jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > General > General Topics

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 9th, 2007, 14:07   #26
jtrain609
Old Skool
 
jtrain609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 12,336
Send a message via ICQ to jtrain609 Send a message via AIM to jtrain609
Default Re: Hold in Position - Delay for Wake Turbulence

Quote:
Originally Posted by seagull View Post
Have you?
Haven't gone all the way over, but I've gotten my butt kicked (60-80 degree banks) when I got vectored too close behind a 737 a handful of times. I haven't had a problem on departure yet since I'll usually out climb the heavy jets out of Burbank on most departures until I can make my turn (400')
__________________


jtrain609 is offline  
Old June 9th, 2007, 15:07   #27
jtrain609
Old Skool
 
jtrain609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 12,336
Send a message via ICQ to jtrain609 Send a message via AIM to jtrain609
Default Re: Hold in Position - Delay for Wake Turbulence

BTW The real point I was trying to make is that if you don't wait the perscribed time, and you don't follow SOP and you don't do everything to cover your butt then you could well end up in front of the chief pilots desk trying to explain why you did what you did. You bend metal while following the book and people are going to shrug and say "Eh, #### happens." You bend metal while skirting the rules and the guys up top are going to be forced to cover THEIR butts and say, "Well you shoulda followed SOP" and bad things might well follow. At least that's how it works around these parts.

SOP is there to protect us from ourselves. Not to help ATC, not to help the company and not to help the freight in the back. It's to protect US from making dumb decisions, so why not follow it? And if it causes undue delay or it's unnecessary then change the SOP and be done with it.
__________________


jtrain609 is offline  
Old June 9th, 2007, 17:48   #28
Cav
Senior Member
 
Cav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Let me look, I forgot.
Posts: 668
Default Re: Hold in Position - Delay for Wake Turbulence

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtsu_av8er View Post
A schedule, and somebody paying big money for you to be on time!
Sounds like a cost of doing business to me. I'm pretty sure that the mgmt at XJT would back me up.
__________________
"Rigid integrity is the first and most gainful qualification in every profession." Thomas Jefferson
Cav is offline  
Old June 9th, 2007, 17:52   #29
Cav
Senior Member
 
Cav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Let me look, I forgot.
Posts: 668
Default Re: Hold in Position - Delay for Wake Turbulence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick View Post
And 30 planes in line for takeoff!


I saw a 737 taxi onto 22R at EWR starting backwards to use every last inch of it, then line up the right way, and when tower said cleared for takeoff he came on and said "Nope, we need 20 more seconds for separation." Tower said okay sir takeoff clearance cancelled, you just let me know when you're ready to go. I suspect the tower knows what they're doing as far as timing wake separation but maybe not. It's only their job.
Just an FYI but the last time I had recurrent CRM in EWR and the tower controller came and talked to us he stated the EWR separates departure traffic off of radar distances not time for wake turbulence. He also said that if you require more time ask and you'll get it but like you said he asked us to do it in a timely manner prior to a position and hold. I've never had any trouble out of EWR.
__________________
"Rigid integrity is the first and most gainful qualification in every profession." Thomas Jefferson
Cav is offline  
Old June 9th, 2007, 18:54   #30
Stone Cold
Old Skool
 
Stone Cold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SE US & Kiev
Posts: 3,038
Send a message via AIM to Stone Cold
Default Re: Hold in Position - Delay for Wake Turbulence

It all boils down to PIC's decision...out of our hub airport at Airnet, we'd (prop pilots) always received wake turbulence holds for our Lears. Once a pilot was online for more than a day, it was always a wave the hold, please.

On the other hand, one of Airnet's fatalities (a while ago) was a Baron (I believe), trying to make the early turnoff at CMH behind a 75, and he ended up planted in the ground and on fire. He later died because of trying to get too close to a 75 and getting in the wake.

Just remember, it's your behind that will pay the ultimate price for doing something that possibly shouldn't be done. It's also your behind, if you choose to stay behind a Lear (or insert other types of airplanes) for more time than you think is required. That's why it's called Pilot In Command.
Stone Cold is offline  
Old June 9th, 2007, 20:07   #31
seagull
Old Skool
 
seagull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,045
Default Re: Hold in Position - Delay for Wake Turbulence

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtrain609 View Post
Haven't gone all the way over, but I've gotten my butt kicked (60-80 degree banks) when I got vectored too close behind a 737 a handful of times. I haven't had a problem on departure yet since I'll usually out climb the heavy jets out of Burbank on most departures until I can make my turn (400')
Well, surprised that's happened to you. I flew light aircraft out of LAX, ONT, SNA, BUR and others for years and never got rolled that far. I have felt it start to nibble, but always yanked back and got out of the vortex before my bank exceeded 30 degrees.

As far as following procedures for CYA, obviously can't argue with that!
seagull is offline  
Old June 9th, 2007, 20:27   #32
Cav
Senior Member
 
Cav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Let me look, I forgot.
Posts: 668
Default Re: Hold in Position - Delay for Wake Turbulence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone Cold View Post
It all boils down to PIC's decision...out of our hub airport at Airnet, we'd (prop pilots) always received wake turbulence holds for our Lears. Once a pilot was online for more than a day, it was always a wave the hold, please.

On the other hand, one of Airnet's fatalities (a while ago) was a Baron (I believe), trying to make the early turnoff at CMH behind a 75, and he ended up planted in the ground and on fire. He later died because of trying to get too close to a 75 and getting in the wake.

Just remember, it's your behind that will pay the ultimate price for doing something that possibly shouldn't be done. It's also your behind, if you choose to stay behind a Lear (or insert other types of airplanes) for more time than you think is required. That's why it's called Pilot In Command.
Well put.
__________________
"Rigid integrity is the first and most gainful qualification in every profession." Thomas Jefferson
Cav is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2008 jetcareers.com