![]() |
| | #1 |
| Old Skool | Im just curious on some of your thoughts on what you prefer to fly. I like the Piper because Im not a fan of the high wing design and the Piper doesnt seem to have as many blind spots. Anyone?
__________________ JoBama 08 |
| |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool | Cessna. Oh, and wrong forum ![]()
__________________ ![]() ![]() |
| |
| | #3 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: ROC
Posts: 2,211
| In a nut shell they're about the same. The wing placement doesnt make much of a differance. There are pluses and Negitives to both. I like the control feel of the Warriors, its not a musshy as the Cessnas. Try both out and see what one you like. Dont read into the whole low wing, high wing thing too much. I laugh when I hear a "low wing" check out.
__________________ |
| |
| | #4 |
| Old Skool | I have tried both. Cessna seems a bit sluggish on climouts. Im taking up the Warrior for a few this Saturday, love that airplane.
__________________ JoBama 08 |
| |
| | #5 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: ROC
Posts: 2,211
| Quote:
__________________ | |
| |
| | #6 |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2003 Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,974
| I wouldn't be at all surprised that in most cases, the configuration you learned in (high or low) is the one you like the best. Champcar's experience is a good example. I learned in a Tomahawk and the first time I turned downwind to base I thought, "where the heck did the runway go?" I'm sure that Cessna learners who make that first PA-28 transition after being able to look out the window during the flare and see =exactly= how high the wheels are off the ground can't figure out how the heck you can =possibly= land the beast properly. Assuming you stay with flying light aircraft, the preference probably follows along. In my area, the flight schools tend to be heavily Cessna, so I now have a lot more experience in that line than in the Pipers. Nevertheless, despite the passage of time (and a bit of type rust), those low wings still just feel better. |
| |
| | #7 | |
| Administrator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Pinal Airpark
Posts: 6,897
| Quote:
![]() Am used to both actually. Really no preference over high or low wing, and both companies put out a good product IMO. Like the Cessna 207/208 and O-2 series; as well as the Piper Cherokee 6/Lance series.
__________________ Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies inside us while we live. | |
| |
| | #8 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Winchestertonfieldville
Posts: 6,608
| Piper is a much better airplane IMO.
__________________ The simplest answer tends to be correct. |
| |
| | #9 |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: GRR
Posts: 8,483
| I'm currently flying a Cessna low wing. ![]()
__________________ . If life gives you lemons, throw 'em into a quart of vodka. ~Red Green |
| |
| | #10 | |
| Administrator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Pinal Airpark
Posts: 6,897
| Quote:
__________________ Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies inside us while we live. | |
| |
| | #11 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 1,306
| Quote:
Touche. Can't beat the cub!
__________________ http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/mastermags2/ If you are racist, I will invade you with the North. CFI, CFII, MEI, CRJ-700 FO, humanitarian | |
| |
| | #12 |
| Old Skool | I fly mostly 172's. I did fly a Cherokee 140 a few days ago, and noticed that it was a bit more responsive. It was also a BIOTCH! to get in and out of. It also took to crosswinds a whole lot easier that the Cessna. Seemed to float a little less on flare as well. Having only that to judge from, I don't see much difference. I am sure that in higher performance types there may be a huge difference.
__________________ www.flywhiteair.com http://www.myspace.com/desertdog71 Following message is for SkyCougar. ![]() Took my chances on a big jet plane, Never let them tell you that they're all the same. |
| |
| | #13 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY BABY!
Posts: 56
| I started out on cessnas early in my training, and I ended up instructing at a school that also had pipers. I must say that I luv BOTH. The highwings are good for when on a cross-country you would be able to see your checkpoint almost straight down, just pop the window open and look . But I also agree that the piper low wings have a control feel that's better (at least a little) than the cessnas (especially the ARCHER). After that, it comes down knowing the blindspots and personal preference.
__________________ __________________________________ If the blue side is down, the green side is up, and the altimeter is counting down from 200 feet.......there is something VERY wrong! __________________________________ IF the beauty of flying is Marylin Monroe, then the knowledge and skill to fly competently and safely is Joe DiMaggio....BEFORE their divorce;-) |
| |
| | #14 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
"I'll stop calling you twin Cessna when you stop calling me approach" | |
| |
| | #15 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: BOS/GFK
Posts: 297
| My opinion is that Piper's are easier to land, but Cessnas are easier to fly with the right amount of rudder. Cessnas are my vote. I like the view down below. |
| |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: kads
Posts: 806
| whichever is cheaper.
__________________ http://www.m-w.com/dictionary.htm this reference tool contains examples of the proper spellings and usages of the following words: your, you're, there, their, they're, than, then |
| |
| | #17 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
ATC: "Citation XXX, say mach number" Pilot: ".63" (silence) ATC: "You can only do .63?" Pilot: "Yeah, we're in a toy jet." As far as Piper v Cessna...I've flown both quite a bit, and I like the low wing planes better, but that's just personal preference. After I finished my private, I did everything else in a low wing (Beechcraft, however).
__________________ Jason | |
| |
| | #18 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: AZO
Posts: 1,331
| Quote:
About Cessna vs. Piper....both of them are good planes to fly. adreamer
__________________ CFI/CFII/MEI/Right seat | |
| |
| | #19 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Most of the time in the air
Posts: 7,345
| Hmm... I think Cessna 172's are easier to land but Warriors are more stable and require less rudder input to make a coordinated turn (maybe because of the wing has a larger angled dihedral?). I like both just as much. |
| |
| | #20 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: ROC
Posts: 2,211
| Quote:
__________________ | |
| |
| | #21 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 55
| I prefer mid-wing Lockheeds! I did my training in Pipers, but did all of my instructing in Cessnas. I don't think that one is clearly superior to another. I have noticed that many people like the "look" of a low wing, as a high wing Cessna screams trainer. Flying single engine over the rocks, I'll take a high wing. It will land anywhere a low wing will, but the same can not be said the other way around. Plus, I'm constantly looking for places to put down for when (if) the engine coughs or sputters, and the high wing facillitates that as your best spot for landing may be abeam or even behind you. Just my $.02 Stonefly |
| |
| | #22 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Utopia
Posts: 12,503
| Quote:
Silly people . . . ![]()
__________________ ![]() ------- One person says "stop gloating - life sucks!" while another says "be happy - at least you have a job!" . . . people are just stupid. | |
| |
| | #23 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
__________________ JoBama 08 | |
| |
| | #24 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Vegas
Posts: 2,022
| Cessna: Smooth easier for Slushie to get in and out of better for pictures. Hard to fuel if they dont have a step. bungee nosewheel steering Piper: Crappy panel layouts Ugly little lines on the rudder "Alright, [insert girl's name here], I have to get in first", Hard to sump under the wings. fuel pumps. need to wear a hat in Vegas summers. I still can't land the Arrow.
__________________ There is not much at lushaviation.com |
| |
| | #25 |
| Old Skool | The REAL DA-20 is a pretty cool lookin bird! ![]()
__________________ Jason Last edited by JDE; January 29th, 2008 at 00:25. |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |