jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > General > Technical Talk

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 1st, 2008, 11:45   #1
skyhigh600
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CMI
Posts: 11
Default RNAV (RNP) Z approach

Hey everyone, I am a little confused as to what the difference is between these RNAV "designator" approaches...

For example, what is the difference between the RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 8L @ ATL and the RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 8L @ ATL?

I have also seen these "designtor" appraoches for approach plates in other countries. For example, how would an ILS Y 25R @ Quito, Equcador (**made up approach - can't remember the exact approach or where it was that I saw it**) differ from a regular ILS approach??

Thanks in advance!!
skyhigh600 is offline  
Old April 1st, 2008, 14:09   #2
MidlifeFlyer
Old Skool
 
MidlifeFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,918
Default Re: RNAV (RNP) Z approach

They're explained in the AIM.

All the "Z" and "Y" designators mean is that there are two different approaches that use the same primary navigation source. There's nothing "special" about a "Z" approach other than that there is a "Y" one. And you don't have to make them up in foreign countries - there are ILS Z and ILS Y approaches in the US. (As I reacll Houston has some.)

The differences can be anything from IAFs and step-downs to minimums and missed approach holding fixes. To know what the difference is between any particular Z and Y combination, you'd have to look at the two charts.
__________________
Mark
www.midlifeflight.com
"I don't understand" doesn't mean it's gray
MidlifeFlyer is online now  
Old April 1st, 2008, 15:53   #3
woodreau
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 256
Default Re: RNAV (RNP) Z approach

They also start from the backend of the alphabet, e.g. Z, Y, X, W so as not to confuse these approaches with the circling approaches like, VOR-DME A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, etc...
__________________
Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from surviving bad judgement.
woodreau is offline  
Old April 1st, 2008, 21:29   #4
B767Driver
Old Skool
 
B767Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,841
Default Re: RNAV (RNP) Z approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by skyhigh600 View Post
Hey everyone, I am a little confused as to what the difference is between these RNAV "designator" approaches...

For example, what is the difference between the RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 8L @ ATL and the RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 8L @ ATL?

I have also seen these "designtor" appraoches for approach plates in other countries. For example, how would an ILS Y 25R @ Quito, Equcador (**made up approach - can't remember the exact approach or where it was that I saw it**) differ from a regular ILS approach??

Thanks in advance!!

The GPS approach is a bit different from the RNP approach. Most GPS approaches can also be flown as an overlay with ground based navaids. The RNP does not permit that flexibility...and must have certain equipment on board to ensure proper course tracking.
__________________
A self described gym rat. "I got next."
B767Driver is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 jetcareers.com