![]() |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: MD
Posts: 395
|
What about the P210? You're not asking too much of that engine for the pressurization and other systems, are you? After all, as a percentage, more of the horsepower is going towards the traditional role of powering the airplane through the air, right? "How much was that new T182, again. Why?" http://www.aso.com/i.aso/AircraftVie...craft_id=74927 |
| |
| | #2 |
| Moderator Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Socal
Posts: 5,692
|
I would go for a Piper Malibu -
|
| |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NEWARK
Posts: 1,129
|
Tough question to answer...It's like asking which is the best twin engine jet? An MD-80 is a fine twin engine jet to haul people/stuff around, but an A-10 is a better twin to blow up tanks and armored vehicles. The 172 has proven itself to be one of the best all-around single engine aircraft around. |
| |
| | #4 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,205
|
I like the Piper Malibu Mirage. Hopefully I will start flying one soon and getting paid.
|
| |
| | #5 |
| Old Skool |
Navion. ![]() [/sarcasm ff]
|
| |
| | #7 |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2003 Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 3,094
|
For what?
|
| |
| | #8 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
|
I'm partial to the Bonanza (especially the later model V35B's), but I'm biased. |
| |
| | #9 |
| Agent Smith |
Actually, if you're not trying to blow stuff up, the A-36 Bonanza and the F-33A have to be the Mercedes of all single-engine pistons. Beech builds a very nice aircraft however very expensive as well.
|
| |
| | #10 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Knoxville, Maryland
Posts: 244
|
Bonanza, hands down. Need more speed, get the turbo model. Beech has a GREAT product!
|
| |
| | #11 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: MO
Posts: 237
|
Having flown a 210, an A36, and a Malibu Mirage, I'd have to say the Malibu is hands down the best piston single out there. It's got a decent ramp presence, fairly comfortable for passengers in the back, and good performance. You can't beat 215 KTAS at FL250 in a piston single.
|
| |
| | #12 |
| Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: chicago
Posts: 4,311
|
Wait... I though you didn't care about speed ![]() You know what's funny... pilots love to fly, but once in the air they do all they can to get to their destination as quickly as possible. |
| |
| | #13 |
| Administrator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Pinal Airpark
Posts: 6,897
|
[ QUOTE ] Wait... I though you didn't care about speed ![]() You know what's funny... pilots love to fly, but once in the air they do all they can to get to their destination as quickly as possible. [/ QUOTE ] How about the Beech B36? |
| |
| | #14 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Knoxville, Maryland
Posts: 244
|
Nah, i really think its just a fascination with going FAST! " I feel the need...........the need............for speed!"
|
| |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 385
|
Have to say the Bonanza as well. Just the other day I was doing a cross country in a seminole (not a speed demon, but it is a twin!!) Cruising at 7000- GS about 170 kt's and a Bonanza blew past us as if we were standing still........ |
| |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 671
|
How about the Lancair IV-P? It cruises at 330 mph @ FL240 . Maybe if someday I have the time and money to build one....Lancair IV-P |
| |
| | #18 |
| Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: chicago
Posts: 4,311
| HAHAHAH funniest thing in the world!!!! |
| |
| | #19 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 554
|
P-51
|
| |
| | #20 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: OH
Posts: 161
|
Any Mooney fans out there?! It may not be the fastest, but I love the Ovation 2 and the Bravo! Can't decide which one I like more...
|
| |
| | #21 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 671
|
[ QUOTE ] HAHAHAH funniest thing in the world!!!! [/ QUOTE ] I must admit, its not mine. I've seen it on various forums, so who knows which person had it first. |
| |
| | #22 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NYC
Posts: 186
|
A P-3 Orion. I mean P-51 mustang |
| |
| | #23 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Colorado
Posts: 175
|
C-172. Yeah yeah I know some of you are probably thinking its just a "plain vanilla" airplane but I couldn't even imagine what general aviation would be like without it.
|
| |
| | #24 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: MD
Posts: 395
|
I realize that that was rather a vague question. Let me narrow it down some: What is the best single-engine, piston aircraft for personal use? Think of things like: best balance between payload/range/speed/systems/operating cost. This came to me because I noticed how relatively inexpensive the acquisition costs are for a malibu. Many are cheaper than a new 182. I then posted this on another board, and I got a lot of responses that said, essentially, the Malibu is a nice idea, but it CO$T$ LOT$ OF MONEY to operate, there are too many delicate systems, asking all of those systems to be run by a single 300 or 350 h.p. piston engine was too much, etc. Most recommended that when I build enough experience, I would find something like a Seneca to be the better card to play. The operating costs were somehow less, the speed was respectable, the useful load was good, the systems weren't overly complicated for a civillian pilot, etc. Now, after reading this, do you have any new or modified thoughts? Is that P210 looking better? |
| |
| | #25 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 29
|
Hmm, I'm not sure if you'd consider this personal use, but just thought I'd weigh in with some dreamboats. Even the modern, more practical one is not quite in everyone's reach. 1. The SF260 MARCHETTI, the Ferrari of the skies in more ways than one. 2. The F4U Corsair. Perfect antidote to Kamikazes, just use that divine wind to show them what some pirates can do, Arrr. sorry, I'll stop now |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |