![]() |
| | #1 |
| Old Skool | I tried to look it up but I really couldn't get a direct "pilot explanation" if you know what I mean. I looked through a few books, like Pilots handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, but I seem more confused coming out. Can some one please give me an explanation of how it works?
__________________ -Paul It ain't always 65 and sunny |
| |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,242
| The normal explanation is this: There are two signals, one which is directional and rotates through 360 degrees around the VOR and the other which issues an omni-directional signal when the rotating signal is pointed towards 360. Your receiver detects the omni-directional signal, which indicates the rotating signal is pointed North, and starts a clock. When it detects the rotating signal, it checks the time elapsed since it received the omni-directional signal and, using a known rotation rate, it figures out many degrees the rotating signal rotated in the elapsed time, which determines which radial the aircraft is on.
__________________ Core Concepts of Flight If an error is corrected whenever it is recognized as such, the path of error is the path of truth --Hans Reichenback |
| |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Bubble Pop Suck and Squeeze
Posts: 1,050
| To use another CFI cliche, think of a VOR as a dual lighted Light House. The first light rotates and a split second later the second light rotates. The time between light A and light B computes what radial your on. Of course, I think this happens many times over a second. Very basic. Hope this starts a platform to better understand. |
| |
| | #4 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
![]() | |
| |
| | #5 |
| Banned Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,329
| Thread derail: nice grammar. I've been thinking about this for like weeks. But if someone asks you how you're doing, the response "Pretty well" is the correct answer, isn't it?!?!? It's driving me nuts that everybody looks at me weird when I say that. If I am doing well, I'll say well. Pretty well is adverb+adverb... Sounds legit to me. |
| |
| | #6 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #7 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: In my apartment.
Posts: 3,191
| Quote:
Maybe they're making the face at "pretty" - like, they're thinking, "So, you're only pretty well? What does that mean? Am I supposed to ask you what's keeping you from being TOTALLY well?" | |
| |
| | #8 |
| Banned Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,329
| It drives me crazy when I ask people how they're doing and they say "Good." I usually respond, you're well. I think it pisses people off, but there's two things they can do about it: nothing, and like it. |
| |
| | #9 | |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: GRR
Posts: 8,483
| Quote:
Oh, and about that "...for like weeks" thing you've got going there... ![]() <edit to add: oops, you started the good/well discussion without me. I'm slow. Good and slow.>
__________________ . If life gives you lemons, throw 'em into a quart of vodka. ~Red Green | |
| |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,427
| What it is doing technically is looking at the phase shift between the two signals if it is peak verse valley then it is a 180 degree phase shift. |
| |
| | #11 | |||
| Old Skool | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ -Paul It ain't always 65 and sunny | |||
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |