![]() | |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Cape May, NJ
Posts: 139
|
Lately I've been thinking about joining the Air Force to help pay college expenses and such. I was looking at the Physical requirements on this site, and it said that a pilot needed to have 20/20 UNCORRECTED near sight vision. I'm near sighted, and wear contact lenses. Is there an exception for contacts? Does this mean anyone without perfect near sight vision can't become a pilot in the Air Force? Also, it says no allergies after the age of 12... I have several food allergies and airborne allergies. Is this what they are talking about? |
| |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Busan, Korea
Posts: 308
|
For both AF and Navy, you don't need 20/20 uncorrected. For the AF it's 20/70 correctable to 20/20 and for the Navy, 20/40 correctable to 20/20. There is a certain dioptec measurement/maximum in that as well. I'm not a flight doc or eye doc so I don't know. Try searching at www.baseops.net for the AF and www.airwarriors.com for the Navy. However, search first before asking. The question has been asked over and over on those sites. Might find the answer with the allergy thing as well.
|
| |
| | #3 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Cape May, NJ
Posts: 139
|
Ok, thanks.
|
| |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,279
|
Awhile back I posted a link to the regulation that spells out all the requirements. See if you can find it; if not I'll try to find it this weekend. Many things are waiverable.
|
| |
| | #5 |
| Old Skool |
There extra requirements for fighter guys, arm curls, leg press, etc. They take a percentage of your body weight and you have to do at least X amount.
__________________ College Student. CFI soon. PUNBAT 8. 92.3% WQ. "The good old days weren't all that good, and tomorrow's not as bad as it seems" |
| |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Busan, Korea
Posts: 308
| What? Not in the Navy, very bad gouge. Never even heard of that in the Air Force. AF fighter types might be able to enlighten us but as far as the Navy goes, thats BS!!.
|
| |
| | #7 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Chicago
Posts: 12
| Quote:
http://www.hamletthouse.com/html/supt__phase_1.html | |
| |
| | #8 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NAS Meridian, MS
Posts: 745
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #9 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,279
| Quote:
When I went through in '04-'05, they made everyone take it at the beginning of UPT; not sure if they still do. It's NOT a difficult test; hell even I passed it. | |
| |
| | #10 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Busan, Korea
Posts: 308
| Quote:
). Problem with the net is you get responses from folks who find their info on the internet as opposed to have done it.
| |
| |
| | #11 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
__________________ College Student. CFI soon. PUNBAT 8. 92.3% WQ. "The good old days weren't all that good, and tomorrow's not as bad as it seems" | |
| |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Busan, Korea
Posts: 308
| |
| |
| | #13 | |
| Administrator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Pinal Airpark, AZ (KMZJ)
Posts: 14,902
| Quote:
This was the late-90s, so it may have changed.
__________________ You want answers? | |
| |
| | #14 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,279
| Quote:
BTW, here are the Air Force regs that apply to medical standards; Vol. 3 applies specifically to flyers. http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/share...FI48-123v1.pdf http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/share...FI48-123v2.pdf http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/share...FI48-123v3.pdf Last edited by germb747; August 14th, 2009 at 15:01. Reason: add AFI | |
| |
| | #15 |
| Old Skool | Seem to know more about it than you obviously. Thank you.
__________________ College Student. CFI soon. PUNBAT 8. 92.3% WQ. "The good old days weren't all that good, and tomorrow's not as bad as it seems" |
| |
| | #16 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Busan, Korea
Posts: 308
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Busan, Korea
Posts: 308
| Not so fast wannabe. The original question had nothing to do with this subject. Now, with regards to the test brought up, you found the info on the net because you have never gone to UPT, correct? How do you know it was correct if you haven't been? You don't know jack except what the net says, easy enough for me as well. You haven't been there done that, freaking wannabe putting in two cents where he shouldn't. Luckily we have some real Air Force types who can adequately provide accurate info.
|
| |
| | #18 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NAS Meridian, MS
Posts: 745
| To soften Bunk22's blow, I think most of us have seen a lot of bad gouge passed around by applicants and other hopefuls, often to the detriment of others. I'm a Navy dude and thus have little knowledge about how the AF does business, but I too was holding out for someone currently in UPT to comment. There are a whole lot of myths floating around among the general public about what it takes to fly military jets, and to be honest, from my perspective knowing what I know about my pipeline (Navy jets), your comment seemed a little suspect. Nothing to take personally
|
| |
| | #19 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: LRAFB... for now
Posts: 107
| |
| |
| | #20 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Busan, Korea
Posts: 308
| Quote:
That's right, bad gouge on the net so the only real information is from those who have been there. I've heard civilians in the last year quote things like to be a figher pilot, have to go to the AF academy; or you have to have 20/20 uncorrected to fly jets; only engineers are pilots or you at least have to be great in math; only the number pilot in his class goes jets; etc, etc.
Last edited by bunk22; August 15th, 2009 at 19:20. | |
| |
| | #21 |
| Senior Member |
In UPT now... we took the FACT on Day 3 of Phase 1....the guys that went T-38s took it again at the start of Phase 3...those of us that went T-1s didnt have to take it again.
__________________ Ian |
| |
| | #22 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,279
|
Just took my annual flight physical yesterday. Man, at 29 that eye chart wasn't quite as easy to read as it was last year
|
| |
| | #23 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Busan, Korea
Posts: 308
| Quote:
I just kept pressing the button then got spoken to for doing it. Though this FACT thing has nothing to do with the original question, it sounds like a test that all UPT guys have to do. Nothing like it for primary flight training and nothing like it when I flew T-2C's. We pulled up to 6.5g's on many occasion and never did anything like it. I'm going to be an IP in Kingsville next year and I'll see if there is something like it in T-45's. I'm kind of a bid dude anyway so I've never had problems with the g thing but I'm getting old now so it may not be so true anymore | |
| |
| | #24 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NAS Meridian, MS
Posts: 745
|
Not only that but it was only recently when they started making T-45 studs do the 'fuge before winging. This syllabus will take you right up to 7.3 G's (structural limit) in ACM, which previously was without any prior training or g conditioning. Maybe AF g's feel different |
| |
| | #25 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,279
| Quote:
Last edited by germb747; August 17th, 2009 at 10:27. | |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |