jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > Career Specific > Freight Pilots/"OOTSK"

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 10th, 2007, 16:21   #1
Okie_Pilot
Junior Member
 
Okie_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 81
Default Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Ok. Say my first year and half, two years in college, I manage to get my CFI certificate and start instructing my last two years or so in college. When I visited the flight line of OSU, and talked to an instructor, I asked him about how many hours he instructed in a week. He responded with "We instruct/fly about 20 hours a week." Ok, that comes out to 80/month, 960/year. Since I would be going to college full time and all that, let's just say that I take it a little easier, or don't have that many students, and only instruct 15 hours/week, or a little over 600/year.

Hypothetically, in two years time, one would have 1200 hours, hopefully some multi thrown in there too, once I got my MEI rating too.

Long term goal. Majors, FedEx, ABXAir, etc. etc.

With 1200 hours, CFII/MEI, do you think I could get hired on by a regional? A better regional that is, not Mesa, or some other "Commercial certificate and your hired" companies.

What I'm trying to say is. Whether it be a pax Major, or FedEx, ABXAir, UPS. Would they look very differently on if I came from a Regional, or say a FedEx feeder like Mountain Air Cargo? Mountain Air Cargo has Caravans, Shorts, and ATR42/72's. We all know the overall "general" requirements for the regionals. Mountain Air Cargo's requirement for a FO is:
1000 hours total time
500 PIC
100 Multi-engine
(or equivalent –will discuss) Commercial license with Multi-engine & Instrument ratings
Current 1st Class Medical
U.S. work authorization required

They don't list a FO for the Caravan, since I'm assuming that would be single pilot operation anyways. If my long time goal would be to go to FedEx, or a Major, would it make a big difference if I came from a regional or a feeder like MAC?

I wish I had more time to add to this, but I have to go right now. All of your opinions and thoughts are appreciated.


--Okie_Pilot
Okie_Pilot is offline  
Old July 10th, 2007, 16:55   #2
E6BAV8R
Senior Member
 
E6BAV8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 799
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Sorry I dont have an answer to the question, but which OSU are you talking about? Just wondering
E6BAV8R is offline  
Old July 10th, 2007, 17:49   #3
Flyboy 4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 120
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

I wish I had the answer to this too. I have been browsing small frieght companies web pages as well. I will be watching this thread for answers. Hope you don't mind me piggy backin on your thread.
Flyboy 4 is offline  
Old July 10th, 2007, 18:44   #4
Trip7
Old Skool
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,040
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Either way will get you where you want to go. Comes down to which kind of flying you enjoy.
Trip7 is offline  
Old July 10th, 2007, 18:49   #5
Doug Taylor
Agent Smith
 
Doug Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: KSDL
Posts: 41,926
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Doug Taylor Send a message via Skype™ to Doug Taylor
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Turbine multi-engine PIC is king. Notice I didn't differentiate "jet" from "turboprop".

There are guys from pretty much all walks of aviation that I've flown with.

Naturally, airlines love military pilots. But I've also flown with, or know, many pilots at my airlines that came straight over from turboprop regionals (me), jet regionals, single-pilot operations like Ameriflight and lots of corporate flight departments.
__________________
Doug Taylor
http://76school.flyblog.com (old!)
http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28)
Doug Taylor is offline  
Old July 10th, 2007, 20:34   #6
n57flyguy
Old Skool
 
n57flyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,803
Send a message via AIM to n57flyguy
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

1,200 hours CFI/MEI should be enough to go regional, they are just hiring like crazy. And of course if you are competent enough....

DT, are there really a lot that come from corporate?
__________________
Proud member of the JetCareers
Really, Really Mini-Libertarian Movement
I'll keep my freedom, my guns, and my money... you can keep "THE CHANGE"
n57flyguy is offline  
Old July 10th, 2007, 21:52   #7
Doug Taylor
Agent Smith
 
Doug Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: KSDL
Posts: 41,926
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to Doug Taylor Send a message via Skype™ to Doug Taylor
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Came, yes, but I've only met a corporate guy or two from the second new hire class that I ran into during 76 school.
__________________
Doug Taylor
http://76school.flyblog.com (old!)
http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28)
Doug Taylor is offline  
Old July 10th, 2007, 21:57   #8
OldTownPilot
Old Skool
 
OldTownPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: BGR (Bangor, ME)
Posts: 3,158
Blog Entries: 9
Send a message via AIM to OldTownPilot
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

There is a guy that had zero multi turbine time when he was hired by CAL about a year ago. All his multi was in a piston twin and his turbine in a Caravan.

Plenty of guys at CAL from Ameriflight, Airnet, the fracs and corprate.
__________________
As a wise man said, sumb!tch flew in, sumb!tch'll fly out.

Ski Hard. Party Harder.
OldTownPilot is offline  
Old July 11th, 2007, 00:35   #9
Okie_Pilot
Junior Member
 
Okie_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 81
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Flyboy4, everybody's welcome to ask questions pertaining to this, I might learn about something I didn't think about. This is the best site you can come to if you need advice or help.

I was trying to look at it from the Major side. If the regular Majors would look at flying the ATR42/72 or Shorts, or even Caravan as well as compared to a CRJ/ERJ etc. etc.

Say I flew the ATR42/72, or any multi-engine turbine, for Mountain Air Cargo, a large feeder for FedEx. Since I would have experience flying cargo at night, would FedEx look at this experience to be more "valuable" than say a guy coming from a regional?

I'm trying to see if this would be a more favorable route to take if I was planning to go the cargo route, or if it would be a not so good route if I was trying to get to a regular Major airline.

Mountain Air Cargo looks like a pretty good company to work for. No pilot layoff's in the company's 30 year operation. All first year FO's starting at $25,000 sounds pretty good compared to some of the starting regional salaries we've all heard about. Then the first year for the Caravan captain is at $32,800. The site this is on, also says a $27/day per diem. Does this sound normal? Per diem like that would only sound like international travel or something.

Thank you for your opinions and advice. As you read above, I'm not the only one looking for a little advice on this topic.


E6BAV8R, OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY!!


--Okie_Pilot
Okie_Pilot is offline  
Old July 11th, 2007, 11:23   #10
wheelsup
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: _
Posts: 5,611
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

You might want to do some in depth research of Mountain Air Cargo and it's hiring and upgrade practices. The last I heard upgrade, left seat into the bigger turbines was around 5 years although that could change I suppose.

Going from the Van to the ATR takes a long time (according to a source on FI.com the last person to do it was at MAC for 6 years on the Van before he was able to move over). No matter what anyone will tell you turbine PIC is turbine PIC but I wouldn't pin my hopes on Delta interviewing you because of all your Biggie Sized C172 time. Multi turbine time is king, not single.

The per diem is for floaters only I believe, unless they've changed that recently too.
__________________
"It takes just as much time to be nice to someone as it does to be a jerk."
wheelsup is offline  
Old July 11th, 2007, 11:57   #11
mikecweb
Old Skool
 
mikecweb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,952
Send a message via AIM to mikecweb Send a message via Yahoo to mikecweb Send a message via Skype™ to mikecweb
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Depending on your flexibility with bases you might wanna take a look at Airnet or Ameriflight. At Airnet you can fly piston multis or Caravans right out of training and upgrade to the lear is a little over a year. There is alot of movement in the company right now. Guys are getting nervous that the regional hiring boom is going to slow down so they wanna get out and get a number before it's too late.
It's more then just the route that will take you to a major the quickest however. Flying freight vs. regionals are two completely different animals. As much as we might poke fun at each other neither is better then the other, they just demand different things out of the pilots. Flying on the backside of the clock in old airplanes freaks some people out. Flying anything with 50 people it the back freaks some people out too.
I love flying freight. If I could, I would do it for the rest of my career. I just get a sense of accomplishment when all that stuff back there makes it's connection or destination on time, even though the conditions weren't ideal and required alot of my planning and execution with no one there to give me guidance. If grandama Jean and the drunk guy sitting two rows in front of her, who has been complaining the whole time, miss their connection I really could careless. It's just a personal preference however.
You can get to a Major from flying freight. Just realize however, if you haven't flown with any passengers before are you you really ready to flying with 100+ in the back? There is alot of customer relations involved with flying people. I have never seen my customer flying freight. All we see is the cargo. Good luck and feel free to PM me any other questions about Airnet.
Oh and wheels don't call it a biggie sized 172.
__________________
mikecweb is offline  
Old July 11th, 2007, 16:24   #12
Okie_Pilot
Junior Member
 
Okie_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 81
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Ouch, 5 years upgrade time from Caravan to Multi. I've looked at AirNet for awhile and it seems like a really good operation. Multi-time in the Baron, and a short upgrade time to the Lear. Mikecweb, what is the average upgrade time from Learjet FO, to Captain?

I was smiling about the Mountain Air Cargo, since it's a feeder for FedEx, and they were flying the larger ATR42/72's and the pay seemed pretty good compared to others, but sheesh, why would I want to spend over 5 years flying a Caravan, then also the time sitting as FO in the ATR, when I could already of been sitting in a Lear for the past 3?

Another concern I was wondering about was. How much does it matter to the Majors if it was 2500 hours sitting in a Lear, or 2500 hours sitting in a RJ? Or is it all the same since they have to train you for the aircraft you'll be flying anyways?

If I already had 1200tt when I got out of college, I wouldn't want to spend another 3 or more flying cargo to apply for the same regional I could of gotten a job at, right out of college. I'm talking about either going from college to a regional then to major, or college to cargo then to major.


Thanks for all the help guys.


--Okie_Pilot
Okie_Pilot is offline  
Old July 11th, 2007, 17:04   #13
KLB
Old Skool
 
KLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,000
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Turbine is turbine as far as the majors are concerned.
KLB is offline  
Old July 11th, 2007, 17:20   #14
n57flyguy
Old Skool
 
n57flyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,803
Send a message via AIM to n57flyguy
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Taylor View Post
Came, yes, but I've only met a corporate guy or two from the second new hire class that I ran into during 76 school.
Ah, okay, It seems right now, I have got NO idea where I want to go, but it might be worth it to just try it out (sorta sounds naive).
__________________
Proud member of the JetCareers
Really, Really Mini-Libertarian Movement
I'll keep my freedom, my guns, and my money... you can keep "THE CHANGE"
n57flyguy is offline  
Old July 11th, 2007, 18:04   #15
wheelsup
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: _
Posts: 5,611
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikecweb View Post
Oh and wheels don't call it a biggie sized 172.
Hey if it makes you feel any better you can call the RJ a "Barbie Jet" .
__________________
"It takes just as much time to be nice to someone as it does to be a jerk."
wheelsup is offline  
Old July 11th, 2007, 19:16   #16
JayAre
Senior Member
 
JayAre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Multiple
Posts: 1,042
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Quote:
Originally Posted by KLB View Post
Turbine is turbine as far as the majors are concerned.
That depends. I have heard of three AMF pilots interview with SWA Than I heard some from PHX interviewed with other majors and got the thanks but no thanks come back when you have 121 crew time.

But I agree with you thats why Im staying, and going the cargo route.
__________________
Im voting for "That one"
JayAre is offline  
Old July 12th, 2007, 01:07   #17
TheOneMarine
Senior Member
 
TheOneMarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: If it isn't ORL, I'm not happy :(
Posts: 655
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

JayAre, or anyone for that matter, what if you start and continue to fly and aircraft like a Shorts 360 or lear that requires a 2 man crew, would they still want it to be 121 time? Hope someone can clear this up.
__________________
-Chuck Norris once roundhouse kicked someone so hard that his foot broke the speed of light, went back in time, and killed Amelia Earhart while she was flying over the Pacific Ocean.
TheOneMarine is offline  
Old July 12th, 2007, 01:19   #18
Beers
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 63
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOneMarine View Post
JayAre, or anyone for that matter, what if you start and continue to fly and aircraft like a Shorts 360 or lear that requires a 2 man crew, would they still want it to be 121 time? Hope someone can clear this up.
In the past there were some airlines that did specify a number of hours of 121 time as one of the requirements. I think AirTran was one of them. For the majority it does not seem to matter as long as you have crew time, multi-turbine time, and multi-turbine PIC.

The major advantage of going to a regional over cargo if your career is a major is the fact you will be flying with many different people who are headed the same direction as you. Captains you will fly with will move on to a company you want to be at and can give you some help and/or a letter of recommendation to help with getting and passing the interview. You will not get as many of those connections in cargo, however cargo may provide you a wider variety of connections in different segments of the industry.
Beers is offline  
Old July 12th, 2007, 01:38   #19
TheOneMarine
Senior Member
 
TheOneMarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: If it isn't ORL, I'm not happy :(
Posts: 655
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beers View Post
In the past there were some airlines that did specify a number of hours of 121 time as one of the requirements. I think AirTran was one of them. For the majority it does not seem to matter as long as you have crew time, multi-turbine time, and multi-turbine PIC.

The major advantage of going to a regional over cargo if your career is a major is the fact you will be flying with many different people who are headed the same direction as you. Captains you will fly with will move on to a company you want to be at and can give you some help and/or a letter of recommendation to help with getting and passing the interview. You will not get as many of those connections in cargo, however cargo may provide you a wider variety of connections in different segments of the industry.

Yea, makes sense. But the only airline I would want honestly is SWA. Other than that all I really want is to go corporate or big cargo like FedEx, UPS, etc. Just not my cup of tea dealing with all those random people. Would much rather have a steady customer base
__________________
-Chuck Norris once roundhouse kicked someone so hard that his foot broke the speed of light, went back in time, and killed Amelia Earhart while she was flying over the Pacific Ocean.
TheOneMarine is offline  
Old July 12th, 2007, 12:36   #20
KLB
Old Skool
 
KLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,000
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Man where have you been? Has your ole lady popped yet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayAre View Post
That depends. I have heard of three AMF pilots interview with SWA Than I heard some from PHX interviewed with other majors and got the thanks but no thanks come back when you have 121 crew time.

But I agree with you thats why Im staying, and going the cargo route.
KLB is offline  
Old July 12th, 2007, 12:47   #21
jtrain609
Old Skool
 
jtrain609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 12,869
Send a message via ICQ to jtrain609 Send a message via AIM to jtrain609
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Rumor has it she did.
__________________




"Jetlink 2940, on another radio, contact clearance for new airways..."
jtrain609 is offline  
Old July 13th, 2007, 13:05   #22
KLB
Old Skool
 
KLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,000
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayAre View Post
That depends. I have heard of three AMF pilots interview with SWA Than I heard some from PHX interviewed with other majors and got the thanks but no thanks come back when you have 121 crew time.
I agree with that. If SWA didn't want to atleast take a look at the guys, they wouldn't have invited them to the interview. The truth is that they have so many applicants to pick and chose from. It's really good that we have so many people atleast being invited to interview when we're only a group of about 200 pilots.

Imagine how many pilots with the 121 experience that get the thanks but no thanks.
KLB is offline  
Old July 13th, 2007, 13:09   #23
jtrain609
Old Skool
 
jtrain609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 12,869
Send a message via ICQ to jtrain609 Send a message via AIM to jtrain609
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

I've heard Southwest interviews just to interview, and will only hire a quarter of the folks they interview.
__________________




"Jetlink 2940, on another radio, contact clearance for new airways..."
jtrain609 is offline  
Old July 13th, 2007, 13:33   #24
KLB
Old Skool
 
KLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,000
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Thats not what they said in the open house that I went to last year. They said that if they called you in they were looking to hire you. They could have just been BS'ing though. Like I said, they have so many people wanting to be there....you have to be virtually perfect.
KLB is offline  
Old July 13th, 2007, 19:58   #25
JayAre
Senior Member
 
JayAre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Multiple
Posts: 1,042
Default Re: Regional vs Cargo route to Major

Quote:
Originally Posted by KLB View Post
Man where have you been? Has your ole lady popped yet.
Thead Jack
Dude check out the family life section youll see my post

U finished the 99 yet?


Thread back

ugh
__________________
Im voting for "That one"

Last edited by JayAre; July 13th, 2007 at 20:00. Reason: im iz more domber then stupud
JayAre is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2008 jetcareers.com