![]() |
| | #1 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169
| I saw this question on an airline pilot interview essay. If one plane is going .78 Mach and another plane is going .85 Mach and the planes are 50 miles apart, when will the faster plane catch up? 35 minutes, is that the right answer?
__________________ My accomplishments: 30,000 hours logged, at yo momma's house! |
| |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member | Well, there is a lot of information to answer this question that you don't have, but with some assumptions you can get an answer. Assumptions: The faster airplane is behind the slower airplane both on the same course. (Obviously, if they aren't going the same way, they might not ever meet!) Mach*10= miles/minute. This is a pretty good approximation, but not exact. In order to get the exact you would need to know temperature, density, etc, etc, but since they didn't tell you the altitude or that the problem was on a standard day, this approximation is the best you've got. Ok, on to the problem. The faster airplane is behind the slower airplane. The faster airplane is going .85 Mach and the slower airplane is going .78 Mach, so the faster airplane is gaining by .07 mach. That means the faster airplane is gaining by .7 miles/minute. So how long does it take to close 50 miles at .7 miles/minute? 50/.7= 71.428 minutes, or about an hour and 11 minutes.
__________________ Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation? |
| |
| | #3 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: KRST
Posts: 1,819
| Quote:
ding ding ding, YOU WIN A CHEEEZBURGER!
__________________ Aircraft without engine(s) prohibited... -KMIA 10-9 | |
| |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member | I love cheeezburgers. Where do I collect? (Actually that's probably a really funny quote from a movie or TV or something, but I didn't recognize the reference).
__________________ Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation? |
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member | Oh, hey mavmb, I think I figured out how you came up with 35 minutes, and it's actually a really common problem when people try to work out word problems. Basically you lost track of the units, so instead of dividing 50 by .7, you probably tried to divide .7 by 50, and then maneuver the decimal place around so that the number made sense. So here is how you avoid doing that: (BTW this works great in chemistry classes and physics classes if anyone is taking those). Before you start working through a math problem, figure out what the units are in each of your different pieces, and what you expect the units of the answer to be. For example, we had Mach numbers, which are unitless, and we had distance (measured in miles) and we knew that our answer had to be a time (minutes). So far, nothing cancels, but if we had a conversion from Mach number to miles/minute, we might be able to get the "miles" in "miles/minute" to cancel with the "miles" in the distance, and leave us with just minutes. Now, when you write out the problem, write it out with the units included, and make sure that the units make sense and come out correctly, and that will ensure that the answer comes out correctly also. So if you had converted .07 Mach to .7 miles/minute and then divided by 50 miles, you would have noticed that the units of the answer was "1/minutes". Basically, the units are upside down. So that means the equation was probably upside down (or possibly screwed up some other way). Now, this won't catch every mistake. But you'll catch a lot.
__________________ Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation? |
| |
| | #6 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,242
| So complicated. Do you realize that .7 * 50 = 35 ?
__________________ Core Concepts of Flight If an error is corrected whenever it is recognized as such, the path of error is the path of truth --Hans Reichenback |
| |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member | Uhh. yeah. That's what he did..... Whatever, the units don't work out that way either-- That way you get miles squared/minute, not minutes.
__________________ Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation? |
| |
| | #8 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,242
| I have yet to see non-technical types that understand this line of argumentation. The idea that units can cancel with other units is mind-boggling.
__________________ Core Concepts of Flight If an error is corrected whenever it is recognized as such, the path of error is the path of truth --Hans Reichenback |
| |
| | #9 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169
| Okay thanks! I see what I did. Doh!
__________________ My accomplishments: 30,000 hours logged, at yo momma's house! |
| |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Low Earth Orbit
Posts: 1,354
| |
| |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member | Dude, you forgot the big arrow at the bottom to point to your avatar! Like this: <---------------------------------------- ![]()
__________________ Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation? |
| |
| | #12 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: SF Bay Area, CA or Boulder, CO
Posts: 169
| 1 Hour, 3 Minutes, 11 Seconds assuming the aircraft are at 30,000ft. Find the speed of sound at altitude Calculate the velocities of the two jets Calculate the speed the faster one overtakes the smaller one Time = Distance / Velocity Takes less than a minute to figure out. Not quite as quick as the "shortcut" mentioned above, but this way is 100% accurate. The other way was off by 12%, and that could make a difference if we are talking hours.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oX6pNsQzRy4 Props are 4 boats. Jets are 4 hot tubs. Rockets are for aerospacepilot! |
| |
| | #13 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
I think you may have made a math error, but you're correct that your method would give the exact number. (Although the original problem didn't include an altitude, so how did you know to use 30,000 ft? If you compute at sea level, or 20,000 or 50,000 you'll get different times) Using the same 30,000 feet, though, I come up with: a (the speed of sound on a standard day)=994.8 ft/sec a*3600 seconds/hour=3581280 ft/hour 3581280 ft/hour / (6076 ft/NM)= 589.41 NM/hour The slow airplane's speed =.78 Mach =.78*589.41= 459.7 NM/hour The fast airplane's speed= .85 Mach = .85*589.41= 501.0 The overtake is the fast speed minus the slow speed =501-459.7= 41.3NM/Hour 50 Miles/(41.3 NM/hour)=1.211 hours This is the same as 1 hour and an additional .211 hours*60 minutes/hour or 1 hour and 12.66 minutes. Or 1 hour 12 minutes, 39.6 seconds. The answer that I came up with using my WAG was 71.428 minutes, which is the same as 1.190 hours. Therefore the error in that method isn't 12%, it's actually only (1.211-1.190)/1.211=.0173, or 1.73% So in short, it was a very good approximation
__________________ Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation? | |
| |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member | I also noticed that the original problem didn't specify whether the two airplanes were 50 Nautical miles apart or 50 statute miles apart, but I assumed they were 50 Nautical miles apart. The difference? Well a statute mile is 5280 ft. A Nautical mile is 6076 feet. So if the airplanes were 50 statute miles apart, they were 264000 feet apart. If they were 50 nautical miles apart, they were 303800 feet apart. That's a difference of 39800 ft, which is 6.55 NM, or 7.54 statute miles. At about 7 miles/minute, that's about 1 minutes worth of error (close to 1%) right there.
__________________ Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation? |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |