![]() |
| | #1 |
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29
| I knowthis should be in technical talk but I was having a hard time trying to start a new thread there. question: let say current alt is 30.08 and airport elevation is 1000 so my pressure altitude would be 840ft. If im flying in the area at 4000 does that mean i subtract the same amount from my indicated alt that i did from my airport elevation to get my density alt at 4000????? |
| |
| | #2 |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: GRR
Posts: 8,277
| <relocated>
__________________ . Life is painful. Suffering is optional. |
| |
| | #3 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: New York
Posts: 1,664
| Quote:
Density alt = Pressure altitude corrected for non-standard temperature. | |
| |
| | #4 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Indian rocks Beach
Posts: 169
| Quote:
__________________ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() :n ana2:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: SLC
Posts: 759
| Ok time for a helicopter pilot to step in. DA rules my life these days. Find your pressure altitutde. Find temp for the area. Find the difference from standard. Easy formula DA= PA+/-(temp*117) All the books on it I have read say 120 but 117 gets you within 50 ft. I always add my correction to any alt I am at so I know for sure what my hover ceilings are at and my Vne. It would suck having to explain to the boss why I had to do a running takeoff with private student on a cross country. Hope this helps Shane
__________________ Comm Rotorcraft CFI, CFII Rotorcraft |
| |
| | #6 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,028
| Yes, assuming you meant pressure altitude. You would need to correct the result for temperature, just as you would at the airport elevation to get density altitude.
__________________ Core Concepts of Flight If an error is corrected whenever it is recognized as such, the path of error is the path of truth --Hans Reichenback |
| |
| | #7 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2003 Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,891
| Quote:
120 is probably used because (1) it consistently results in a higher number that the real calculation and (2) multiplying by 20 an easier mental calculation than multiplying by 17 (for a lot of folks, anyway). | |
| |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: SLC
Posts: 759
| Makes sense most of the da I have worked with have only been within 500' agl. I don't like to fly any higher than that. Shane
__________________ Comm Rotorcraft CFI, CFII Rotorcraft |
| |
| | #9 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 269
| I use temp Fahrenheit above standard / 15 *1000 for a quick estimate in my head. So at my home airport of 5 grand if its 85 out we are about 50 F above standard / 15 equals about 3 thousand+ feet added to my PA so somewhere around 8500 DA -Jason |
| |
| | #10 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 2,015
| The 120 or 117 correction factor is still much, much better than using an E6B. I teach both, but the 120 factor better accuracy.
__________________ |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |