![]() |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago
Posts: 790
|
Can someone give me the general gist of how an Inertial Navigation System (INS) works? Thanks, Dave |
| |
| | #2 |
| Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: chicago
Posts: 4,232
|
I'm sure many people will be able to expand and correct greatly... but here goes it's a system that incorporates precise measuring equipment to measure the amount of movement of the aircraft (acceleration in a particular direction); it combines the data with a map to give information the pilot can use; it gives a very accurate picture of where you are; the entire system is self contained, it dosen't need satellites or ground based signals to operate, however over time it accumulates error (much like the HI), and needs to be calibrated over a specific point (like a VOR). |
| |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: FL
Posts: 922
|
INS is a closed loop nav system. It is guided by gyros, on upscale units, these are laser ring gyros. You spin up the INS, allow it to stabilize (gyros spinning and stabilized) and give it your starting point. That's why you see at some hardstands a lat/long of that particular hard stand. On the ship, we plugged in a cable that was hooked up to the ship's INS (SINS) that told our INS where it was. It then uses the percieved motion to navigate. Older units strictly work with Lat/Long, newer ones input that into the FMC/FMC and are synced with the nav database. When we had alert launches, we often had the engines turning and everything ready to go (<5 minutes) but had to wait a few for the INS to stabilize. If it dumped in flight, you had to initialize with a GPS fix, a TACAN fix (VOR + DME from known point) or a RADAR fix (radar fix on known landmark, ie point of an island). It's slick, it's expensive, and it's fairly transparent once you set it up. Chunk |
| |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: FL
Posts: 922
|
Oh yeah...sometimes Doppler nav units are tied to INS's. Doppler nav shoots the equivalent of a RADAR wave at whatever you are flying over (ground, water) and gives the INS a secondary source of direction and speed to back up the gyros. INS can be *very* accurate on it's own....INS's on subs operate for weeks without outside reference (GPS fixes) and are accurate well within a boatlength. Chunk |
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago
Posts: 790
|
Thanks, I'm thinking mainly of the INS that you would find in a commercial jet. Pretty cool though. Dave |
| |
| | #6 |
| Agent Smith |
Well, basically most jets use IRS which is "inertial reference system" basically the same thing as an INS but there are no moving parts. An IRS uses "laser ring gyros" which work off the principal that you can measure microscopic bending of a laser light when an aircraft accelerates/moves/etc in particular axes. If the plane pitches up, the laser ring pitch gyro is going to measure the laser bend, compute a pitch displacement and determine a new pitch/roll/bank/airspeed/displacement. Actually, I kind of consider it "PFM" - pure friggen magic! ![]() We've got IRS in all of our MD-90s, most of our -88's but some of our -88's have a "map shift deluxomatic" AHRS system... Uhh, let's just leave it at that! |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |