![]() |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 60
|
OK. So here is the scenario: N123AB departs XYZ on an IFR flight plan flying runway heading and is handed off to departure. Departure controller reports radar contact turn right Hdg 270, climb and maintain 4,000. Leveling at 4000 the controller says turn right, heading 230 contact approach 123.45. Pilot of N123AB checks on level 4000. The flight is a repositioning flight to a satellite airport about 25nm away and usual practice is to clear the flight through Class B airspace and through a corridor over the main airport on a heading of 180. As the flight progresses the pilot realizes the heading he is on is not taking him directly over the top of the main airport but he assumes the controller has reasons for not issuing a heading of 180. However, being cautious, our hero keys the mic and broadcasts to the controller that N123AB is on a 230 heading - FYI! The controller does not respond to this radio call and is then busy with other aircraft. Suddenly the Traffic system in N123AB alerts the pilot to traffic bearing down on him - it is too late, he realizes he is slap in the arrival path of airliners on approach to the main airport and they are within 1 - 200 feet of his altitude. The controller now comes alive and begins issuing traffic alerts to the pilot of N123AB. The situation is not good and a large airliner has to take evasive action but doesn't have to completely abort the approach. After things have settled down the pilot of N123AB calls the controller once again. The controller does not reply, so our hero tries again and then a third time. Finally the controller responds and our hero asks the controller if he missed an instruction. The controller replies, no you didn't - I missed turning you, but thanks for helping me out avoiding all that traffic. Now! This is not to try and figure out who was at fault but to look at how this could be avoided and here are a few questions to help us along: 1 When checking on with a controller when the flight is on an assigned heading is it imperative that the pilot inform the controller of his heading, even if he wasn't asked to do so by the previous controller? 2 Do controllers automatically inform the next sector of the flight's altitude and heading (if on an assigned vector) 3 What would you as the pilot do? Would you turn to the heading that you assume is going to be given - i.e. 180 as you know that is where you are supposed to be. 4 Do you think the pilot did enough to get the controller's attention and alert him to the fact that he thought the flight was headed into danger? Thanks BP244 |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| MODERATOR | Quote:
Last edited by SteveC; July 20th, 2008 at 08:06. Reason: Circumventing software filter - unapproved. | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Montana/UND
Posts: 429
| So this was essentially a true story?
__________________ Air Traffic Controller's motto----If the clouds are low and thick, pick up the phone and call in sick. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Winchestertonfieldville
Posts: 6,736
|
The controller can take the heat for his 'lack of', I on the other hand have a responsibility for the safe operation of a flight as PIC which is clearly stated in FAR 91.3. When checking in I'll always state my last assigned heading for example, Jetcareers Center Cessa 1234 level 4000, 185 heading assigned. If Mr. Controller wants to put me or my ship in harms way, I'll damn near turn it and let him deal with it.
__________________ The simplest answer tends to be correct. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 60
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| MODERATOR | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 259
| Quote:
I'll tell you what gives me the chills.... a guy with the screen name of ATLTRACON saying that he had the chills after watching the tapes. Yikes!!! That's not good. Not good at all. Have you gone over the top of ATL since this incident?
__________________ Chuck Norris does not hunt because hunting implies the possibility of failure. Chuck Norris goes killing. | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Montana/UND
Posts: 429
| Yeah, I read the ATO briefing pages on Monday. Very busy/hectic weekend at a a few facilities. It was just minute after minute of OE/D's.
__________________ Air Traffic Controller's motto----If the clouds are low and thick, pick up the phone and call in sick. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 272
| Quote:
Also, do you know someone by the name of Buzz there at A80? | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Montana/UND
Posts: 429
| I believe the tapes are kept for a minimum of 45 days. Some places keep them a few days longer, but it just depends on the on how much extra the facility wants.
__________________ Air Traffic Controller's motto----If the clouds are low and thick, pick up the phone and call in sick. |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 60
| Quote:
However when the controller sees the tail number I'll probably be vectored into PDK via Augusta!!!!! Ha ha ha! | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 75
| Buzz retired about a year ago and is enjoying the good life in Florida. |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 75
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 |
| MODERATOR | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Southern Mecca
Posts: 719
| Quote:
Never could get the last word in with Buzz.
__________________ "Consideration is an extension of safety. It begins with the first contact with our passengers, no matter where this is—reservations, porter, ticket agent or wherever." C.E. Woolman | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |