![]() |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 31
|
I was wondering... I have a friend who has his private certificate and I only have 10 Hrs. and a student liscense. If I go up right seat with him and practice manuvers (sp.?) and emergency procedures with him can I log any time for it? SIC (Second In Command) anything? PK KD7WNJ |
| |
| | #2 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member |
no
|
| |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 651
|
SIC is more of a thing you will do in aircraft that are certified for two pilots. Such as when you are a first officer for an airline or cargo outfit. Like the others said, you can't log that time. Not that a little extra stick time would hurt you though. As a student pilot you will need to be with an instructor or endorsed by one to fly solo in order to log the time. Just off the top of my head I don't think you can even log safety pilot time unless you are at least a private pilot. |
| |
| | #5 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 31
|
Thats what I figured; However as Lee D said the extra practice wouldn't hurt. As for solo I only need one more "supervised" solo and I will have full non-crosswind privilages. |
| |
| | #6 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Winchestertonfieldville
Posts: 6,802
|
Be careful. 10 hours isnt enough to deal with moderate crosswinds.
__________________ The simplest answer tends to be correct. |
| |
| | #7 |
| Old Skool | Wouldn't that depend on the student and his/her abilities? Suppose they're a super stud?
|
| |
| | #8 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 31
|
If I could land in 11 Kt. tailwinds doesn't that mean anything? |
| |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: South Dakota
Posts: 509
| |
| |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 651
|
Landing with a tail wind isnt really a difficult thing, heck, you can "land" in a 20 knot tail wind if you feel so inclined . . . . . if there is any runway left under your wheels when you finally come to a complete stop is another thing entirely.
|
| |
| | #11 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 31
|
Actually no!!! At KAPV we have RYS 18/36 and 8/26. Last Saturday when I went up the wind was from 080 at 10 so any RWY would probably be okay. Then it switched to 360@11 and we were landing on the calm wind RWY 18! No one got the point to switch. So yeah its true I was landing in 11 KT. tailwinds. Not to mention the wind sheat and thermals around the pattern and especially on final. Boy you sure learn the point of a stabilized approach with a tailwind. I finally got the hang of it after about the fifth touch-and-go. Fortunantly RWY 18 is 6200 Ft. long so I had plenty of landing room with the overshooting and all from the wind. |
| |
| | #12 |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2003 Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 3,094
| ... ortraining where crosswinds are the rule. (The AOPA Pilot article a few years ago on Maui as having the most crosswindy airport comes to mind). If you are almost always landing in a significant crosswind from day 1, it's probably no big deal.
|
| |
| | #13 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 31
|
Up here at APV the wind never stops and is almost always off the RWY heading.
|
| |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: South Dakota
Posts: 509
|
sorry, should've elaborated. 11 knot tailwind ain't nothin'... just don't think that'll necessarily help you with a hefty crosswind. maybe you can land with a strong crosswind, but I'd really think twice about going up solo if it's bad.
|
| |
| | #15 |
| Old Skool |
BGR's runway was 11441'x300', talk about a sheet of pavement. Its now x200' but it is still paved 300' wide. Earlier today I went to a practice field that was 2400'x50' with a 300' displaced threshold for trees on the approach end. Talk about night and day. I would agree that if the runway is long enough, and taiwind is not a big deal for a newer pilot. Crosswinds take a bit more time to get the kinks out of that skill.
__________________ As a wise man said, sumb!tch flew in, sumb!tch'll fly out. Ski Hard. Party Harder. |
| |
| | #16 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Winchestertonfieldville
Posts: 6,802
| Quote:
__________________ The simplest answer tends to be correct. | |
| |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Northern Hemisphere
Posts: 1,370
| Actually during my PPL check ride, I ended up having to do my final soft-field landing with a tail wind. There was a lot of traffic at FDK (difficult to try a runway change) and so we decided that the runway was long enough and it was safe. I used up most of the runway in the 172. But I was taking that risk as a PIC after evaluating the situation so I wouldn't recommend it to anyone, especially student pilots.
|
| |
| | #18 |
| Old Skool |
From flying helicopters I am very adverse to landing in a tailwind. Whereas in an airplane you just might need lots of runway, in a helicopter you might need "out of ground effect" hover power, and if you don't have OGE hover power that day, you crash. |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |