![]() |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 515
| I know the so called standard technique for shooting a dme arc. Get the airplane at a tangent to the arc and every 10 degrees change heading 10 degrees, however, I heard someone tell me about using the ground speed function on the dme, and get the relative ground speed to zero, anyone heard of this? interesting... |
| |
| | #3 |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2003 Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,918
| Nope, never heard of it being used. But it sorta makes technical sense. If you're not increasing or decreasing your distance from the DME, your GS =relative to the DME= would be zero. If you want to be =that= precise. I don't really teach "turn 10, twist 10" either. I explain it since my student is bound to come across it but, even before I go go on, the student usually figures out that this s a lot more compleicated than it needs to be and that maintaining the target DME distance with small corrections (actually it is a bit like maintaining 0 GS) coupled with periodic twists of the OBS to maintain situational awareness is more than enough. DME Arc - one of those maneuvers that, IMO, are much easier to fly than to explain. |
| |
| | #4 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,841
| Quote:
__________________ A self described gym rat. "I got next." | |
| |
| | #5 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: South of the Border
Posts: 1,748
| i teach if you actually have a DME box (only like 5 of our 80+ planes do now) if you can get the DME to 12, and the GS to read 01 (it won't go to zero) then you will not be moving in or out on the arc. turn 10, twist 10 is all for situational awareness
__________________ CFI, CFII, MEI -Why is it when two planes almost hit each other it is called a near miss? Shouldn't it be called a near hit? |
| |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,411
| What? This seems like the most accurate way of flying the arc. If you are so close to the prescribed DME arc that there is little GS displayed then you are doing alot better then the 10 and 10 method.
__________________ Chris, CFI, CFII Now I could let these dream killers kill my self-esteem or use it as the steam to power my dreams That's how you treat things, stay hungry. |
| |
| | #7 |
| Junior Member | I would have to say that the "turn 10 twist 10" coupled with a DME from either a GPS or actual DME receiver provides the most situational awareness and accurate navigation. Using one technique with out the other may lead to problem, but this is just my opinion.
__________________ |
| |
| | #8 |
| Old Skool | Yup. Couldn't agree more. |
| |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member | The key to an Arc is workload. My first thought on the GS this is that would entice you to stare at that speed to see if it is changing. I think the key is flying a heading that makes sense. How you derive that heading has a bunch of options. The turn 10, twist 10 is how I used to teach it but I still think it is workload intense. The best way to do it is on autopilot ![]()
__________________ Get in shape on your overnights: http://www.fitnessanywhere.com/Merch...27&AFFIL=Ophir |
| |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Murfreesboro, TN USA
Posts: 914
| Yeah, kinda. I was taught the standard "turn 10 twist 10" technique, but also to use the ground speed indication on the DME to back it up.
__________________ When seconds count, the police are only minutes away |
| |
| | #11 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2003 Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,918
| Quote:
Frankly, "twist 10" always struck me as the IFR training equivalent of VFR checkpoints every 10 miles - a lot of extra work with zero extra benefit. Maybe a negative benefit since it seems to me it artificially increases the workload during one of th busiest phases of flight. So, let's try to cubbyhole this one into a "turn 10 twist 10" framework: http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0712/05222VDTZ15.PDF | |
| |
| | #12 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: South of the Border
Posts: 1,748
| Quote:
__________________ CFI, CFII, MEI -Why is it when two planes almost hit each other it is called a near miss? Shouldn't it be called a near hit? | |
| |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: KIWA
Posts: 375
| I've been teaching both methods for a while now. I like the 'DME only' method a bit better because you can use your nav/hsi for another use than just for the arc itself. However, I've noticed with my students that they have a bit more trouble 'staying on top of' the 'DME only' method. It will work fine until they get distracted with something, and once they really start to get off the arc things don't usually get better. The 'turn and twist' method seems to work better for most of them.
__________________ "Because like a virgin getting his first piece (most, but not all) low time pilots are just happy to be there." -Maximillian_Jenius |
| |
| | #14 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Ohio
Posts: 665
| Quote:
...IMHO. -mini Last edited by minitour; November 6th, 2007 at 20:12. | |
| |
| | #15 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,841
| Quote:
What radial are you on? Where are you in respect to your lead radial or final approach course? Did you turn the proper way to get on the arc? I believe there is a lot of benefit to updating the radial frequently in terms of situational awareness. Flying the GS readout alone doesn't answer all of the questions I'd like to know.
__________________ A self described gym rat. "I got next." | |
| |
| | #16 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,841
| What does this mean?
__________________ A self described gym rat. "I got next." |
| |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Ohio
Posts: 665
| |
| |
| | #18 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,411
| Quote:
__________________ Chris, CFI, CFII Now I could let these dream killers kill my self-esteem or use it as the steam to power my dreams That's how you treat things, stay hungry. | |
| |
| | #19 |
| Junior Member | Some nav radios have a mode where instead of the standby frequency they show the radial that you're on. I find it pretty handy for flying DME arcs since you can use the DME readout to stay on the arc and still easily cross check where on the arc you are without constantly twisting the OBS. |
| |
| | #20 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Florida
Posts: 44
| I start out with a single needle indication on the HSI (G1000) and the "turn 10, twist 10". No wind indication, no moving map, no nothing. Once they get the hang of it I introduce the RMI function, now upon joining the arc set the HSI course needle to the inbound course and fly the arc on the RMI and DME. Pretty much instant situational awareness and an accurate idea of what's going on. The 10/10 method is one of the easiest to explain, not necessarily the most convenient to use in real life flying, but it is a method to reach the goal of understanding.
__________________ Gold Seal, NAFI CFI/CFII/MEI KAPF Florida |
| |
| | #21 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: KAMA
Posts: 305
| The thing I hate about "turn 10 twist 10" is that it usually full deflects the needle, which I think can cause a bit of confusion at times. My method is to have the student twist the VOR so the needle is one or two dots deflected. That way they always know which radial they are on within a few degrees. Also, they can easily calculate which heading they need to hold by looking at the 3 o'clock or 9 o'clock position on the VOR dial. On a HSI, I have them twist it so it mimics a RMI needle. I think a RMI is the easiest way to do a DME arc... |
| |
| | #22 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: South of the Border
Posts: 1,748
| Quote:
saves on some of the unnecessary workload. as they progress and understand more, if they keep doing the 10/10 thing, great. otherwise whatever.
__________________ CFI, CFII, MEI -Why is it when two planes almost hit each other it is called a near miss? Shouldn't it be called a near hit? | |
| |
| | #23 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Unfortunately not Hispania
Posts: 304
| My two cents. Per the original question, yes that is how i do it. Flying steam gauges, I never really stayed to the twist ten turn ten rule. I twisted only as necessary to keep the needle away from full scale deflection for SA, and looked at the groundspeed readout. If it was on the ARC and GS was less than 10 kts you were right where you need to be. My turn was based mostly on GS and yes I have seen GS "00", more than once. If you get it at zero and it starts to creep up, that is when it is time to turn a couple of degrees. If you twist ten turn ten you will fly towards the station and your gs will increase and decrease and usually you will be just inside the arc. Arc-ing around was obviously much easier on the RMI. Just keep the needle within 5-10 degrees (depending on wind) of the wingline and you got it, it also gives 100% situational awareness. I love the G1000 with the combined HSI and RMI. You could twist your inbound or outbound course in the HSI and use the rmi needle until the hsi course comes alive, no need to twist anymore. When the head (or tail depending on course) gets with in 10 degrees they squeeze together until they line up. |
| |
| | #24 |
| Senior Member | For me, I teach the student to lead the turn on to the arc and to put the bearing pointer on the EHSI about 5 degress above the 90 degree index if he's on the arc. When the bearing pointer gets to 5 degrees below the 90 index, turn and do it again. For corrections, I teach him to keep the bearing pointer 5 degrees above the 90 index for each 1/2 mile inside the desired arc, or 10 degrees below the 90 index for each 1/2 outside the arc. But if I didn't have an airplane with a bearing pointer, I obviously would have to teach something else. I've heard of the "turn 10, twist 10" technique, which seems like your only really good option if all you have is the OBS. If your DME receiver also has a groundspeed readout then maybe supplementing with making the groundspeed stay at zero would be good. The only down side that I see to the ground speed only is that there isn't any difference between the 20 knots TOWARDS the station display and 20 knots AWAY from the station display. So it will tell you that you aren't doing it correct, but it won't tell you which way to turn to fix it. You'd have to wait to see if the DME increased or decreased before you knew that you needed a left turn vs. a right turn.
__________________ Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation? |
| |
| | #25 |
| Junior Member | I have not heard of this method. I did ask around and and a few CFI's have heard of it but all agreed its not the best or too acurate
__________________ KA-BLAHHHH....FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!!! |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |