![]() |
| | #1 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: ROC
Posts: 2,225
|
In my Comm groundschool one of our head CFI's told us that centrifical force does not exist and that is is centrifugal force. I thought he was nuts for coming up with that crap but google may be proving him right. What do ya'll think?
__________________ |
| |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul
Posts: 1,966
|
Perhaps you should find a dictionary, look up "centrifical", and let us know what you find. Webster's defines "centrifugal" as "directed or moving away from a center or axis" or "operated by centrifugal force." Oddly, "centrifical" does not have an entry.
__________________ I'm free of all prejudices. I hate everyone equally. Comm. - ASEL, Instrument 290 TT |
| |
| | #3 |
| Old Skool |
Do you mean centrifugal vs. centripetal forces?
|
| |
| | #4 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: ROC
Posts: 2,225
|
__________________ |
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: LCK
Posts: 448
|
technically speaking, it doesnt truely exist, reference this thread http://forums.jetcareers.com/technical-talk/32512-overbanking-v-adverse-yaw.html |
| |
| | #6 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: ROC
Posts: 2,225
| Sorry, never heard of centrifugal
__________________ |
| |
| | #7 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 1,000
| Quote:
More important is the discussion about centrifugal vs centripetal force -- one that was debunked in high school physics class.
__________________ Trains were meant to be strafed. 0100011000101101001100010011010101000101 | |
| |
| | #8 |
| Old Skool |
"centrifugal force" does not exist end discussion
__________________ CPL AMEL-I 206 TT / 25 ME ...and a *YOB. 1st Place - Sportsman - Doug Yost Aerobatic Contest 2nd Place - Sportsman - Illinois State Open Best 1st Time Sportsman - Midwest Aerobatic Challenge |
| |
| | #9 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: ROC
Posts: 2,225
| lol. I must be a retard, I know what a centrifuge is but i remember the bucket full of water from middle school science and calling it centrifical force (unless i cant spell) but I had NEVER heard of centrifugal.
__________________ |
| |
| | #10 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,885
|
Centripetal force is really the force present in allowing the airplane to fly along a curved path, i.e, make a turn. Centrifugal force exists...and is counter to centripetal...but doesn't act on the airplane...otherwise they would cancel each other out and negate the turn. It's my understanding that the force you feel as you turn in a car is not centrifugal force...but the centripetal force pushing you to the inside of the turn. Otherwise...you would remain on a line tangent to the turn and continue in a straight line. Seagull...??? Is this accurate? |
| |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: LCK
Posts: 448
|
ok, theres centripetal and centrifugal but no such thing as centrifical. The last two sound similar though so i can where you might have got that.
|
| |
| | #12 |
| Old Skool | Helped you out there... As far as your question, I guess we've come to the conclusion I was going to tell you. Neither one exists. Centrifugal forces, in the physics courses I've taken (long long time ago) does not exist (at least in most circumstances, and for aerodynamics discussion). Centrifical is just a misspelling, I am assuming. Centripetal force is what turns an airplane. http://observe.arc.nasa.gov/nasa/spa...trifugal1.html Last edited by Stone Cold; October 25th, 2006 at 19:05. Reason: added content |
| |
| | #13 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakenpain
Posts: 1,000
| Quote:
Just like people who manage to pronounce an "r" when saying "wash" (e.g. "warsh").
__________________ Trains were meant to be strafed. 0100011000101101001100010011010101000101 | |
| |
| | #14 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 215
| Quote:
True forces are present in all reference frames. So in the inertial ground frame, there is a centripetal force and the plane moves in a circle. Within the accelerated reference frame of the plane, the centripetal force acting on the pilot exactly counteracts apparent centrifugal force, because the pilot is not accelerating relative to the plane (assuming you're just sitting in your seat). It only makes sense to talk about these apparent pseudoforces when you are referring to the accelerated frame. So, the apparent centrifugal force DOES act on the aircraft and DOES negate the turn, but only WITHIN the accelerated reference frame - the plane does not turn relative to itself. If the plane turns 15 degrees to the left, so does the plane's reference frame, and within that frame, nothing has changed. Last edited by Realms09; October 25th, 2006 at 22:52. Reason: Additional thoughts | |
| |
| | #15 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,045
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #16 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
To put that clearer, imagine a car turning in a circle. The car is experiencing a force towards the center of the circle, otherwise it would continue in a straight path. This force is centripetal-- a force towards the center of the circle. Now if you are INSIDE the car, you seem to feel as though you are pushed OUT from the center of the circle, but what is really happening is that the rest of the car is being pused toward the center of the circle, and you are not. It feels as though you are experiencing a force to the outside, because your whole reference frame (in this case the car) is experiencing an opposite force (to the inside). You aren't really experiencing a "real" force, what you notice is only an "apparent" force. This is what centrifugal force is. It's not really a force at all, but rather an "apparent force" that objects experience when they are in a frame of reference, where the whole frame of reference is accelerating or experiencing a force.
__________________ Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation? | |
| |
| | #17 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,648
| Quote:
Besides gravity, 2 forces act on the water and the bucket. The first we know from an introductory study of Newton. A body at rest tends to remain at rest, and a body in motion tends to remain in motion, until acted upon by some outside force. We usually refer to this tendancy as inertia. The bucket of water wants to continue to move in the direction in which it is currently moving. If you could freeze-frame the motion, the direction it wants to travel is exactly perpendicular to your outstretched arm. So then, why does it not travel in this direction? Because your outstretched arm also imparts a force to the bucket in the direction of the center of this spinning man and bucket combo. Your arm pulls the bucket toward your body. It is this force that transforms the straight line, unaccelerated motion of the bucket, into a circular motion. This force is known as centripetal force. Wanna know what happens without centripetal force? Let go of the bucket. Then it's all inertia and gravity. ![]() . | |
| |
| | #18 | |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: GRR
Posts: 8,628
| Quote:
__________________ . If life gives you lemons, throw 'em into a quart of vodka. ~Red Green | |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |