![]() | |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: UK
Posts: 62
|
For commercial aircraft, (passenger/cargo jets and props), by regulation, how often are they weighed on aircraft scales for weight and balance purposes? And is this normally done in house by technicians or outsourced to commercial contractors? And how long does take process take? |
| |
| | #2 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Edge of stall
Posts: 39
| Quote:
here is a little more info http://www.weighing-systems.com/Tech...tweighing.html | |
| |
| | #3 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: KHIO
Posts: 197
|
For on demand: Sec. 135.185 Empty weight and center of gravity: Currency requirement. (a) No person may operate a multiengine aircraft unless the current empty weight and center of gravity are calculated from values established by actual weighing of the aircraft within the preceding 36 calendar months. (b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to-- (1) Aircraft issued an original airworthiness certificate within the preceding 36 calendar months; and (2) Aircraft operated under a weight and balance system approved in the operations specifications of the certificate holder. I Cannot find one for part 121 or scheduled airlines but I am pretty sure that they have similar requirements. It is also correct that aircraft operating under part 91 do not require any updates on weighing except after major alterations where the weight additions cannot be accurately tracked. Seth |
| |
| | #4 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Edge of stall
Posts: 39
| Quote:
http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache...&ct=clnk&gl=us | |
| |
| | #5 | |||
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: x
Posts: 1,087
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself | |||
| |
| | #6 |
| Old Skool |
I always wonder how incorrect our weight calculations are. You have so many variables from the dust, sand, sodas, napkins, cups, amount of waste on the lav, magazines in the seats, etc. Then you have the times where we have been literally 1lb under MTOW. Chances are in reality we are over the MTOW #. Im guessing some genius engineer has figured out all of this though.
__________________ What have you done lately to better your career? |
| |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: x
Posts: 1,087
| There are procedures for readying the airplane to be weighed. Usually fuel and lav tanks are emptied, oil and hydraulic reservoirs are filled, the cabin is cleaned and any non-aircraft stuff like magazines and drinks are removed. Of course, you can never get all the dust and coins and other trash out, but the results are fairly repeatable between weighings.
__________________ I wish my lawn was emo so it would cut itself |
| |
| | #8 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Edge of stall
Posts: 39
| To find the new empty weight of an aircraft, the weighing procedures must be followed to the letter. Normally the aircraft is defueled down to unusable fuel, all systems are serviced full (from O2 to engine oil), all required equipments installed, aircraft is cleaned off of all the bird crap and other grimes (whatever remains will become part of the new EW), all panels installed and all protective covers removed. Regardless of the method of weighing used (jack cells or weighing platforms) the aircraft is then leveled. exact procedures to be followed for each aircraft will be in detail in the respective aircrat maintenance manual. The Aircraft is weighted inside a hanger with the doors close (a slight breeze across the wings will lower the empty weight). Minimum of three readings are taken and then averaged. The new CG is calculated, the weight and balance sheet updated, and a proper logbook entry is made. |
| |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member |
to be honest with you I've never understood why it's not a requirement to weigh part 91 airplanes at least, like, once every 10 years or so...
|
| |
| | #10 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Joo-know
Posts: 3,510
| Yeah...especially after you've seen the results of actually weighing them. At the old Flite Skool we did that and lost like 20 lbs of useful load on a Lance.
__________________ Cheechako. |
| |
| | #11 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
.There's one 172 I've flown that next time it's in for annual it's definitely getting weighed. I took the boss' neice, nephew and brother for a ride in it and though we were in C.G. and close to, but not over max gross, it scared the hell out of me. I've been close to gross before and even at gross without issues, but anemic doesn't even begin to describe this. Comparing the numbers later, it had 100lbs more useful load than any other 172 we have... I find that highly suspect. Rounding and math errors over 35 years can really make a difference! | |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |