![]() |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Houston
Posts: 62
| Does anyone know when the 2007 FAR/AIM will become effective, or is it already? I have a CFI ride next month and just want to make sure I have the current edition, one less thing to the examiner to pick on. I am also pretty sure that the new CFI PTS is coming up nov 1st. |
| |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul
Posts: 1,895
| It's out.
__________________ I'm free of all prejudices. I hate everyone equally. Commercial Pilot - ASEL, Instrument 290 TT |
| |
| | #3 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 7,303
| Doesn't it not become effective until January 1, 2007 @ 12am?
__________________ Dash 8 FO "Time spent flying is not deducted from one's lifespan." ![]() |
| |
| | #4 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Houston
Posts: 62
| Not sure, thats what I was wondering |
| |
| | #5 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul
Posts: 1,895
| The FAR are effective now (or were as of 8-3-2006). AIM is current through March 14, 2007.
__________________ I'm free of all prejudices. I hate everyone equally. Commercial Pilot - ASEL, Instrument 290 TT |
| |
| | #6 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Coloradan in Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,234
| Yeah there is a date in the first couple of pages there that says when it becomes effective. When I was in CFI school it was during Dec of 2003. The instructor said my 2003 far/aim was outdated and that I should be using the 2004. He then showed me where it says it expires. Just because it says the year across the top cover doesn't mean that is when it is good for. |
| |
| | #7 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul
Posts: 1,895
| I'm not seeing any effective date on the ASA FAR/AIM. The inside cover page just says "This publication contains current regulations as of August 3, 2006. The Aeronautical Information Manual is current through March 14, 2007." I've got a ride coming up, so if the 2007 FAR/AIM is legit yet, that would be good to know.
__________________ I'm free of all prejudices. I hate everyone equally. Commercial Pilot - ASEL, Instrument 290 TT |
| |
| | #8 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
![]() | |
| |
| | #9 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Coloradan in Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,234
| Quote:
Good luck on your ride... Dominate that thing! | |
| |
| | #10 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2003 Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,931
| Quote:
The original government sources are never out of date. The privately-published collection might be. Don't worry about whether the book is out =before= the FAR or the AIM become effective. Won't happen. On the other hand, parts of the book might be obsolete before it's even available for purchase (more likely with the FAR which changes when the FAA makes or modifies regs than with the AIM, which is actually on a twice-a-year publication schedule) | |
| |
| | #11 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
| I just took an ATP/type oral and brought a 2006 FAR/AIM. Neither the check airman or the POI that was observing it said a word about it. It's still 2006 as far as I'm concerned. Good luck! |
| |
| | #12 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Coloradan in Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,234
| Quote:
I think that is the thing though, when you look at the actual regs put out by the FAA, they aren't listed as "the 2006 regs" they are just "the regs". It is when ASA, and Jeppesen gets ahold of them and publishes them in their book that they slap that year on the cover. | |
| |
| | #13 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,074
| If your ride is with a DPE, I wouldn't even worry about it. They proably will be fine with either. If it is with the FSDO, they may be a bit more anal. The 2007 edition is the one that is current now.
__________________ "Roads?...Where we're going we don't need roads." |
| |
| | #14 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2003 Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,931
| Quote:
BTW, most of the publishers will provide periodic updates online to take interim changes into account. | |
| |
| | #15 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,074
| Which you should consider downloading before going to a ride with the FSDO.
__________________ "Roads?...Where we're going we don't need roads." |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |