jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > Career Specific > The MX Hangar (A&P/AMT)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 1st, 2006, 17:14   #1
SGTCIV
Newbie
 
SGTCIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 27
Send a message via AIM to SGTCIV
Default Why no touch n go's

I noticed at my old flight school that when breaking in a new engine, they didn't allow touch n go's in the hours that it was running mineral oil. At my new school, ATP, they don't allow touch and goes at all. I was wondering if that might be a maintenance issue or safety related... Either way, I assumed that a touch n go was less harmfull than a stop and go because the engine doesn't get a chance to cool down.

Can someone explain to me what is going on?
SGTCIV is offline  
Old August 1st, 2006, 18:13   #2
aloft
Old Skool
 
aloft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Inside your OODA loop
Posts: 7,009
Default Re: Why no touch n go's

It's a maintenance thing. When breaking in a new engine, the engine needs to be run at moderately high power settings for the first 50 hrs or so to seat the piston rings properly.

Then again, some CFIs and flight schools don't believe in touch & go's. Some CFI's believe that performing a touch & go requires too quick a transition from a landing mindset to a takeoff mindset, and this deprives primary students of time to think about and analyze the landing. Touch & go's also have a slightly greater degree of risk than a full-stop landing and taxi-back for takeoff, which, in combination with the foregoing, is probably why ATP doesn't allow them.
__________________
Commercial Pilot, ASEL/AMEL/IA
900+ TT/25 ME
Mountain-qualified Search & Rescue/Disaster Relief Mission Pilot, Civil Air Patrol
B.S., Psychology, Univ of Utah
aloft is offline  
Old August 2nd, 2006, 18:22   #3
SGTCIV
Newbie
 
SGTCIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 27
Send a message via AIM to SGTCIV
Default Re: Why no touch n go's

I get the whole piston ring thing, but from a maintenance standpoint, how is a touch and go any different from a stop and go other than the obvious 15 second time delay involved in coming to a full stop?

I took my multi check ride today (passed) and asked the examiner the same thing. From a safety standpoint, he said, pilots tend to reach for the gear handle instead of the flap handle in those few seconds of transition from dirty to flaps up. With the plane just landing it's possiable for the squatswich to come unseated indicating a false WOW and causing the gear to collapse. This makes sense to me, allot of sense, but I still don't get the engine break in thing and how a touch and go is different from a stop and go or a full stop taxi back for that matter. If anything, touch and go's would keep the engine running at high power setting longer than the other two... ?
SGTCIV is offline  
Old August 2nd, 2006, 19:08   #4
aloft
Old Skool
 
aloft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Inside your OODA loop
Posts: 7,009
Default Re: Why no touch n go's

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGTCIV
I get the whole piston ring thing, but from a maintenance standpoint, how is a touch and go any different from a stop and go other than the obvious 15 second time delay involved in coming to a full stop?
Most places don't want you doing those things either--any pattern work at all, really--during engine break-in . Most of the planes I've ever flown during engine break-in have been limited by their owners to cross-country flights. As I said, engines need to be run at moderately high power, with only minor variations, such as would be done on a typical XC. Pattern work involves too much vascillation between max power for takeoff/climbout and low power/idle for landing.
__________________
Commercial Pilot, ASEL/AMEL/IA
900+ TT/25 ME
Mountain-qualified Search & Rescue/Disaster Relief Mission Pilot, Civil Air Patrol
B.S., Psychology, Univ of Utah
aloft is offline  
Old August 3rd, 2006, 01:32   #5
USMCmech
Old Skool
 
USMCmech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 1,644
Default Re: Why no touch n go's

Quote:
Originally Posted by aloft
Most places don't want you doing those things either--any pattern work at all, really--during engine break-in . Most of the planes I've ever flown during engine break-in have been limited by their owners to cross-country flights. As I said, engines need to be run at moderately high power, with only minor variations, such as would be done on a typical XC. Pattern work involves too much vascillation between max power for takeoff/climbout and low power/idle for landing.

Ditto


Properly breaking in an engine involves basicly running it at full power for several hours. I wouldn't allow ANY patern work on my new engine, besides taking off and a short aporach to land, refuel and repeat untill it has run for 10 hours.


As for the whole touch and go thing, I have never had a student have trouble with them. Ocasionally they will forget flaps, but they do that sometimes too after a full stop.

Doing repeated full stop taxi backs is just a waste of the student's money. I only require them on a students inital solo.
__________________
"You may all go to Hell, I shall go to Texas"

David Crockett

http://www.myspace.com/usmcmech96
USMCmech is offline  
Old August 3rd, 2006, 10:18   #6
naunga
Senior Member
 
naunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 981
Send a message via AIM to naunga
Default Re: Why no touch n go's

Aviation Atlanta doesn't allow T&G's at all either, and I once ask my instructor about it.

Her explanation was that T&G's can be unsafe and are unrealistic, because if you're truly landing you're either going to touch down and stop, or you're going to go-around before the wheels even kiss the pavement.

Made sense to me. It lowers the work load for a student pilot doing pattern work. Instead of touching down, and then rushing to reconfig for take off and possibly missing something, you pull off, get cleaned up, and then get in touch with control.

Anyhow, that's at least why one school doesn't allow T&G's.

Naunga
__________________
Read my blog: All I Want Is Food And Creative Love

"Am I retarded, or am I just overjoyed?"
- Greenday

"Stuart, do you know what the queers are doing to the soil?"
- The Dead Milkmen
naunga is offline  
Old August 12th, 2006, 10:42   #7
surreal1221
Old Skool
 
surreal1221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alpha Tango Lima
Posts: 9,836
Send a message via AIM to surreal1221
Default Re: Why no touch n go's

So for the solo requirement? It can be 3 full stops? I was always under the impression it was 2 touch and goes, then a full stop, to fulfill the 3 to/ldg requirement.
__________________
AGI.MEI.CFI.CFII.FO.CRJ2 | Josh | The TRoP | Rmble On | ALPA | IVAW | ACLU |
surreal1221 is offline  
Old August 12th, 2006, 13:21   #8
Jason
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,007
Default Re: Why no touch n go's

Quote:
Originally Posted by surreal1221 View Post
So for the solo requirement? It can be 3 full stops? I was always under the impression it was 2 touch and goes, then a full stop, to fulfill the 3 to/ldg requirement.
Which solo requirement are you referring to? If you're referring to the initial solo flight, there is no legal requirement placed on you for any certain number of landings - you can do 3 or you can do 30. 3 has always been the 'tradition' for whatever reason and yes traditionally they are 2 touch and goes and 1 full stop but that isn't actually mandated either - they can of course be any type of landing. You are never madated to do any particular type of landing. (Expect for the night currency requirement)
__________________
...till we meet again on the high seas...ARRRRGGGGHHHHH
Jason is offline  
Old August 12th, 2006, 14:28   #9
surreal1221
Old Skool
 
surreal1221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alpha Tango Lima
Posts: 9,836
Send a message via AIM to surreal1221
Default Re: Why no touch n go's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason View Post
Which solo requirement are you referring to? If you're referring to the initial solo flight, there is no legal requirement placed on you for any certain number of landings - you can do 3 or you can do 30. 3 has always been the 'tradition' for whatever reason and yes traditionally they are 2 touch and goes and 1 full stop but that isn't actually mandated either - they can of course be any type of landing. You are never madated to do any particular type of landing. (Expect for the night currency requirement)
Yes the initial.

Alright thanks, that clears up some fog.
__________________
AGI.MEI.CFI.CFII.FO.CRJ2 | Josh | The TRoP | Rmble On | ALPA | IVAW | ACLU |
surreal1221 is offline  
Old August 17th, 2006, 22:22   #10
Timbuff10
Old Skool
 
Timbuff10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Coloradan in Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,235
Default Re: Why no touch n go's

If you are solo and building solo time for your private there is no reason at all to do a touch n go. You need 10 hrs (less for 141) so why not do a full stop, collect yourself and count that time too.

As I recall, ATP didn't like the touch n goes because at many of the airports they have locations at, the runways were cutting it pretty close for doing a touch n go in a seminole.
Timbuff10 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2008 jetcareers.com