jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > General > General Topics

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 26th, 2006, 21:23   #1
meritflyer
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Winchestertonfieldville
Posts: 6,802
Default VLJ v. Turboprop - Private Air

I read an article today in Private Air that dogged hard on King Airs and other cool turboprops while trying to boost the VLJ image. It featured John and Martha King talking about a bunch of piston single engine pilots jumping into their new VLJ. I think its total BS!

The King Air, Pilatus, Meridian, and TBM are awesome aircraft. I think the VLJ thing is going to be a total disaster.

It seems that TP manufacturers are taking aim back at the VLJ makers in effort to stomp the VLJ hype before it begins. The TP makers will do this by enhancing power, fuel efficiency, avionics, cabin size, and DOCs. The PC-12 and TBM 850 have already started to improve their aircraft in order to compete with the VLJs. The new TBM 850 cruises at a crazy 320 KIAS at FL260.

VLJs are cool, but the TP makers will step up their game and we should see some pretty awesome advances in the TP aircraft industry.
__________________
The simplest answer tends to be correct.
meritflyer is offline  
Old March 26th, 2006, 22:23   #2
Shemsey
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 79
Default

it's not going to be a disaster, it's called evolution dude
Shemsey is offline  
Old March 26th, 2006, 22:31   #3
Doug Taylor
Agent Smith
 
Doug Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: KSDL
Posts: 41,926
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Doug Taylor Send a message via Skype™ to Doug Taylor
Default

I think the whol VLJ hype is a lot like "It".

"It" was going to revolutionize human transport.

Cities were going to redesign themselves around people using "It".

"It" was going to make the world safer, more efficient and cleaner.

When "It" finally debuted, it was a $3,000 scooter.
__________________
Doug Taylor
http://76school.flyblog.com (old!)
http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28)
Doug Taylor is offline  
Old March 26th, 2006, 22:37   #4
ComplexHiAv8r
Old Skool
 
ComplexHiAv8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OH or is it MX??
Posts: 4,881
Send a message via AIM to ComplexHiAv8r
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Taylor
When "It" finally debuted, it was a $3,000 scooter.
But it was a "COOL" scooter!!!! Technology wise, it was a great accomplishment, IMO. Now there is a $500 knock-off of it.
ComplexHiAv8r is offline  
Old March 26th, 2006, 23:03   #5
skyhawk39
Junior Member
 
skyhawk39's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KLUF
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shemsey
it's not going to be a disaster, it's called evolution dude
I would love nothing more that to see VLJ's and the aircraft that have sprung from NASA's SATS program (such as the Cirrus and the Columbia) become big players in the Air Taxi market and take a bite out of the Air Carriers. Maybe with the mandate of Low Sulfur diesel and some other new things in the petrochemical market they can get turboprops back to a more competitive footing with the VLJ's....

You hear a lot of stuff around about how "perhaps some private pilot will suddenly be in the flight levels, causing problems for us...blah blah blah..." The cost of these things are going to preclude this, just like the cost of a turboprop still does. I know a dude that has a Colombia that uses it to travel all over the Western US with his two business partners, all the time in the flight levels, and a heck of a lot cheaper AND faster (point to point) than the airlines. I've given him BFR's and IPC's and he is not a slacker in the cockpit, and I'd trust him more than some ATP/Captains I've met....thing is he can afford the airplane, and the training that is required to fly the airplane. If a person is going to be there, they will know what they are doing, the insurance companies and the manufacturers and (eventually) the FAA will see to that. I think when it comes out in the end though, probably 90% of the new VLJ's will be bought by corporate flight departments and Air Taxi guys trying to make a living with them.

I was part of an economic and use study on the Air Taxi market in the southwest and there is a potential here...getting the word out and getting people to understand the savings of flying directly into a place rather than being cattle to Seattle is where the key is....
__________________
ATP, CFI, CFII, MEI, USAFR Viper IP

"they come to snuff the rooster"
skyhawk39 is offline  
Old March 26th, 2006, 23:45   #6
RynoB
Senior Member
 
RynoB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bixby, OK
Posts: 645
Default

VLJs are intended to fit a niche market. Turboprobs will be affected by them, but not as much as the VLJ makers would like to think. A King Air 90 or PC-12 can still carry a heavier load than many of the VLJs. I know some owner-pilots that fly light jets (Citation 500 & 525) that perform very professionally. The insurance companies and FAA have done a good job to make sure they get the proper training (and annual recurrent traing.
__________________
Ryan
ATP (CE525, CE510, BE-300), SIC BE-400, CFI, CFII, MEI, IGI

States I've landed in:
RynoB is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 00:12   #7
Texasspilot
Old Skool
 
Texasspilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,080
Default

I don't even know how those little things stay in the air.....wheres the propeller?
Texasspilot is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 00:19   #8
Foxcow
Senior Member
 
Foxcow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,114
Send a message via AIM to Foxcow
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meritflyer
The new TBM 850 cruises at a crazy 320 KIAS at FL260.


That has to be KTAS
__________________
Downgraded...

Foxcow is online now  
Old March 27th, 2006, 01:02   #9
EatSleepFly
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RynoB
I know some owner-pilots that fly light jets (Citation 500 & 525) that perform very professionally.
Yeah, and for every one of them, there's half a dozen flying larger twin/turbine equipment that shouldn't even be flying a 210.
EatSleepFly is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 01:23   #10
Doug Taylor
Agent Smith
 
Doug Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: KSDL
Posts: 41,926
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Doug Taylor Send a message via Skype™ to Doug Taylor
Default

Ahh, the 210! The "High-wing ExecuKiller!"

"It's got boots and a turbocharger, she's made to penetrate thunderstorms..."
__________________
Doug Taylor
http://76school.flyblog.com (old!)
http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28)
Doug Taylor is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 01:24   #11
EatSleepFly
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Taylor
Ahh, the 210! The "High-wing ExecuKiller!"

"It's got boots and a turbocharger, she's made to penetrate thunderstorms..."
Richard Collins? What?
EatSleepFly is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 01:28   #12
Doug Taylor
Agent Smith
 
Doug Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: KSDL
Posts: 41,926
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Doug Taylor Send a message via Skype™ to Doug Taylor
Default

"Those 777 drivers look at my 210 and I tell 'em to bow down and behold!"
__________________
Doug Taylor
http://76school.flyblog.com (old!)
http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28)
Doug Taylor is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 10:26   #13
NJA_Capt
Senior Member
 
NJA_Capt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Low Earth Orbit
Posts: 1,389
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RynoB
A King Air 90 or PC-12 can still carry a heavier load than many of the VLJs.
It's not a question of load capability. Use this site as an example;How many guys on here have dreams of flying the Dash8 and the ATR? Very few, everyone wants the RJ because it's a jet. The VLJs are going to be for day trips with a few people and very few, if any baggage. That being said, the Eclipse is going to priced very close to that of a new Baron. Do you think Mr Owner/pilot will want to fly his golf buddies in his shaky new piston twin or his cool new jet? (No offense to the Baron)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RynoB
I know some owner-pilots that fly light jets (Citation 500 & 525) that perform very professionally.
It only takes a handful to ruin a good thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RynoB
The insurance companies and FAA have done a good job to make sure they get the proper training (and annual recurrent training.
The April 2006 Flying Magazine Aftermath is a great example that contradicts this line of thought. With enough time and money a person can get himself legally qualified.
NJA_Capt is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 11:16   #14
OldTownPilot
Old Skool
 
OldTownPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: BGR (Bangor, ME)
Posts: 3,159
Blog Entries: 9
Send a message via AIM to OldTownPilot
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJA_Capt
It's not a question of load capability. Use this site as an example;How many guys on here have dreams of flying the Dash8 and the ATR? Very few, everyone wants the RJ because it's a jet. The VLJs are going to be for day trips with a few people and very few, if any baggage. That being said, the Eclipse is going to priced very close to that of a new Baron. Do you think Mr Owner/pilot will want to fly his golf buddies in his shaky new piston twin or his cool new jet? (No offense to the Baron)
I personally would rather fly a B-99 for a 135 freight company, after I got 1200 hrs, than be an FO on a RJ. Multi-Turbine PIC right off for a stable company, or RJ FO for 3-5 years then be a captain, working for less and less to compete against your fellow ALPA pilots for your own job.

I think I'll take the freight. I know I am in the minority however.
__________________
As a wise man said, sumb!tch flew in, sumb!tch'll fly out.

Ski Hard. Party Harder.
OldTownPilot is online now  
Old March 27th, 2006, 11:16   #15
tonyw
Old Skool
 
tonyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 15,922
Send a message via AIM to tonyw Send a message via MSN to tonyw Send a message via Yahoo to tonyw
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJA_Capt
Use this site as an example;How many guys on here have dreams of flying the Dash8 and the ATR? Very few, everyone wants the RJ because it's a jet.
That used to be me. Now? I don't care what I fly, as long as it's safe and I'm compensated decently. I guess I've gotten cynical and jaded.
__________________


http://www.photo.net/photos/tonywang for my photos
tonyw is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 11:23   #16
desertdog71
Old Skool
 
desertdog71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: KIDP/KCNU
Posts: 3,008
Send a message via AIM to desertdog71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Taylor
Ahh, the 210! The "High-wing ExecuKiller!"

"It's got boots and a turbocharger, she's made to penetrate thunderstorms..."
Is this similar to the "V-tailed Doctor Killer?"

I have heard some derogatory things about 210 owners myself.
Must be some truth to it. I heard a couple 210 pilots the other day switch frequencies and start bragging to eachother about their rate of climb and crap.
__________________
www.flywhiteair.com
http://www.myspace.com/desertdog71


Following message is for SkyCougar.
Took my chances on a big jet plane, Never let them tell you that they're all the same.
desertdog71 is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 11:26   #17
averyrm
Old Skool
 
averyrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LCK
Posts: 1,654
Default

I'm still wondering about the "Eclipse mentor program" deal. Who, at 5k hours, would want pay for the "priviledge" to babysit an owner/operator?
__________________
<-- That guy with Belushi as his avitar
averyrm is online now  
Old March 27th, 2006, 11:30   #18
Doug Taylor
Agent Smith
 
Doug Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: KSDL
Posts: 41,926
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Doug Taylor Send a message via Skype™ to Doug Taylor
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdog71
Is this similar to the "V-tailed Doctor Killer?"
It's a very capable aircraft, but I think it suffers from people thinking the aircraft is going to babysit them in scenarios which far outpace their experience levels.

People get a little wrapped up into the capabiities of an aircraft without recognizing that it doesn't replace judgement and experience.

I know it sounds cynical, but I fear the VLJ "revolution" is going to take the "210 kings", the 100-hour lawyer with a 285 HP Bonanza and the people that go traipsing off into moderate rime icing in a Cirrus because it's got weeping wings and a parachute and put them up into the flight levels.

They're very capable aircraft with a lot of neat systems and nice displays, but high-altitude, high-speed, swept wing flight is no place for a rookie.

Especially not a schwarm of thousands.
__________________
Doug Taylor
http://76school.flyblog.com (old!)
http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28)
Doug Taylor is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 11:35   #19
Doug Taylor
Agent Smith
 
Doug Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: KSDL
Posts: 41,926
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Doug Taylor Send a message via Skype™ to Doug Taylor
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by averyrm
I'm still wondering about the "Eclipse mentor program" deal. Who, at 5k hours, would want pay for the "priviledge" to babysit an owner/operator?
It might be fun for me, but it's going to involve a lot of flight instruction and my services aren't free!

If I've got to constantly remind a owner/operator at low/high buffet margins and that you simplly can bust into a 45 degree turn at FL320 while under positive control, I'm gettin' paid!
__________________
Doug Taylor
http://76school.flyblog.com (old!)
http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28)
Doug Taylor is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 11:38   #20
averyrm
Old Skool
 
averyrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LCK
Posts: 1,654
Default

I understand they're going to be compensated, but they have to pay for all the training to be a mentor.

I'd imagine the training can't be cheap..
__________________
<-- That guy with Belushi as his avitar
averyrm is online now  
Old March 27th, 2006, 11:38   #21
desertdog71
Old Skool
 
desertdog71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: KIDP/KCNU
Posts: 3,008
Send a message via AIM to desertdog71
Default

We had a 210 in for repair at my school/FBO and one of the other students was able to fly it for about 10 minutes while the boss was doing a check flight in it. He said it was really easy to get behind the airplane, and got a little dose of reality as far as his plans for buying a high performance plane right away.
__________________
www.flywhiteair.com
http://www.myspace.com/desertdog71


Following message is for SkyCougar.
Took my chances on a big jet plane, Never let them tell you that they're all the same.
desertdog71 is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 12:30   #22
skyhawk39
Junior Member
 
skyhawk39's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KLUF
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Taylor
They're very capable aircraft with a lot of neat systems and nice displays, but high-altitude, high-speed, swept wing flight is no place for a rookie.

Especially not a schwarm of thousands.
Hmmm... has anyone at ALPA, ATA or the other all mighty unions ever thought about telling the regionals the same thing ?
__________________
ATP, CFI, CFII, MEI, USAFR Viper IP

"they come to snuff the rooster"
skyhawk39 is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 12:57   #23
Doug Taylor
Agent Smith
 
Doug Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: KSDL
Posts: 41,926
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Doug Taylor Send a message via Skype™ to Doug Taylor
Default

The ATA is the "Airline Transport Association" more or less the Lex Luthor to organized labor at the airlines.
__________________
Doug Taylor
http://76school.flyblog.com (old!)
http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28)
Doug Taylor is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 13:03   #24
Kingairer
Old Skool
 
Kingairer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nomadic...World Wide Boobie Bungalow Bouncer
Posts: 3,215
Default

More idiots in the air flying faster is always a good thing!
__________________
"I do not proofread"
Kingairer is offline  
Old March 27th, 2006, 13:49   #25
EatSleepFly
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldTownPilot

I think I'll take the freight. I know I am in the minority however.
Yeah, you're in the minority who will have a lot of PIC time, and better experience than the 10,000 twenty-somethings with assloads of RJ SIC time.

You won't regret it.
EatSleepFly is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2008 jetcareers.com