jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > Career Specific > Freight Pilots/"OOTSK"

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 2nd, 2006, 17:32   #1
Coney
Junior Member
 
Coney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 3T5
Posts: 256
Default A Discussion with the Chief Pilot

I recently took it upon myself to call the chief pilot of a certain freight company, which I'll not disclose (but they operate C-208s). In our discussion, the chief pilot explained that if he were to review a resume showing that an applicant has 3,000 TT with 2,500 hours of that being dual given, it would probably go to the bottom of the resume stack.

His rationale is that the applicant hasn't enough real world experience, which he considers to be single-pilot night IFR. So, I began to wonder what sort of jobs would provide such experience for a pilot.

If instructing isn't sufficient, what is?
__________________
J. Cone

My Blog
http://www.jeromecone.blogspot.com
Coney is offline  
Old August 2nd, 2006, 18:32   #2
averyrm
Old Skool
 
averyrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: LCK
Posts: 1,653
Default Re: A Discussion with the Chief Pilot

I'd say instructing is a great experience builder, but single-pilot IFR at night is a whole 'nother animal.

I know a ton of places hire CFI's, including a lot of single-pilot night IFR type of operations. This guy must have a lot of qualified applicants to choose from in order to dismiss such a resume, though.

One other thing I've heard is when someone racks up a few thousand hours dual given some people wonder "whats wrong." IE why didn't they move on from instructing to something "bigger and better." - I'm not saying this is a vaild opinion or not, but I have heard of it existing.
__________________
<-- That guy with Belushi as his avitar
averyrm is offline  
Old August 2nd, 2006, 19:32   #3
Texasspilot
Old Skool
 
Texasspilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,080
Default Re: A Discussion with the Chief Pilot

Sounds like you probably talked to one of the Fedex feeders. If thats the case then they do have quite a few qualified applicants to choose from and with there pay and beni's they can choose to be picky.

However if you're talking about a standard 135 operator most wouldn't have a problem with hiring someone like you described. Certainly previous 135 and single pilot time is helpful but not necessary...but if they can choose to have guys with 3000 hours and 1500 single pilot night ifr over someone who has 3000 hours with 2500 dual given the choice is clear as to whome has the most experience relavant to the job.


If you talked to the other big 'van operation that I know of in TX the guy was probably full of it and would hire someone with those times in a second.

As for jobs that provide single pilot IFR time there aren't many if your below the 135 mins. Before I flew cargo I
Flight instructed for a year and a half
Flew SIC for a 135 op that flew vans for a few months
Flew aerial survey in 172's ALL over the country for about 6 months
Flew SIC in a Citation II for about 5 months.


Ferrying aircraft and aerial survey are two ways that I know of to get some single pilot IFR below 135 mins.

Also I just glanced at your blog and it looks like your down in AUS? I think a guy I wen't to college with is teachin at that flight school. It looks like I'll be down there a couple days a week starting next week hopefully...we'll have to grab some lunch.
Texasspilot is offline  
Old August 2nd, 2006, 20:33   #4
wheelsup
Old Skool
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: _
Posts: 5,494
Default Re: A Discussion with the Chief Pilot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coney
I recently took it upon myself to call the chief pilot of a certain freight company, which I'll not disclose (but they operate C-208s). In our discussion, the chief pilot explained that if he were to review a resume showing that an applicant has 3,000 TT with 2,500 hours of that being dual given, it would probably go to the bottom of the resume stack.

His rationale is that the applicant hasn't enough real world experience, which he considers to be single-pilot night IFR. So, I began to wonder what sort of jobs would provide such experience for a pilot.

If instructing isn't sufficient, what is?
this is a no brainer - I felt the last 6 months of my CFI'ing days (and 600 hours) were completely repetitive and would've left in a heartbeat had I not had a 12 month contract. The only good thing about working there was the money and the benefits.

that being said, take a look at *most* entry level 135 gigs and a lot of employees come from a CFI background. There's nothing wrong with CFI'ing - to a point.
__________________
"It takes just as much time to be nice to someone as it does to be a jerk."
wheelsup is offline  
Old August 2nd, 2006, 21:31   #5
Mr_Creepy
Old Skool
 
Mr_Creepy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In the O-zone
Posts: 5,810
Send a message via Yahoo to Mr_Creepy
Default Re: A Discussion with the Chief Pilot

Quote:
His rationale is that the applicant hasn't enough real world experience, which he considers to be single-pilot night IFR. So, I began to wonder what sort of jobs would provide such experience for a pilot.

If instructing isn't sufficient, what is?
I'd say his REAL rationale (notwhat hetold you) is that anyone who built that much time as a CFI is not a "lifer freight dog" and would most likely leave to go to the airlines.

When I was CP that was my PRIMARY attribute in interviewing (once I determined the person could fly) - "Will this guy leave us as soon as some regional airline waves a shiny jet under his nose?"
__________________
"You know you're winning an argument with a liberal when they start calling you names"

johntenney.com
The PEO Message
Myspace
My Business - PEO Pros
Mr_Creepy is offline  
Old August 4th, 2006, 17:28   #6
Coney
Junior Member
 
Coney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 3T5
Posts: 256
Default Re: A Discussion with the Chief Pilot

Okay. So, I'm on the right track. Whew!
__________________
J. Cone

My Blog
http://www.jeromecone.blogspot.com
Coney is offline  
Old August 5th, 2006, 01:51   #7
mccube5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 36
Send a message via AIM to mccube5
Default Re: A Discussion with the Chief Pilot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Creepy View Post
I'd say his REAL rationale (notwhat hetold you) is that anyone who built that much time as a CFI is not a "lifer freight dog" and would most likely leave to go to the airlines.

When I was CP that was my PRIMARY attribute in interviewing (once I determined the person could fly) - "Will this guy leave us as soon as some regional airline waves a shiny jet under his nose?"
I guess I have a hard time understanding that rationale since in order to meet the 135 mins (1200 TT etc.) you already meet the regional mins, heck you could have had a regional job 600 hours ago.

the way i see it is a guy applying at a 135 op is there cuz thats where his heart is, if he wanted to do the airline thing he would have since he has the time to go do that already.
mccube5 is offline  
Old August 5th, 2006, 08:59   #8
Mr_Creepy
Old Skool
 
Mr_Creepy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In the O-zone
Posts: 5,810
Send a message via Yahoo to Mr_Creepy
Default Re: A Discussion with the Chief Pilot

Quote:
Originally Posted by mccube5 View Post
I guess I have a hard time understanding that rationale since in order to meet the 135 mins (1200 TT etc.) you already meet the regional mins, heck you could have had a regional job 600 hours ago.

the way i see it is a guy applying at a 135 op is there cuz thats where his heart is, if he wanted to do the airline thing he would have since he has the time to go do that already.
There's many answers to that:

1) May not be any regionals hiring
2) Back in the day nobody wanted to work some regionals that had low mins
3) Some regionals want to see 135 time (or they did anyway)
4) Needs more time to be competitive (a lot of 1200 hr CFIs on the market)
5) etc.
__________________
"You know you're winning an argument with a liberal when they start calling you names"

johntenney.com
The PEO Message
Myspace
My Business - PEO Pros
Mr_Creepy is offline  
Old August 7th, 2006, 01:51   #9
azvandriver
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4
Default Re: A Discussion with the Chief Pilot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coney View Post
I recently took it upon myself to call the chief pilot of a certain freight company, which I'll not disclose (but they operate C-208s). In our discussion, the chief pilot explained that if he were to review a resume showing that an applicant has 3,000 TT with 2,500 hours of that being dual given, it would probably go to the bottom of the resume stack.

His rationale is that the applicant hasn't enough real world experience, which he considers to be single-pilot night IFR. So, I began to wonder what sort of jobs would provide such experience for a pilot.

If instructing isn't sufficient, what is?
Well, I guess that I am really lucky because I am flying C208 at 750 hours.(135vfr) Our flight school also has a 135 service that flys tours over the grand canyon and freight in the winter.

The funny thing is, the vast majority of insructors at our school never wanted to apply to the charter service. They all wanted to instruct to get 1000/100, then go to Mesa or some other crappy regional. I instructed to get 500 and then I was out of there.

Anyway, there is nothing wrong with dual given, just as long as you don't do it for 2500 hours when there are lots of real flying jobs out there.
azvandriver is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2008 jetcareers.com