jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > General > Technical Talk

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 9th, 2006, 00:14   #1
flyTotheSky
Senior Member
 
flyTotheSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LUK
Posts: 377
Default RPM development at T/O - Constant Speed vs. Fixed Pitch

From my understanding we redline the tach in a constant speed a/c because the prop is in the most efficient angle for t/o (low blade angle/high rpm).

In a fixed pitch prop - we seldom, if ever redline the tach when we set full power for t/o. Is this because the prop might be a cruise prop? Or is there an additional reason for this?

Obviously we have environmental issues to consider, specifically air density and how that effects the prop.
flyTotheSky is offline  
Old November 9th, 2006, 09:20   #2
tgrayson
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,224
Default Re: RPM development at T/O - Constant Speed vs. Fixed Pitch

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyTotheSky View Post
From my understanding we redline the tach in a constant speed a/c because the prop is in the most efficient angle for t/o (low blade angle/high rpm).
Prop efficiency isn't so much the issue as the total package. Thrust Horsepower is a function of propeller efficiency AND brake horsepower. Brake Horsepower is maximized at the highest RPM the engine can develop.

THP = Prop Efficiency * BHP

<<In a fixed pitch prop - we seldom, if ever redline the tach when we set full power for t/o. Is this because the prop might be a cruise prop? Or is there an additional reason for this?>>

A constant speed prop can maintain an optimal AOA throughout a wide range of airspeeds. A fixed pitch prop cannot. A typical prop is a compromise between an efficient climber and an efficient cruiser. At takeoff speeds, most props have too large of an AOA to allow the engine to develop full RPM. As airspeed comes up, the RPM will go up, because the AOA is reduced by the forward motion of the aircraft. If the propeller had a low enough blade angle, it could develop full RPM early in the takeoff, but would overspeed as the airspeed came up.
tgrayson is online now  
Old November 9th, 2006, 11:07   #3
flyTotheSky
Senior Member
 
flyTotheSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LUK
Posts: 377
Default Re: RPM development at T/O - Constant Speed vs. Fixed Pitch

tgrayson,

Thanks again for the insight.

Quote:
A typical prop is a compromise between an efficient climber and an efficient cruiser. At takeoff speeds, most props have too large of an AOA to allow the engine to develop full RPM. As airspeed comes up, the RPM will go up, because the AOA is reduced by the forward motion of the aircraft. If the propeller had a low enough blade angle, it could develop full RPM early in the takeoff, but would overspeed as the airspeed came up.
This statement is referring to a fixed pitch prop, correct?
flyTotheSky is offline  
Old November 9th, 2006, 11:22   #4
tgrayson
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,224
Default Re: RPM development at T/O - Constant Speed vs. Fixed Pitch

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyTotheSky View Post
This statement is referring to a fixed pitch prop, correct?
Affirm. Some diagrams show the fixed pitch prop partially stalled at the start of the takeoff run.
tgrayson is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 jetcareers.com