jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > General > General Topics

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 15th, 2008, 18:44   #1
Toria
Senior Member
 
Toria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 787
Default Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

I observed this from the ground (horse arena) this morning. The arena is approximately 18 miles north of TUS.

Large two engine plane (Boeing?) escorted by at least three small planes (think dots next to big plane) heading approximately 110 or 120 at altitude. Military(?) planes were two on the left, one on the right. I cannot guess what altitude because I was on the ground. However, a CRJ heading approximately 320 or 330 out of TUS passed almost directly underneath at maybe FL12 or FL13. I am just making the assumption that this took place at cruise altitude. They passed almost directly over my ground position.

Any ideas? It caught my eye and I thought the whole scene was just very "interesting".
__________________
Toria
Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail -Ralph Waldo Emerson
www.CorpAngelNetwork.org
Toria is offline  
Old March 15th, 2008, 19:31   #2
mikecweb
Old Skool
 
mikecweb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: KBOS
Posts: 2,610
Send a message via AIM to mikecweb Send a message via Yahoo to mikecweb Send a message via Skype™ to mikecweb
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toria View Post
I observed this from the ground (horse arena) this morning. The arena is approximately 18 miles north of TUS.

Large two engine plane (Boeing?) escorted by at least three small planes (think dots next to big plane) heading approximately 110 or 120 at altitude. Military(?) planes were two on the left, one on the right. I cannot guess what altitude because I was on the ground. However, a CRJ heading approximately 320 or 330 out of TUS passed almost directly underneath at maybe FL12 or FL13. I am just making the assumption that this took place at cruise altitude. They passed almost directly over my ground position.

Any ideas? It caught my eye and I thought the whole scene was just very "interesting".
My guess would be an Aerial Refueling mission.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by scflyin View Post
Three out of four doctors will say that RJ's are the leading cause of SJS.
mikecweb is offline  
Old March 15th, 2008, 19:37   #3
PGT
Old Skool
 
PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DSM
Posts: 2,950
Send a message via AIM to PGT
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikecweb View Post
My guess would be an Aerial Refueling mission.
Yep my guess too
__________________
PPL 55 hours TT
PGT is offline  
Old March 15th, 2008, 20:26   #4
aloft
Old Skool
 
aloft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Inside your OODA loop
Posts: 6,723
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Yup, probably a KC-10.
__________________
Commercial Pilot, ASEL/AMEL/IA
Chief Pilot, aerial mapping company
Mountain-qualified Search & Rescue/Disaster Relief Mission Pilot, Civil Air Patrol
850+ TT/25 ME
B.S., Psychology, University of Utah
aloft is offline  
Old March 15th, 2008, 20:29   #5
frog_flyer
Old Skool
 
frog_flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FTW
Posts: 3,932
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to frog_flyer
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Maybe usafplt will weigh in if there's a tanker track on the route in question!
__________________
Charter Member - JC Pilot Motion Picture Society (JC PiMPS)

"There needs to be more drinking here on JC. We need more ******* partying!" -Doug Taylor
frog_flyer is offline  
Old March 15th, 2008, 21:33   #6
Rocketman99
Senior Member
 
Rocketman99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: LGA
Posts: 947
Send a message via AIM to Rocketman99 Send a message via MSN to Rocketman99
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

There are several over AZ and one near enough by.
__________________
NKAWTG...N!

Dammit, I gotta do black recurrent AGAIN! - Dough on AIM
Rocketman99 is offline  
Old March 15th, 2008, 21:36   #7
Toria
Senior Member
 
Toria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 787
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikecweb View Post
My guess would be an Aerial Refueling mission.
I have seen many a film clip from the boom operator's perspective. You've also made me feel better about my eyesight! I am glad I had the peripheral awareness to spot the scene. Thanks!

So, it was really the tanker escorting the dots! Another fine example of considering all the options. Dots too small to even make out their silhouette.
__________________
Toria
Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail -Ralph Waldo Emerson
www.CorpAngelNetwork.org

Last edited by Toria; March 15th, 2008 at 21:42. Reason: added sarcasm
Toria is offline  
Old March 16th, 2008, 01:59   #8
Hacker15e
Senior Member
 
Hacker15e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 830
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Quote:
Originally Posted by frog_flyer View Post
Maybe usafplt will weigh in if there's a tanker track on the route in question!
There doesn't need to be a tanker track for a tanker to be flying with fighters in formation.

Often they have what are called ALTRVs, or "Altitude Reservations", which is authorization for the tanker and the fighters to fly cross country and conduct refuelling operations enroute.

This is, for example, how an east coast fighter unit gets its jets to Nellis for Red Flag without stopping enroute.

Happens all the time.
__________________
Trains were meant to be strafed.

0100011000101101001100010011010101000101
Hacker15e is offline  
Old March 16th, 2008, 02:34   #9
Doug Taylor
Agent Smith
 
Doug Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: KSDL
Posts: 39,830
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Doug Taylor Send a message via Skype™ to Doug Taylor
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Non-sequitur question!

Are all of the tankers called "Upset" or is that just a particular unit?
__________________
Doug Taylor
http://76school.flyblog.com (old!)
http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28)
Doug Taylor is offline  
Old March 16th, 2008, 02:44   #10
ASpilot2be
Old Skool
 
ASpilot2be's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Paradise:)
Posts: 4,428
Send a message via AIM to ASpilot2be Send a message via MSN to ASpilot2be Send a message via Skype™ to ASpilot2be
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Aerial refuelings are cool to watch. I love spring and summer and being able to watch them fly over.
__________________


ASpilot2be is online now  
Old March 16th, 2008, 04:24   #11
Hacker15e
Senior Member
 
Hacker15e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 830
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Taylor View Post
Are all of the tankers called "Upset" or is that just a particular unit?
I'm not 100% on the process as I'm not a tanker guy...

But when dragging fighters around cross-country, the movements are controlled by a specific USAF agency that arranges and coordinates them all.

They own a specific batch of callsigns that get re-used on those movements.

Other than that, specific units have their own assigned callsigns that they use for training sorties. The KC-135s that I used to tank with out of Seymour Johnson AFB were always the "Backy" callsign, and the 135s I tank with over here in England always use the "Quid" callsign.

I don't recognize the "Upset" callsign, so I have to guess that's a unit-owned callsign.
__________________
Trains were meant to be strafed.

0100011000101101001100010011010101000101
Hacker15e is offline  
Old March 16th, 2008, 09:10   #12
SteveC
Moderator
 
SteveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: GRR
Posts: 8,366
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

We often have "Upset" call sign KC135's doing approach and pattern work at GRR. Those come from Wisconsin I believe.
__________________
.

Life is painful.
Suffering is optional.
SteveC is offline  
Old March 16th, 2008, 10:06   #13
Rocketman99
Senior Member
 
Rocketman99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: LGA
Posts: 947
Send a message via AIM to Rocketman99 Send a message via MSN to Rocketman99
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Individual squadrons have their own callsigns for use on local sorties. My squadron in Okinawa used the callsign "Tora" if it was a local mission and a unit in Kansas uses "Turbo" for example.

On missions called coronets, which is the movement of a plane or group of planes from one side of the country or side of the world to another using tankers there are different callsigns, that tend to be standard. For instance, we often used Wooden when we were moving folks from the sandbox back to Japan or from Japan up to Alaska. Those callsigns weren't specific to a squadron, it was whoever was making that sortie.

Last but not least, the callsign "Reach," it is a generic Air Mobility Command callsign. It tends to be a stateside plane going overseas and it could be any matter of AMC plane such as a KC-135, KC-10, or C-5.

There ya go, far too much information on AF tanker callsigns.
__________________
NKAWTG...N!

Dammit, I gotta do black recurrent AGAIN! - Dough on AIM
Rocketman99 is offline  
Old March 16th, 2008, 10:19   #14
SteveC
Moderator
 
SteveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: GRR
Posts: 8,366
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

Doug;



<snicker>

UPSET KC-135 128TH ARG, MILWAUKEE, WI

http://pages.sbcglobal.net/wxtech/mo...y/callsign.txt
__________________
.

Life is painful.
Suffering is optional.
SteveC is offline  
Old March 16th, 2008, 11:16   #15
JacksonHandy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Home of the Airborne
Posts: 56
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

My experience, solely as a passenger in a sandy locale was that

Reach = C-17 or larger mission

Chrome = C-130 mission

Boxcar = Shorts 330? USARNG, those were hilarious

plus numerous other call signs for things I'd rather not post here.

Thanks to Reach 60? I think for the ride home last november.... best plane ride I've ever been on.
__________________
"I was commissioned to lead, not to read"

21A5P5W
JacksonHandy is offline  
Old March 16th, 2008, 11:46   #16
LoadMasterC141
Old Skool
 
LoadMasterC141's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Live in Temple, TX - From Ithaca, NY - Wish I was on an island in Fiji
Posts: 1,905
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

130's can also have the Reach call sign. Rocket was right in that it has to do with the aircraft going out of the country for the most part. Being that 130's do not do alot of pond-hopping line haul missions, it is fairly uncommon.

Reach is also not the only call sign you may hear an international AMC flight called as well. It is typically reserved for scheduled line ops. There are other call signs for presidential support, state department, and NASA/UN funded missions to name a few.
__________________
CFI, CFII, MEI, AMEL, ASEL, IFR, IGI
450TT 90ME
Ex- USAF C141B Crewmember
Ex- Cube Monkey
Getting paid to fly! (little stuff)
LoadMasterC141 is offline  
Old March 16th, 2008, 13:27   #17
GalaxyIFE
Senior Member
 
GalaxyIFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio TX or anywhere Uncle Sugar wants me....
Posts: 781
Default Re: Escort over TUS today approx 10:30

It's also VERY common to have aerial refuelings done over "random routes" which can be just about anywhere. Usually because of track time issues or weather on the track. The "Reach" callsign is used by any Air Mobility Command (AF) channel mission...can be military or civilian carriers. As loady said there are several other callsigns depending on mission.
__________________
"Capitalism without bankruptcy is like Christianity without hell." -Frank Borman, Former CEO Eastern Airlines
GalaxyIFE is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:22.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 jetcareers.com