![]() |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member | Wondering what your predictions are on the airline industry both short and long term. With the cost of fuel constantly on the uprise, furloughs, and airlines that have and could potentially close, etc...I can't help but to wonder what is going to happen to the future of the airline industry. I see a lot of stats that mention airline travel increased 7% from 2006 (Just an example), and that the predictions of air travel are going stay on the rise. What are your thoughts? Is there still a bright light at the end of the road for pilots and airline companies?
__________________ "The tragedy of life doesn't lie in not reaching your goals! The tragedy lies in having no goals to reach." http://abovethehorizon-tlp.blogspot.com/ |
| |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool | Bright Light. Fares will increase, and guess what. . .load factors will remain consistent with year over year trends. |
| |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member | The problem really isn't market demand. It's operating cost. Passenger travel despite an increasingly problematic economy is still increasing but so is cost. And the cost is increasing faster then the demand for services. The industry's economy can't keep up. So in all likelihood we'll be facing very significant reductions in capacity with the associated woes including staff reductions from the cockpit to the bag room. Airlines will have no choice, they will either have to scale back or go under. And this isn't in my opinion going to be temporary by any means. I really can't see it going any other way in light of the new oil economy.
__________________ Having a very very hard time to find anything to give a crap about these days.....( only as far as Mexican Beer goes that is.. )
|
| |
| | #4 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: ATL
Posts: 1,693
| Quote:
__________________ Comm-ASEL, MEL, Inst. CFI, CFII, MEI TT: 700 Part 121 ATR72 FO B.S. Aviation Management-Business Minor Southeastern Oklahoma State University Cum Laude Graduate | |
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member | It's not an issue of demand. It's all about cost. If demand and cost increased at the same comparative rate, we have a mute issue. But when cost is increasing exponentially over demand we have an economic imbalance that can't be kept up with. I'll simplify my point. If one passenger uses 1 gallon of jet A, you have a good one to one balance and you can price accordingly. But if for every passenger added, the cost of each gallon per passenger increases then you have a problem. So let's say every month you add one passenger, but every week, each gallon increases in cost by say 10%. Do you see where this is going? That in a very simplified essence is what the industry is dealing with right now. So demand is pretty much irrelevant in light of the cost increase.
__________________ Having a very very hard time to find anything to give a crap about these days.....( only as far as Mexican Beer goes that is.. )
|
| |
| | #6 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,182
| Yeah but you've got to get the passengers to their international flight. They don't all live at the hubs!
__________________ Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress in this period in history. |
| |
| | #7 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: ATL
Posts: 1,693
| Exactly, scale domestic back to the point that they are hub feeders for international flights.
__________________ Comm-ASEL, MEL, Inst. CFI, CFII, MEI TT: 700 Part 121 ATR72 FO B.S. Aviation Management-Business Minor Southeastern Oklahoma State University Cum Laude Graduate |
| |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member | Er...That's pretty much how domestic flying is already structured. No one flys outstation to outstation any more. In fact I may be wrong, but I'm not sure if any of the legacy airlines ever really did.
__________________ Having a very very hard time to find anything to give a crap about these days.....( only as far as Mexican Beer goes that is.. )
|
| |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,122
| I think that Bombardier is going to sell a lot more Q-400s. I think there is going to be a significent change in the types of airframes regional airlines purchase from this point forward. Why did they buy the first regional jets in the first place? Because they were faster? Because the maintenance is cheaper on turbofans? Maybe is a factor but in my opinion (albeit one that may very well be ignorant) it had a lot to do with the fact that the American public didn't like flying on "dinky little prop" planes. We're going to see I think larger RJs like the CR7 and CR9 whose economies make more sense and more turboprops where the airline is going to realize they can't afford to placate the dumb passenger's fear of a turboprop airplane. I really like the turboprop idea but I think we have to be pretty careful with the larger "regional jet" idea -- it wouldn't be far from a CRJ1000 or E-170 to a A320 under a regional airline which would be a disaster.
__________________ Yet Another Turboprop FO* |
| |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Antonio TX or anywhere Uncle Sugar wants me....
Posts: 776
| Ummm, hello?! Did you not get the memo?!? I know it has been posted on here at least 14 times in the last 24 hours.... Well, since you didn't, here is the deal........ The sky is falling!!!!!!! Yes... ![]() Actually, I do think like the rest of the economy, there is going to be continued "correction". How much? Who knows. What is the GNP going to do? What is the dollar going to do? How many more high paying jobs will be outsourced? How many kids are you going to have? How old will we all live to be? A simple point...there are way too many variables to determine even (in my opinion) a somewhat realistic prediction. The stats say it all...47% of all statistics are made up on the spot (including this one). As has been said before: Plan for the worst and hope for the best...ESPECIALLY in aviation!!!
__________________ "Capitalism without bankruptcy is like Christianity without hell." -Frank Borman, Former CEO Eastern Airlines |
| |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member | If a regional aircraft gets much bigger then a 90 seat regional jet it won't be a regional jet any longer. And it would seem that a trend towards more T-props will start showing it's face but that would actually make sense. And well, making sense is something that airlines rarely do.
__________________ Having a very very hard time to find anything to give a crap about these days.....( only as far as Mexican Beer goes that is.. )
|
| |
| | #12 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,841
| Quote:
__________________ A self described gym rat. "I got next." | |
| |
| | #13 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #14 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 33
| My prediction is that the industry will significantly worsen over the next decade or two, due in part to the rising costs of fossil fuels. But as soon as the next generation of ultra-fuel efficient propulsion technology has significant market penetration, operating costs will finally decrease. This will allow the airlines to lower airfare, which in turn will attract more customers, and yield higher profits. Welcome to the golden age of commercial aviation. |
| |
| | #15 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 141
| Any of these predictions are worth what you paid for them. Here is mine. Sometime in the future, we as a country will start to evolve a cohesive energy policy, (that does not include secret meetings at the whitehouse with oil executives) that will include a *greatly* increased railroad infrastructure. (high speed trains, electrically powered) More nuclear power plants will sooner or later be required. Oil will go up significantly from where it is now. Two decades from now, most domestic flying will be in advanced turboprops. And it will be very pricey, and greatly reduced. Sooner or later the realities of a limited resource will force realignment of everything. How soon and when, no one really knows. But- I firmly believe that what aviation looks like today will be vastly different in 15 or so years. Or maybe not. ![]() |
| |
| | #16 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Utopia
Posts: 12,403
| Nobody wants to admit it, but I can predict exactly what will happen. Every single person involved with the industry is going to die. Every person. So will their families, pets, and neighbors. I hate to bring the bad news, but it's true.
__________________ ![]() ------- "Sadness bears no remedy for the problems in your life." |
| |
| | #17 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 11
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #18 |
| Senior Member | I too would agree that Itchy's forecast has some merit to it. Hell, already today we have advanced diesel electric locomotives that literally get over 300 miles per one gallon of fuel. But rail has bigger limitations then air travel and I don't see it as a replacement for pax travel. Because as you said you would have to build the infrastructure. And even interconnecting existing rail lines to provide high speed pax service to the same number of cities and towns that have scheduled air carrier service today would be a monumental undertaking vs creating new pax lines altogether.
__________________ Having a very very hard time to find anything to give a crap about these days.....( only as far as Mexican Beer goes that is.. )
|
| |
| | #19 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 367
| If anyone gets their prediction right, contact me. I could use your talent in predicting which stocks to buy where I can turn $100k into $1,000,000 in a short 6 months. And then turn it into $1,000,000,000 over the next 30 years. ![]() |
| |
| | #20 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
![]() | |
| |
| | #21 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: _
Posts: 5,178
| Quote:
![]()
__________________ "It takes just as much time to be nice to someone as it does to be a jerk." | |
| |
| | #22 |
| Junior Member | Don't Believe the Hype |
| |
| | #23 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
![]() Now with that said as Eddie Murphy eloquently put it we should all just have a coke and smile and...........
__________________ "I have learned over the years that when one's mind is made up, that diminshes fear" - Rosa Parks | |
| |
| | #24 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 332
| Quote:
The regionals will trend towards larger jets and/or turboprops. They will continue to replace the domestic portion of their partner's flying. The majors will reduce domestic capacity, see above, in favor of international routes. Corporations and the rich will keep expanding their use of private aircraft. Although this one area could be adversely affected by high cost of Jet-A. With open skies coming to the USA one or more of the Legacy carriers will be unable to compete and be forced to merge or liquidate. Open skies starts March 30th, 2008. Phase II will be even more interesting as cabotage is certainly going to be on the table. If you want to fly pax then you will have to choose the major you fly for wisely. The competition to Europe is going to be fierce so the airlines with more of their operation in the Pacific and South America will do better. Look for Southernjets to really get hurt with open skies. They desperately need the NWA Asian route structure to be a viable airline going forward. If you want a good airline job then look to Fedex and UPS as the best career option. Typhoonpilot | |
| |
| | #25 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 50
| What he said..... In the long term... the so called regionals we be the vast majority of the domestic feed for Legacy carriers..... its what they have wanted all along..... and they just might get it. |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |