Old Skool
 
TXaviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARB - in a backpack
Posts: 2,471
Send a message via AIM to TXaviator Send a message via MSN to TXaviator Send a message via Yahoo to TXaviator
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLeisure757 View Post
I was asked that on my 112 checkride a few weeks ago. I remembered it this way....

FLAPS CHECK (√ )

Flight Path (Correct)
Landing Configuration (Correct)
Airspeed (Proper)
Power Set (Appropriate for Aircraft Configuration)
Sink Rate (Not abnormal)
Checklists complete.


Hope that helps.
perfect thanks.

yeah i heard this is some new thing theyre supposed to ask on all stage checks now.........but a lot of us were obviously not briefed on this.....
__________________
CPL AMEL-I
250 TT / 25 ME
...and a *YOB.

1st Place - Sportsman - Doug Yost Aerobatic Contest
2nd Place - Sportsman - Illinois State Open
Best 1st Time Sportsman - Midwest Aerobatic Challenge

TXaviator is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 02:36   #10
Dugie8
Old Skool
 
Dugie8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: KRST
Posts: 1,819
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

6 elements? WTFO?

On speed
Configed
Sink < 1000 below 1000 AGL


Nuff said.

Configed takes care of all checklists, no need to reinvent the wheel here.
__________________
Aircraft without engine(s) prohibited...

-KMIA 10-9
Dugie8 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 02:43   #11
Snickersnwa
Senior Member
 
Snickersnwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: GFK/MSP
Posts: 695
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

I believe we were told that (1) elements describing a stabilized approach, (2) determining crosswind components, and (3) discussing personal weather minimums are supposed to be on every check from 102 through MEI...
Snickersnwa is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 02:53   #12
TXaviator
Old Skool
 
TXaviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARB - in a backpack
Posts: 2,471
Send a message via AIM to TXaviator Send a message via MSN to TXaviator Send a message via Yahoo to TXaviator
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snickersnwa View Post
I believe we were told that (1) elements describing a stabilized approach, (2) determining crosswind components, and (3) discussing personal weather minimums are supposed to be on every check from 102 through MEI...

hell. i hadnt heard about 2 and 3 yet. just that the six elements of a stabilized approach are like required now (as in, along with vspeeds and emergencies, etc)
__________________
CPL AMEL-I
250 TT / 25 ME
...and a *YOB.

1st Place - Sportsman - Doug Yost Aerobatic Contest
2nd Place - Sportsman - Illinois State Open
Best 1st Time Sportsman - Midwest Aerobatic Challenge

TXaviator is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 02:54   #13
TXaviator
Old Skool
 
TXaviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARB - in a backpack
Posts: 2,471
Send a message via AIM to TXaviator Send a message via MSN to TXaviator Send a message via Yahoo to TXaviator
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dugie8 View Post
6 elements? WTFO?

On speed
Configed
Sink < 1000 below 1000 AGL


Nuff said.

Configed takes care of all checklists, no need to reinvent the wheel here.
yeah i tend to agree. its kindof restating the OBVIOUS.

duh, im on an approach, OBVIOUSLY im monitoring and staying on the prescribed course.

stuff like that bugs me. if it slips your mind that you need to be following a course while on an approach, you have no business flying approaches.
__________________
CPL AMEL-I
250 TT / 25 ME
...and a *YOB.

1st Place - Sportsman - Doug Yost Aerobatic Contest
2nd Place - Sportsman - Illinois State Open
Best 1st Time Sportsman - Midwest Aerobatic Challenge

TXaviator is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 03:01   #14
Snickersnwa
Senior Member
 
Snickersnwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: GFK/MSP
Posts: 695
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snickersnwa View Post
I believe we were told that (1) elements describing a stabilized approach, (2) determining crosswind components, and (3) discussing personal weather minimums are supposed to be on every check from 102 through MEI...
I *think* if I remember correctly, it was brought up in an ops meeting. We were told to discuss this with our students.
Snickersnwa is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 03:09   #15
Dugie8
Old Skool
 
Dugie8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: KRST
Posts: 1,819
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by TXaviator View Post
yeah i tend to agree. its kindof restating the OBVIOUS.

duh, im on an approach, OBVIOUSLY im monitoring and staying on the prescribed course.

stuff like that bugs me. if it slips your mind that you need to be following a course while on an approach, you have no business flying approaches.

This is an area UND has dropped the ball in. I don't recall if you have flown the SEMI yet or not, but the engine failure after liftoff checklist is a prime example. Elements about flying the airplane DO NOT belong in an emergency checklist, ie establish a 5 degree bank, rudder, etc.

A stabalized approach is more than just flying the needles centered, I can fly an ILS perfectly centered and not be stabilized (inverted, sever side slip, and so on). The premise of a stablized approach is having the airplane under "control" by a pre determined point (usually 1000 AGL IMC or 500 AGL VMC) to make the go around decision a little bit less "ambiguous".

I am sure we have all done it and rushed an approach and just barely pulled out a landing that would make a Navy pilot blush. The whole point is to take out the "machoism" and insert a level of safety that keeps us out of trouble. If it aint' stable by X amount of feet above the ground, go around and try it again.

Preaching elements that include basic airmenship is not the point.
__________________
Aircraft without engine(s) prohibited...

-KMIA 10-9
Dugie8 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 08:59   #16
Westcoaster
Newbie
 
Westcoaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: RIC
Posts: 7
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by TXaviator View Post
perfect thanks.

yeah i heard this is some new thing theyre supposed to ask on all stage checks now.........but a lot of us were obviously not briefed on this.....
It is in every standardization manual (and possibly the policies and procedures).

Proper config
Position to land
Airspeed
No excessive sink rate
Appropriate power setting
Final Check
Westcoaster is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 10:46   #17
SteveC
Ameliorator
 
SteveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: GRR
Posts: 8,871
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

add:

7. Verify engine operating.
8. Cross check blue up, green down.
9. Maintain appendages on flight controls as appropriate.

__________________
.


If life gives you lemons, throw 'em into a quart of vodka. ~Red Green
SteveC is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 16:04   #18
TXaviator
Old Skool
 
TXaviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ARB - in a backpack
Posts: 2,471
Send a message via AIM to TXaviator Send a message via MSN to TXaviator Send a message via Yahoo to TXaviator
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

ok well i got it today and spaced out on the

"power set" portion

i countered with

ok well, if your airspeed is appropriate, and your sink rate is appropriate, doesnt it NATURALLY FOLLOW that your power has already been set correctly???
...
10. eyes looking at instruments
11. wings still attached to plane
12. sitting in seat

etc etc
__________________
CPL AMEL-I
250 TT / 25 ME
...and a *YOB.

1st Place - Sportsman - Doug Yost Aerobatic Contest
2nd Place - Sportsman - Illinois State Open
Best 1st Time Sportsman - Midwest Aerobatic Challenge

TXaviator is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 19:03   #19
UAL747400
Old Skool
 
UAL747400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Grand Forks, ND (UND)/ Davenport, IA
Posts: 2,204
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

.....
13-at least one of your hands on the yoke
14-facing forward
15-door shut
16-check to make sure you haven't urinated or crapped your pants
........
__________________
UAL747400 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 19:58   #20
BuickCFI
Old Skool
 
BuickCFI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South of the Border
Posts: 2,132
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

17. still buckled
18. gear still welded on if flying a WARR
19. Stage check pilots mouth duck taped shut

Quote:
ok well, if your airspeed is appropriate, and your sink rate is appropriate, doesnt it NATURALLY FOLLOW that your power has already been set correctly???
no
__________________
CFI, CFII, MEI
-Why is it when two planes almost hit each other it is called a near miss? Shouldn't it be called a near hit?
BuickCFI is online now  
Old March 28th, 2007, 20:02   #21
juxtapilot
Senior Member
 
juxtapilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 1,084
Send a message via AIM to juxtapilot Send a message via MSN to juxtapilot Send a message via Skype™ to juxtapilot
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by TXaviator View Post
uhhhhh? anyone?

apparently i need to knwo this for a stage check tommorrow.

my elements are:

on course
not doing zany ####
configured
cleared

.....thats all i can think of

Uftah.. I think there was a pretty nifty Aerospace Podcast titled stablized approaches sooh you might take a look at that.
juxtapilot is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 20:04   #22
juxtapilot
Senior Member
 
juxtapilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 1,084
Send a message via AIM to juxtapilot Send a message via MSN to juxtapilot Send a message via Skype™ to juxtapilot
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuickCFI View Post
17. still buckled
18. gear still welded on if flying a WARR
19. Stage check pilots mouth duck taped shut



no
Don't ya need to say "Gear down and locked?" I think I remembered seeing that somewheres...
juxtapilot is offline  
Old March 28th, 2007, 20:07   #23
BuickCFI
Old Skool
 
BuickCFI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South of the Border
Posts: 2,132
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by juxtapilot View Post
Don't ya need to say "Gear down and locked?" I think I remembered seeing that somewheres...
i never UNsatted for saying "gear down, welded" when flying the WARR or WARG
__________________
CFI, CFII, MEI
-Why is it when two planes almost hit each other it is called a near miss? Shouldn't it be called a near hit?
BuickCFI is online now  
Old March 28th, 2007, 20:45   #24
UAL747400
Old Skool
 
UAL747400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Grand Forks, ND (UND)/ Davenport, IA
Posts: 2,204
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuickCFI View Post
i never UNsatted for saying "gear down, welded" when flying the WARR or WARG
I say that all the time just to be smartass. haha Haven't had anyone get bent out of shape yet. I'm sure I'll get some tight wad someday that will accuse me off mocking UND policies and procedures and distract me enough to cause us to crash.
__________________
UAL747400 is offline  
Old March 29th, 2007, 00:12   #25
BuickCFI
Old Skool
 
BuickCFI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South of the Border
Posts: 2,132
Default Re: 6 elements of stabilized approach???

Quote:
Originally Posted by UAL747400 View Post
I say that all the time just to be smartass. haha Haven't had anyone get bent out of shape yet. I'm sure I'll get some tight wad someday that will accuse me off mocking UND policies and procedures and distract me enough to cause us to crash.
my first instructor taught me to say that................
__________________
CFI, CFII, MEI
-Why is it when two planes almost hit each other it is called a near miss? Shouldn't it be called a near hit?
BuickCFI is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2008 jetcareers.com