![]() |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 522
| So, I know this guy who is absolutely afraid of the barber poll in the 1900. He doesn't want to nose over to the poll whenever he starts his descent, and is terrified that he will nose over and enter a "mach tuck." This is rediculous, but there is no way for me to prove it unless I can get some info on the airfoil of the 1900. If I could find out what the critical mach number is I could prove to him that at .48M (Mmo in the 1900c) we are nowhere near the critical mach #. Anyone know where to look? |
| |
| | #2 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,110
| Quote:
.48M would be a very low critical mach, as you know.
__________________ Core Concepts of Flight If an error is corrected whenever it is recognized as such, the path of error is the path of truth --Hans Reichenback | |
| |
| | #3 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,841
| Your answer won't lie in the horizontal airfoil (the wing) but in the vertical ones (the props). A turboprop is mostly limited to such a low mach to prevent the propellers from going supersonic (specifically the tips). Mach tuck won't be an issue. On a lot of the racing airplanes you will see shortened diameter propellers that enable the airplane to go faster without losing efficiency to mach effects at the prop tips.
__________________ A self described gym rat. "I got next." |
| |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 522
| thanks a lot |
| |
| | #5 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 522
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Mom n' Pop Retailer
Posts: 665
| If it goes any faster all of those ridiculous winglets and vortilons and whatever the heck else those things the engineers stuck on that airplane to make it fly are called might fall off!
__________________ ATP Types (LRJET / B737 / SF340 / BAe3101) SIC (DC9 / CRJ / D328) CFI, CFII, MEI, AGI, IGI, Aircraft Dispatcher. |
| |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 522
| |
| |
| | #8 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Big D
Posts: 1,322
| Quote:
I've been flying the 1900 for about six months.. had a guy set off the overspeed for a second once. We're still here.
__________________ “The conduct of TSA was cruel and unnecessary,” said Ms Allred. “The last time that I checked a nipple was not a dangerous weapon.” - Charlie (credentials in profile) | |
| |
| | #9 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,291
| Quote:
B1900D Mmo .48 Max Alt FL250 King Air 300/350 Mmo .58 Max Alt FL350 http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Gu...FILE/a24ce.pdf Please tell me he isn't a PIC...... | |
| |
| | #10 |
| Old Skool | ROFL Some one told him the barber pole was the limit for mach tuck??!!? For your airplane to be able to mach tuck, it needs to not be built like a dump truck!
__________________ British Airways flight asks for push back clearance from terminal. Control Tower replies: "And where is the world's most experienced airline going today without filing a flight plan?" |
| |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 522
| |
| |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 522
| |
| |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 514
| Ride the pole like a stripper! Especially on the last leg or min day.
__________________ 4 forces of flight: Stall, Spin, Crash, & Burn |
| |
| | #14 |
| Old Skool | Mach tuck in a Beech........Not gonna happen. Period. The speed limitations like were said earlier are to prevent the props from going supersonic. Its the same reason helicopters don't go that fast.
__________________ As a wise man said, sumb!tch flew in, sumb!tch'll fly out. Ski Hard. Party Harder. |
| |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 522
| I know, that's what I said |
| |
| | #16 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 70
| I would ask him how it is that mach tuck could be a risk on a plane that doesn't even go half the speed of sound (.48). Shouldn't it be obvious to an airline pilot that no local flow over any surface of an airplane that goes so slow will get anywhere near supersonic? (Prop tips excepted.) Ask him to define Mmo. |
| |
| | #17 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,110
| Actually, for airfoils that weren't intended for high speed, critical mach can be quite low. I'm looking at some data indicating .58 or so for an airfoil similar to the one on the Beech, and that's at a low AOA. Put this aircraft into a 60 degree bank and the critical mach would be much lower.
__________________ Core Concepts of Flight If an error is corrected whenever it is recognized as such, the path of error is the path of truth --Hans Reichenback |
| |
| | #18 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 522
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #19 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: 3rd Rock From the Sun
Posts: 841
| I'm surprised no one here asked if this guy went to GIA ??? Did he ??
__________________ Nolite Te Bastasdes Carborundrum !!!!! |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |