![]() |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Western Chi-Town Burb's
Posts: 615
|
I know that there is a company in the south east who has developed quite a niche in the air taxi business using Cirrus aircraft. I recently learned of a club/charter/management business near me that is in the process of begining an air taxi business with the Cirrus also. The question I present is: once135 minimums have been obtained, would this be more bennificial (SP) than flying freight? I would assume that most of our goals in this field lead to a mult-engine career. That being said, would this type of single engine operation be of value to someone other than as a TT builder? Wouldn't we be more inclined to take a multi gig of the same sort? I guess I just don't see the benifit of this, other than the TT. Personally, I think a freight gig with a multi would be better in the long run, for the multi PIC, no? |
| |
| | #2 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 2,728
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Western Chi-Town Burb's
Posts: 615
| |
| |
| | #4 |
| Old Skool |
Actually, the company you are talking about is, from my understanding, hiring higher time people. It seems they have a decent schedule, basically doing shift work, I think, or 5 days a week and that's it, type of thing. It wouldn't be pager time, from what I understand. As far as single engine, yes, it's worthless, for the most part, if you have no multi, and have career aspirations of the airlines, etc. If you want to have a good schedule, decent pay for the flying, it would be good. For those with airlines in the sights, no it would not be better than 135 ME freight. There are a lot of people that have a ton of TT, and no multi time, and it hurts them down the road. |
| |
| | #5 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Winchestertonfieldville
Posts: 6,742
|
If your talking about Point2Point, they went out of business recently.
__________________ The simplest answer tends to be correct. |
| |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 619
|
Point2point was based in N.D. Since he mentioned the S.E. I assumed SATSair.
|
| |
| | #7 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: This One
Posts: 289
|
SaTSAir sounds right. Think they are a M-F operation with two shifts. One 6a.m. to 2 p.m. and the other 2 p.m. to 10 p.m. If your interested in flying any turbine type equipment, the single stuff doesn't do you any good. If you have the 135 mins - find a multi job. As far as the people that work there - I've heard it's usually older folks - or folks that like a "normal" type of work schedule and are not overly interested in flying bigger stuff and all the hassles that goes with it. Max |
| |
| | #8 |
| Old Skool |
Freight would be a better route to go.
|
| |
| | #9 |
| Old Skool | |
| |
| | #10 |
| Newbie Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
|
Here's the skinny on SATSair. I've been working here about 10 months and it is a great company. It's not Monday-Friday. It's not, "shifts." It's not, "pager 24-7." We work 4 days on, 3 days off. Sometimes you're on the road for the four days straight, but usually home at least one or two nights. Pay averages out to 30K first year plus per diem, 36K second year and tops out at 45k currently. The company has the option to work pilots 5 days a week during their first two years if it gets real busy, but if so, fifth day is paid as overtime. I worked 5/2 my first 4 months when we were short on planes and pilots, but haven't since, except for one week I volunteered to get a few extra bucks. Lines are bid based on seniority and you know your schedule for the whole month ahead of time. Stay in nice hotels, treated very well by management and scheduling, mx top notch, wx decisions respected. Hired to the town you live in/want to work in. Business is growing steadily and pax are thrilled with the service and telling their friends. I think the experience you gain in this is about equivalent to single pilot freight in a Baron or Seneca. Different in some areas, but about equal overall. But for the most part this is not an entry level, or "stepping stone" job. Many of the pilots here are retired military/airline and average flight time is somewhere in the 4-5000 hour range. (I have a little less than 4000 TT so I'm a veritable, "green horn.") Pretty much everyone has prior experience in either airline, military, corporate or other 135 experience or some combination. I would say flying the SR-22; a glass cockpit, EFIS airplane into all kinds of airports day and night in IFR conds single pilot with passengers sitting next to you and watching everything you do, dealing with the passengers directly, doing all your own flight planning with flexibility for inevitable changes and rearranges, is certainly valuable experience. The customer service aspect is huge in this environment and would certainly help prepare for a corporate position. On the other hand, insurance requirements can trump everything sometimes and x number of ME time is required for certain jobs. Almost all of us at SATS have ME time already and aren't here to "build hours." So ME freight is probably better for younger, upwardly mobile types and this is more of a retirement--easy on the family--good QOL--home-town type of job. Last edited by skydweller97; June 16th, 2007 at 19:44. |
| |
| | #11 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5
|
I am looking for a flying job and have approx. 4000 hrs. Sats air sounded like a good idea until I talked to a Satsair Pilot while hanging around PDK. He said that there are many longish duty days (12+) , and much hanging around . Are they financially stable? What does the future look like to you at Satsair? thanks
|
| |
| | #12 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 80
|
Skydweller, What kind of SR22 are you using? The G1 or G2? Any GTS? Are they all fully loaded w/ XM, Cmax, etc??? Is SatsAir going to get any G3 or Turbos? Just curious. Thanks |
| |
| | #13 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
| Quote:
SATSair is experiencing strong growth and supposedly some big investors have been looking at the company and talking about coming on board. The passengers are thrilled and multiplying like rabbits as they tell their friends about the service. | |
| |
| | #14 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
| Quote:
Negative on the Turbos but I think we are trying to get the remaining 40 of our current 50 plane order converted to G3s for the extra payload. G2 with TKS and A/C suffers on the useful load. I don't know why they put bigger tanks in the G3. The current 81 Gals is 5 hours in the air if you lean to economy. We almost never carry full fuel - usually tabs or tabs + 10 per side. | |
| |
| | #15 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 80
|
Skydweller, Thanks for the info. Do you get to "keep" your aircraft at your home airport? Would you get to trade up your G2 for a G3? Do you usually fly LOP (Economy) or ROP for go fast mode? I own a 2004 SR20 w/ PFD and enjoy it a lot. I just fly for fun though. I hear nothing but good things about SATSair. Glad to hear it's doing well! |
| |
| | #16 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
| Quote:
Right now, pilot's discretion on leaning. Company recommendation is 65% and LOP with a tailwind and 75% and ROP going into headwind. I always run LOP 25-35 degrees in econ mode. You only lose about 3-5 kts and save about 4-5 gals per hour. The NMPG is better even when going into a headwind so the rational doesn't hold for these piston planes and at the altitudes we fly. | |
| |
| | #17 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 80
|
Skydweller, Sounds like they have a good system on aircraft rotation. I ALWAYS fly LOP also. You just can't beat the fuel savings for the small amount of speed loss. I normally get around 9.2gph at 143 TAS (if the plane is clean ). I was flying down to FL back in January and with a great tailwind was getting 23nmpg. It was GREAT! hahaha
|
| |
| | #18 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 80
|
Skydweller, Just curious where are you based? I fly out of SHD in Virginia but use LYH Virginia Aviation for all my MX. |
| |
| | #19 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 22
|
ZMAN. I work at that place and it must be a different company I work for than skydweller. Usually on a four day on sched. I leave early the first day and get back late the last day. Long days and low pay.More pilots are leaving than they are hiring. Single engine piston does no good for someone looking for a career in aviation. I don't think the company will be around that long. 68navajo
|
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |