Jetcareers

Go Back   Jetcareers > Employment > Jobs Available

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 30th, 2004, 22:02   #1
aloft
Old Skool
 
aloft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cottonwood Heights, UT
Posts: 8,388
Default A320 FO -- JetBlue

FO position(s) posted to their site yesterday.

https://jetblue.recruitmax.com/ENG/c...turnToSearch=1
aloft is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 3rd, 2004, 12:32   #2
Lurker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

I sure would like to work for them someday. They seem pretty strict on their requirements.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 4th, 2004, 00:21   #3
hammer
Junior Member
 
hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 200
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

From what I can tell, they want you to have 1000 hours in 20,000 pound+ types to apply for a F/O job on the ERJ ... never heard that one before to work on a regional jet.
hammer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 4th, 2004, 02:29   #4
aloft
Old Skool
 
aloft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cottonwood Heights, UT
Posts: 8,388
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

They're not hiring into the EMB yet, nobody knows what their reqs for those jobs will be. This post is for A320 FOs.
aloft is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 4th, 2004, 09:06   #5
Jason
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,089
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
From what I can tell, they want you to have 1000 hours in 20,000 pound+ types to apply for a F/O job on the ERJ ... never heard that one before to work on a regional jet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you consider a DC-9 a 'Regional Jet'????? If I'm not mistaken the first DC-9's had less than 90 seats. I know US Air's DC-9's only had a handful more seats than 90. 20,000 pounds isn't really that big of an airplane - just about the only thing in the airline world that is smaller is the BE1900. Even the Dash 8 is 34,500. What they're really saying is they are looking for people with previous experience in the 121 world or in the bigger corporate equipment. Yeah this post is for A320 FO's but I think that's a prefectly legitimate requirement for ERJ190 FO's as well - the 190 is a pretty good size aircraft - what's wrong with the company seeking people with a little bit of experience???

Jason
Jason is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 4th, 2004, 20:56   #6
kellwolf
Old Skool
 
kellwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 17,873
Send a message via AIM to kellwolf
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
. What they're really saying is they are looking for people with previous experience in the 121 world or in the bigger corporate equipment.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unless it IS in a B1900, then it doesn't count. Seriously, I know a guy that has the mins and the PIC in a B1900, and JetBlue told him it wouldn't count since it didn't meet the weight reqs......
kellwolf is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 4th, 2004, 23:12   #7
jonnyb
Senior Member
 
jonnyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,304
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
Unless it IS in a B1900, then it doesn't count. Seriously, I know a guy that has the mins and the PIC in a B1900, and JetBlue told him it wouldn't count since it didn't meet the weight reqs......

[/ QUOTE ]
Look at the market right now. Saturated with very experienced pilots with LOTS of jet time. JET time in JETS that weigh well over 20K lbs. I think part of what their (jetblue) getting at, is they want someone with some "larger" JET time. Make sense? Hope this helps.
jonnyb is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 5th, 2004, 12:27   #8
hammer
Junior Member
 
hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 200
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

I could be wrong but would this be the first regional that requires time at all (let alone 1000 hours minimum) in 20,000 pound+ aircraft to apply? I know that they haven't officially recategorized their soon to be delivered RJ fleet into a independent regional airline but it seems to me that this will be a first.
hammer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 5th, 2004, 14:04   #9
Jason
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,089
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
I could be wrong but would this be the first regional that requires time at all (let alone 1000 hours minimum) in 20,000 pound+ aircraft to apply? I know that they haven't officially recategorized their soon to be delivered RJ fleet into a independent regional airline but it seems to me that this will be a first.

[/ QUOTE ]

JetBlue is not a regional airline. It is in fact, based on revenue, now a major airline.

Jason
Jason is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 5th, 2004, 14:12   #10
hammer
Junior Member
 
hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 200
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I could be wrong but would this be the first regional that requires time at all (let alone 1000 hours minimum) in 20,000 pound+ aircraft to apply? I know that they haven't officially recategorized their soon to be delivered RJ fleet into a independent regional airline but it seems to me that this will be a first.

[/ QUOTE ]

JetBlue is not a regional airline. It is in fact, based on revenue, now a major airline.

Jason

[/ QUOTE ]

Read my post closer ... I never said JetBlue was a regional airline. I'm talking about the RJ's once they take delivery of them. Whether the RJ's and the Airbus fleet will remain together under the JetBlue umbrella or whether they will create a separate entity for the RJ's that will keep their financials apart from their mainline Airbus fleet is what I'm talking about. My point is that I don't think there are any airline jobs in the US where the pilots applying to fly a regional jet must have 1000 hours of time in aircraft weighing 20,000+ pounds.
hammer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 5th, 2004, 14:41   #11
jonnyb
Senior Member
 
jonnyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,304
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

Your post IS understood. However, this is the fact right now. Nothing has been said at all about the RJ hiring requirements. I believe you're right, we'll have to wait and see how they are going to structure things when the EMB's come on line. So for now, this applies..... [ QUOTE ]
This post is for A320 FOs.

[/ QUOTE ]
jonnyb is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 5th, 2004, 15:29   #12
Lurker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
I could be wrong but would this be the first regional that requires time at all...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes you did say Jetblue is a regional.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 5th, 2004, 19:59   #13
hammer
Junior Member
 
hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 200
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I could be wrong but would this be the first regional that requires time at all ..... I know that they haven't officially recategorized their soon to be delivered RJ fleet into a independent regional airline ....

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes you did say Jetblue is a regional.

[/ QUOTE ]

Give me a break dude and learn to read the entire post. I said they "would" be the first regional (not they "are" the first regional) as in if they recategorized their RJ fleet into a separate regional airline, they'd be the first to require time like that. I think I've beaten this dead horse enough.
hammer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 6th, 2004, 14:16   #14
Lurker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I could be wrong but would this be the first regional that requires time at all ..... I know that they haven't officially recategorized their soon to be delivered RJ fleet into a independent regional airline ....

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes you did say Jetblue is a regional.

[/ QUOTE ]

Give me a break dude and learn to read the entire post. I said they "would" be the first regional (not they "are" the first regional) as in if they recategorized their RJ fleet into a separate regional airline, they'd be the first to require time like that. I think I've beaten this dead horse enough.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just pulling your strings ( or is it legs?).
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 18th, 2004, 01:30   #15
Propilot
Senior Member
 
Propilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 441
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I could be wrong but would this be the first regional that requires time at all ..... I know that they haven't officially recategorized their soon to be delivered RJ fleet into a independent regional airline ....

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes you did say Jetblue is a regional.

[/ QUOTE ]

Give me a break dude and learn to read the entire post. I said they "would" be the first regional (not they "are" the first regional) as in if they recategorized their RJ fleet into a separate regional airline, they'd be the first to require time like that. I think I've beaten this dead horse enough.

[/ QUOTE ]


Not uh! Loyd LOYD LOYD!!!
Propilot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 18th, 2004, 09:26   #16
mtsu_av8er
Old Skool
 
mtsu_av8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bach's Arco Pitcairn
Posts: 13,404
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
Not uh! Loyd LOYD LOYD!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

A dead horse is never too beaten.....
mtsu_av8er is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old December 25th, 2004, 23:26   #17
I_Money
Moderator
 
I_Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Socal
Posts: 6,062
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

Being a start up their insurance rates are quite high - therefore they hire experienced crews so the rates do not go through the roof.
I_Money is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old January 16th, 2005, 22:27   #18
Vingus
Junior Member
 
Vingus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

Are you sure this is the reason for the steep requirements? I bet this 20,000 lb thing pisses off the fighter guys.
Vingus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old January 16th, 2005, 22:40   #19
jonnyb
Senior Member
 
jonnyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,304
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

MikeD can verify but I'm pretty sure MOST fighters weigh well over 20Klbs.
jonnyb is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old January 16th, 2005, 22:41   #20
BCTAv8r
Old Skool
 
BCTAv8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,113
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

This is seriously my dream job in the airlines. My top airline goal is to make Jetblue A320 Capt.
BCTAv8r is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old January 16th, 2005, 23:49   #21
RABIRZA69
Senior Member
 
RABIRZA69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 627
Send a message via AIM to RABIRZA69
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
They're not hiring into the EMB yet, nobody knows what their reqs for those jobs will be. This post is for A320 FOs.

[/ QUOTE ]

from what i understand from my inside sources the hiring mins are going to be lower not dramatically but definately lower. not low enough where a cfi can pop in a resume but low enough.

to answer the other question B6 will not be creating a separate entity for its RJ's to protect the A320's the RJ's are being implented to pretty much connect the dots.
RABIRZA69 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old January 17th, 2005, 17:46   #22
kellwolf
Old Skool
 
kellwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 17,873
Send a message via AIM to kellwolf
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
for its RJ's to protect the A320's the RJ's are being implented to pretty much connect the dots.


[/ QUOTE ]

Not to nitpick, but why are people referring to the 190 as an RJ? Just b/c it's made my Embraer? Might as well call the B717 and DC-9 (yeah, I know same thing) an RJ. jetBlue's lack of low minimums on the airframe just reinforces that idea.
kellwolf is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old January 19th, 2005, 23:32   #23
Bigey
Old Skool
 
Bigey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 3,913
Send a message via AIM to Bigey
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
for its RJ's to protect the A320's the RJ's are being implented to pretty much connect the dots.


[/ QUOTE ]

Not to nitpick, but why are people referring to the 190 as an RJ? Just b/c it's made my Embraer? Might as well call the B717 and DC-9 (yeah, I know same thing) an RJ. jetBlue's lack of low minimums on the airframe just reinforces that idea.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because from my understanding, its included in its name? I thought ERJ always standed for Embraer Regional Jet, hence the RJ referal. Thats just my understanding though, it was specifically classified as an RJ. Boeing and Airbus and such, just wanted to fill the space in for the 100 passenger area? Someone correct me, if im wrong!?
Bigey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old January 20th, 2005, 00:55   #24
jonnyb
Senior Member
 
jonnyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,304
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

The 170, 190 and 195 are not ERJ's. They're not called that, don't think they ever were. They are identified as EMB-170, EMB-190 and EMB-195. EMB standing for Embraer, the manufacturer.
jonnyb is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Old January 20th, 2005, 07:23   #25
BCTAv8r
Old Skool
 
BCTAv8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,113
Default Re: A320 FO -- JetBlue

Embraer standing for Empresa Brasileira Aeronautica
BCTAv8r is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



find jetcareers on:

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2009 jetcareers.com