|
August 12th, 2003, 13:05
| #26 |
| Moderator  Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Socal
Posts: 5,691
|  Re: My Opinion on Light Jets
[ QUOTE ] You guys could quote him correctly. He said, [ QUOTE ] You musta misunderstood me. I couldn't fly that citation without another pilot even if it was legal. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] It was edited at a later date! |
|
|
August 12th, 2003, 14:09
| #27 |
| Moderator  Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: chicago
Posts: 4,311
| Re: My Opinion on Light Jets
Guys comon.... this thread is supposed to be about light jets; not whether or not this kid can fly one.
|
|
|
|
August 12th, 2003, 16:05
| #28 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Florida
Posts: 1,275
| Re: My Opinion on Light Jets
[ QUOTE ] Say you loose and engine one day when your auto pilots busted and the weather is a minimums. The pilot has a hell of a lot to do in a short time. Got to get out the plate and fly it at the same time. I have a hard enough time flying on one engine in VMC. [/ QUOTE ] Not to be nitpicky, but lets assume this did happen, A citation ISP is only certified single pilot with a functional autopilot, with one inop then technically a SIC is required and unfortunately little fella, you are not SIC qualified.... |
|
|
|
August 12th, 2003, 17:47
| #29 |
| Senior Member  | Re: My Opinion on Light Jets
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You musta misunderstood me. I could fly that citation without another pilot even if it was legal. [/ QUOTE ] Really? Whatta ya say you run through the memory items and limitations for us. Just be sure to explain your answers as well then, Just so you don't google it and then cut and paste. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry about that I messed up when I wrote it. I ment to right couldn't but I was in a rush and forgot to put the n't sorry. |
|
|
|
August 12th, 2003, 19:35
| #31 |
| Banned Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,272
| Re: My Opinion on Light Jets
[ QUOTE ] Not to be nitpicky, but lets assume this did happen, A citation ISP is only certified single pilot with a functional autopilot, with one inop then technically a SIC is required and unfortunately little fella, you are not SIC qualified.... [/ QUOTE ] Under part 91 there is no restriction that I know of. 135, oh yeah you need the AP. |
|
|
|
August 12th, 2003, 19:42
| #33 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Florida
Posts: 1,275
| Re: My Opinion on Light Jets
Actually it is my understanding that even under part 91 a single pilot aircraft such as the CE501 requires a second crew member if the autopilot is not functioning. I had inquired with FlightSafety and AOPA when I was trying to log SIC time part 91 in a CE501 and this is pretty much what they told, but we could all be wrong...
|
|
|
|
August 12th, 2003, 19:46
| #34 |
| Senior Member | Re: My Opinion on Light Jets
Oh, makes sence tho. I wouldn't want to hand fly'er at 35,000 any. I log all my time as Dual of course since I don't have a ppl. My moms an CFIIME tho so it still counts; right?
|
|
|
|
August 12th, 2003, 19:47
| #35 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
| Re: My Opinion on Light Jets
Guess so, if she signs it.
|
|
|
|
August 12th, 2003, 19:51
| #36 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Florida
Posts: 1,275
| Re: My Opinion on Light Jets
You can log dual as long as your mom was type rated and is recurrent under 61.58, I know FlightSafety does it this way, but I am not sure if Simulflite or Simcom do it the same way.
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
