![]() |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: North East; KFRG
Posts: 66
|
The tower clears you to land. Then the controller says: "N****, I will change your sequence, you're now number 2". Do you still have a clearance to land? What if they say things like: "There will be a departure prior to your arrival" or "Make S-turns for spacing" ? |
| |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool |
Yeah, you're still cleared to land unless ATC tells you to go missed or gives you a heading to fly and an altitude to climb to.
|
| |
| | #3 |
| Old Skool |
I would key the mic and say "Am I cleared to land still?" There is no way you can reliably expect every controller to do the same thing in that situation. |
| |
| | #4 |
| Administrator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Pinal Airpark
Posts: 6,897
|
[ QUOTE ] Yeah, you're still cleared to land unless ATC tells you to go missed or give you a heading to fly and an altitude to climb to. [/ QUOTE ] True. And in addition, most ATC controllers will reiterate the landing clearance following the re-sequence. As JT said, if in doubt at any time, query ATC. |
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 619
|
[ QUOTE ] The tower clears you to land. Then the controller says: "N****, I will change your sequence, you're now number 2". Do you still have a clearance to land? What if they say things like: [/ QUOTE ] My appreciation of this example is that your clearance to land is still valid contingent on you seeing the other aircraft. My feeling is that until I have the ahead airplane in sight, then I am not cleared to land. |
| |
| | #6 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Utopia
Posts: 12,567
|
[ QUOTE ] My feeling is that until I have the ahead airplane in sight, then I am not cleared to land. [/ QUOTE ] I can see your point clearly, Bluelake. That being said, if you don't land and you create a traffic conflict yourself, you could possibly be violate for deviating from an ATC clearance without a good reason. Remember, the local controller can issue a landing clearance based on anticipated seperation. |
| |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 619
|
like if I extended my downwind 5 miles while looking for traffic that was reported to be on short final ??? Agreed. That said, at the Class D airport I teach in/around, I know the dirty little secret that the dude in the tower is really a RUNWAY SEPERATION CONTROLLER (oft referred to as 'ATC'), so I will always edge in the direction that favors the controllers one and only responsibility. As a common example, If I (on downwind to base) got to choose between cutting in behind too close to traffic on short final and cutting off the guy on a 4 mile straight in... i prioritize for the guy ahead of me and the controllers responsibilities. |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |