1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Dear Visitor, registration is absolutely FREE!

    You can also start your membership quickly by using the "Login with Facebook" for fast registration!

    Get access to our live chat, members-only jobs section and more, today!
  3. Tune in AGAIN and watch Mike Lewis (Moderator) on Jeopardy! $35,000 first day winnings! Friday, May 24th!

Holding: When to start time outbound?

Discussion in 'CFI Corner' started by wayne09, Dec 31, 2011.

  1. wayne09 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2011
    Message Count:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Two questions to the forum please.
    To simplify our discussion, let's focus on VOR holding only whereby abeam position is always identifiable.

    (a) when do we start outbound time once established in the hold?
    (b) when do we start outbound time on the initial entry (teardrop/parallel) ?

    (a) everyone seems to know the answer is abeam or wings level, whichever occur last. However, where can we find this in the AIM ? according to AIM 5-3-7:

    Outbound leg timing begins over/abeam the fix, whichever occurs later. If abeam position cannot be determined, start timing when turn to outbound is completed.

    AIM is saying the latter of over or abeam, NOT wings level or abeam. Wings level only applies to scenarios where abeam position cannot be determined. Does that mean we always start time when abeam for VOR holding?
    Referring to the first part of the sentence, how does "Over" enter into the picture. Wouldn't we always be over the fix first then abeam? can we think of a scenario where abeam will occur first, then over?

    (b) Should we start the outbound time when initially crossing over the VOR? or wait until turn to outbound is completed before starting the time. It would be easier to start time AFTER we turn outbound, but where can we find this on the AIM.

    Many Thanks.
  2. MikeD Administrator

    Member Since:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Message Count:
    29,083
    Likes Received:
    1,727
    For the hold entry, timing is started over/crossing the fix outbound in the entry. This is where "over" comes in.....on the initial entry outbound.

    Once established in the hold, timing is started when abeam the fix on the outbound leg. Or, when the turn is completed if abeam cant be determined. This is where "abeam" comes into play.
    pullup likes this.
  3. ndakcfi Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Message Count:
    89
    Likes Received:
    16
    Since the "over/abeam" is mentioned in the section discussing entering the holding pattern, I'd assume that "over" refers to when you start outbound timing for a teardrop or parallel entry, and "abeam" is when the timing starts on a direct entry.

    As for when to start the outbound time when established in the hold (using the scenario you provided), the Instrument Flying Handbook shows the time being started when the TO/FROM flag flips abeam the VOR. During entries, timing is generally started upon crossing the VOR for a parallel, or when turned to the outbound heading for a teardrop entry.
  4. MikeD Administrator

    Member Since:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Message Count:
    29,083
    Likes Received:
    1,727
    Thats what I said! :)
    pullup likes this.
  5. wayne09 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2011
    Message Count:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the quick response. For the initial entry, I've always been taught to start time when crossing over the VOR. However I've recently been told not to start time until after the turn is completed, reason being that if we start time immediately after crossing, we'll be 10 sec short for teardrop entry (30 degree turn), and for parallel entry we could end up 30 sec short (if we need to turn 90 degree to join for example).

    According to the Instrument Flying Handbook (p.10-12), on initial entry we would turn to outbound first, then time. However AIM seems to state otherwise thus the confusion. I guess this is simliar to the debate on whether we should fly 4NM or 1 min on the initial entry for GPS holds.
  6. wayne09 New Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2011
    Message Count:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are you saying that for teardrop, we turn first, then time.
    For parallel, we can time and turn simultaneously.
    what about parallel entry that requies more than 30 degree turn. should we turn first then time?

    understand different people have different preferences, and wanted to know if there is some guidance from AIM.
  7. MikeD Administrator

    Member Since:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Message Count:
    29,083
    Likes Received:
    1,727
    Crossing the fix outbound on initial entry works fine. For the parallel, even if you are turning more than 30 degrees, the timing you lose isn't that significant. By the time you cross over the fix, you're likely already in your turn, and if you have to do a 90 degree turn to enter on a parallel, then why not just make it a direct entry? Then you don't have to worry about selling yourself short on distance gained for the course reversal, since you won't need one. It's kind of like measuring with a micrometer a maneuver that doesn't require that much precision. Even with a teardrop, you're not going to be making that drastic of a turn to where you have to worry about turning first, then timing.

    Keep it simple; don't try to turn hold entries into rocket science.
    pullup likes this.
  8. ndakcfi Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Message Count:
    89
    Likes Received:
    16
    That's how it's worded in the Instrument Flying Handbook, but in the real world, starting the time when you cross the fix for a teardrop entry would probably work just fine.

    Teaching teardrop entries with "turn, then time" provides consistency for the "5 T's" (turn, time, twist, throttle, talk) in holding patterns, but I've never heard of an examiner failing an instrument student for when they start time in a holding pattern unless they're significantly missing the inbound and outbound fixes.
  9. MidlifeFlyer Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 17, 2003
    Message Count:
    5,173
    Likes Received:
    153
    The 5 (or 6 or 8) Ts are a reminder/checklist of tasks that should be accomplished (or at least considered). They are not necessarily the order in which they should be accomplished. They are a training technique, not a rule.

    Don't over-complicate. Situational awareness beats this level of detail every time.

    I was trying to find an enforcement action in which someone went outbound for 1 minute 10 seconds instead of 1 minute. Couldn't.
    rframe likes this.

Share This Page