Chautauqua Selected as a Continental Express Carrier

[Timbuff10]

Interesting, I guess it just happened to work out that most of the regionals in DEN operate the CRJ instead of the ERJ. Seems like the ERJ may even be the better option.

[Alchemy]

Yes, the XR is the only one with winglets: There are four 145 subfleets, the ER, EP, LR, and XR. The differences are weights, engine thrust ratings, fuel capacity, and a few other minor items. The ER is the oldest and worst performer, the XR the best.

[Maximillian_Jenius]

Originally Posted by Alchemy

Yes, the XR is the only one with winglets: There are four 145 subfleets, the ER, EP, LR, and XR. The differences are weights, engine thrust ratings, fuel capacity, and a few other minor items. The ER is the oldest and worst performer, the XR the best.

It was the LR that I was thinking about. I see the XJT XR here in PHX and those things look larger then a 50 seat CRJ.

[Alchemy]

The XR's are pretty much the same size as the other 3. The only visible differences are the winglets and the ventral fuel tank on the bottom of the fuselage (hold an extra 275 gallons of fuel).

IMO, 145 does usually look larger than the CRJ-200 because it's longer. The extra width of the ERJ is more noticeable to my eyes than the extra width of the CRJ.....hmmmm the age old debate over length vs. girth continues.

[Cheechako]

From a passenger perspective, I like the CRJ better. It seems quieter and a bit roomier. That being said, I've only ridden in the back of the ERJ DFW-SHV and probably never went above FL230 where any airplane exceeding 300 kts will be loud. The wind noise just seemed a bit excessive.

Also. . . for you ERJ drivers, it seemed a bit pitch sensitive. . . or was that pilot technique??

[Bog]

Originally Posted by txpilot

I just went over to the regional board over at that "other" site...man, all those guys/gals really are all over each other, aren't they? It's scary over there...glad y'all on here aren't like that.

That explains why the regionals will continue to get crappy payrates and why ALPA National could give a damn about us. Once the "Hey, that's my flying!" cries from 800 and 8000 hour pilots goes away, maybe we'll learn to work together and make some progress. How people get so possessive about their own contract work is beyond me.

[ERfly]

Originally Posted by SkyWChris

Also. . . for you ERJ drivers, it seemed a bit pitch sensitive. . . or was that pilot technique??

Probably just our wonderful autopilot. You have to be very careful and very smooth about pitch inputs to it. Otherwise, it'll do EXACTLY what you ask it to do. It's not a very smooth piece of equipment.

[Doug Taylor]

I really think if you buy a ticket on United, you should be flying on a UAL aircraft with UAL pilots.

The entry level position could be the CRJ (or whatever the smallest aircraft there is in the whole dumbasssed 'porfolio' concept)

If you treat and compensate your employees well, you're still going to attract the best pilots even if the entry level position is a 50 seat jet. Lower turnover, lower costs, a legion of employees that are all pulling on the same side of the rope.

But the whole idea of competing subcontractors beating their brains out to provide lift under an "Express/Connection/Whatever" banner is another facet of what's destroyed the piloting profession.

One airline, one carrier, one pilot group, one seniority list.

[GaTechKid]

IMO, the CRJ is a better looking jet. The ERJ, especially the 145, looks like it could snap in half at any time. Hell, even the slaab is a wee bit wider than an ERJ.

[Doug Taylor]

The only time you should use the phrase "good looking" is when talking about the DC-8 stretch.

[B767Driver]

Originally Posted by Doug Taylor

I really think if you buy a ticket on United, you should be flying on a UAL aircraft with UAL pilots.

The entry level position could be the CRJ (or whatever the smallest aircraft there is in the whole dumbasssed 'porfolio' concept)

If you treat and compensate your employees well, you're still going to attract the best pilots even if the entry level position is a 50 seat jet. Lower turnover, lower costs, a legion of employees that are all pulling on the same side of the rope.

But the whole idea of competing subcontractors beating their brains out to provide lift under an "Express/Connection/Whatever" banner is another facet of what's destroyed the piloting profession.

One airline, one carrier, one pilot group, one seniority list.

Strongly Agree.

A year or so ago there was a consumer advocacy group that was bringing a lawsuit forward against the airlines claiming false advertising.

I'm not sure what ever came of it....probably didn't have enough teeth to win against all of the fine print.

I'd have to say our profession won't be respectable again until all of the subcontractors stop underbidding everyone else.

I ate lunch with a 46 year old United 757 Captain today. Without me saying anything...he said, "These RJs have ruined our profession. I'm quitting to become a general contractor."

Wow. That's a pretty strong action to back up his statement. That's a 757 Captain!

[Timbuff10]

I have always wondered why it wasn't like that anyway.

Think of all the training costs that comes with replacing one airline with another and how often it is happening in the past few years. No wonder all these airlines are bankrupt.

[Captain_Bob]

Originally Posted by Doug Taylor

But the whole idea of competing subcontractors beating their brains out to provide lift under an "Express/Connection/Whatever" banner is another facet of what's destroyed the piloting profession.

Originally Posted by B767Driver

Strongly Agree....I'd have to say our profession won't be respectable again until all of the subcontractors stop underbidding everyone else.... I ate lunch with a 46 year old United 757 Captain today.... he said, "These RJs have ruined our profession. I'm quitting to become a general contractor."

Makes me wonder... is that 757 Captain going to hire Plumber's, Electricians, hole diggers, and Carpenters, to work directly for him? Or do you think it's more likely he will "sub" out the work to save himself some costs like tools, trucks, fuel, workman's comp, unemployement insurance, federal taxes, benefits, 401k matching, etc... ?

I guess that's as close to borderline flaimbait as I've ever come on here... but... I don't think it's neccessarily cheaper for any business... or I guess more specifically any Airline to do all of it's own flying when you consider the cost of different fleet types, different MX inventory and issues, different training issues, etc...

I think I'm more of the mindset that if CAL or any of the legacies, don't want to do the short haul flying (IAH-CLL for example) or the 50 seat flying... then they should just not do it, and let companies like Colgan, XJT, CHQ, PSA, TSA, etc... be themselves and compete and offer service as themselves in those hubs. "Thank you for flying Trans-States, Chatauqua, Skywest, or ExpressJet Airlines today." Let them battle it out themselves, and see who comes out on top...

If I'm way off base here and this is going to start a PFT/PFJ type issue, then please school me...

Bob

[BobDDuck]

I don't think anybody is going to school you Bob... you are pretty much right on. It *is* cheaper to farm stuff out but by doing that the airline loses direct control of it's product and that may end up costing them in the end. Xjet guys know, just as every other wholly owned knows (even though they aren't truly WO anymore) that your future is tied very closely to that of your Daddy carrier. The companies providing contract service, while relying on keeping the contract for growth won't cease to exsist if they lose some service agreements. Does this lead to these companies caring less? I don't know, but it is certainly posible. I'm not pointing fingers at anyone, but I have overheard on three different occasions crews from contract feeders state something like "well, if they don't like us they will axe our service and we'll just go back to flying for only X and Y brand." That's certainly not an option for the WOs and remains to be seen how well it works for companies who only have agreements with one carrier (XJet, ASA etc). At least for these single carrier companies there is the option of going off the reservation and finding other work. On the flip side, the WOs are more protected in the sense that if the Daddy carrier was to liquidate for some reason they would likely be sold off whole as opposed to being liquidated themselves. Moral of the story? From a business security point of view it makes sense for the independant regionals to diversify. From a economic point of view it makes some sense for mainline carriers to farm out their feed (although there are certain exceptions, the company I fly for being one of them, where the WO is providing much more of an income stream then the contract feeds). However (and this is the BIG issue as far as I can tell) is that by keeping the feed inhouse the parent carrier is able to control the quality.

[DE727UPS]

"If I'm way off base here and this is going to start a PFT/PFJ type issue, then please school me..."

I think the issue here is what is better from an overall pilot career standpoint and what is better from an airline stockholder/management standpoint. Who's side you're on pretty much answers the question.

I think it would be better for pilots and their careers to have one list and keep the flying in house, at as competitive of wages as possible. Then again, I look at it from a pro-pilot/pro-union angle. From a stockholder/management standpoint, Walmarting it puts the most money in your pocket, so you'd go with that.

[Captain_Bob]

Hey there DE... well, I'm obviously on the pro-pilot side... but with a little bit of a management (not airline) background... Kinda hard to break from that I guess...

Anyway, what are your thoughts on this statement?

Originally Posted by Captain_Bob

I think I'm more of the mindset that if CAL or any of the legacies, don't want to do the short haul flying (IAH-CLL for example) or the 50 seat flying... then they should just not do it, and let companies like Colgan, XJT, CHQ, PSA, TSA, etc... be themselves and compete and offer service as themselves in those hubs. "Thank you for flying Trans-States, Chatauqua, Skywest, or ExpressJet Airlines today." Let them battle it out themselves, and see who comes out on top...

It would allow the whole "buy a ticket on UAL and you'd be flying UAL" issue. I'm also thinking that a few of the Regionals/Commuters would die out due to an inability to compete directly with each other... versus competeing based on subsidized flying from the legacies...

Bob

[DE727UPS]

Hey there Capt Bob. Glad to hear your more pro-pilot than pro-management.

Once upon a time. America West had Dash 8's. They said America West on the side of them and the pilots that flew them were on the America West seniority list. That's the way it should have been for all the airlines. They also had free booze and free Wall Street Journals. What a great concept. I mean, in the overall scheme of things, what could free booze, free Wall Street Journals, and pilots making the same flying Dash 8's as Horizon Dash 8 pilots really cost?

I guess what I'm saying is it's been proven that a large airline could operate turboprops. Those pilots could be on the same list and work for wages comparable to industry standards.

Of course, that's my perfect world. Ego's and the perception, or reality, that another dime could be made, messed it all up.

[Captain_Bob]

Originally Posted by DE727UPS

Of course, that's my perfect world. Ego's and the perception, or reality, that another dime could be made, messed it all up.

LOL! Yeah... I think we've all been there before. I'm sure that half of all my ideas would work if someone just did them... cost be damned!

Thanks for the response... and right now I'm wishing I was flying on a Dash 8... WSJ in one hand... and a jack and coke in the other...

Bob

[WestIndian425]

Originally Posted by GaTechKid

IMO, the CRJ is a better looking jet. The ERJ, especially the 145, looks like it could snap in half at any time. Hell, even the slaab is a wee bit wider than an ERJ.

True, but the ERJ definitely outperforms the CRJ in climb, range, and speed. I personally like them both (well, the CRJ 700 and ERJ 145).

Neil

[Doug Taylor]

I'm not sure if you can put the words "performance", "climb" and "CRJ100/200" into the same sentence!

[flyover]

Originally Posted by Captain_Bob

Makes me wonder... is that 757 Captain going to hire Plumber's, Electricians, hole diggers, and Carpenters, to work directly for him? Or do you think it's more likely he will "sub" out the work to save himself some costs like tools, trucks, fuel, workman's comp, unemployement insurance, federal taxes, benefits, 401k matching, etc... ?

And the other funny thing is: he's not going to quit. I've been hearing guys say that for 30 years. Never seen one quit, unless it was to salvage a pension payout.

Another funny thing: it was ALPA (at least at my airline) that wanted scope so they wouldn't have mainline salaries diluted by low paying equipment. As far as I know they still don't want to fly the stuff.

The only time I've ever had ALPA reps get really worked up (at me) was when I would suggest bringing all the flying under one contract. Let's just say it would take a lot of bleeping to repeat their responses. And that was whether it was 1985 or 2001.

[flyover]

Originally Posted by Doug Taylor

The only time you should use the phrase "good looking" is when talking about the DC-8 stretch.

mmmmm stretch 8.

[EDUC8-or]

Originally Posted by Doug Taylor

I'm not sure if you can put the words "performance", "climb" and "CRJ100/200" into the same sentence!

C'mon, we we're able to do 500 FPM up to FL280 the other day and we were indicating a whopping 270 in the climb. What a dog...

[Doug Taylor]

And everyone else was doing 270 behind you too!

[B767Driver]

Originally Posted by flyover

And the other funny thing is: he's not going to quit. I've been hearing guys say that for 30 years. Never seen one quit, unless it was to salvage a pension payout.

Another funny thing: it was ALPA (at least at my airline) that wanted scope so they wouldn't have mainline salaries diluted by low paying equipment. As far as I know they still don't want to fly the stuff.

The only time I've ever had ALPA reps get really worked up (at me) was when I would suggest bringing all the flying under one contract. Let's just say it would take a lot of bleeping to repeat their responses. And that was whether it was 1985 or 2001.

Yep. They (ALPA) obviously don't want anything to do with RJs over here. I guess we're too good for them.