![]() |
| | #1 |
| Newbie Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6
|
There seem to be a lot of people on this board considering both Pan Am and Westwind. Having been a student at both I think I can offer some insight to prospective students. There are currently about 15 former Pan Am people at Westwind but I am not aware of anyone leaving Westwind to go to Pan Am, this is largely due to cost I believe. Westwind is definitely cheaper. Pan Am costs a student about $14,000 more when you consider the ACE and route programs, but even if you take those out of the equation Pan Am will still be more expensive if you compare apples to apples. There have been a lot of negative posts on this board about the difficulty of the Pan Am stage checks and the fact that you are not guaranteed an instructor job when you are done. The fact that right seat direct students are guaranteed a job at Westwind and the prog checks are not as difficult as Pan Am's means that the level of instruction is not necessarily as high at Westwind. People say that Pan Am does not care about students, and that is partially true, they do not care if you wash out because they do not want an instructor who is not the absolute best possible pilot. If money is not an issue Pan Am will get you to an air line quicker and leave you slightly better prepared to succeed there once you get the job. But this comes at a cost of about $60,000 to $75,000 depending on the student. Westwind on the other hand will take you longer but will cost much less, most likely $40,000 or so. You will get training that is very good quality but not quite as good as Pan Am but you will do it in a much more relaxed and less political environment. |
| |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 2,987
|
I dont know why people are saying Pan Am's stage checks are so difficult. So far I have had 6 different stage checks, (3 for private, 3 for instrument, and I have one coming up next week for multi.) and I have not had any trouble with any of them. (knock on wood) And I have had a different check pilot for each one. I find that I prepare myself well, and I know what is expected of me. The check pilots are very fair, and they dont expect you to know everything, that is until your final stage check. And I usually learn something from the different check pilots, in the air, and on the ground. Which makes me a better pilot. The Turk. |
| |
| | #3 |
| Newbie Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6
|
Turkey, That is great that you have taken 6 stage checks and passed them all the first time. You must be a very good pilot. I can tell you that there is not a single person on the DVT campus that can say that. I for one do not think there is any thing wrong with busting a stage check every so often. I busted my first IR stage check entering a hold, and I have never made the same mistake again. |
| |
| | #4 |
| Newbie Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2
|
You say you are not aware of anyone leaving Westwind for Pan Am, I can tell you that I my self left Westwind for Pan Am and there are others. Pan Am is a better school. |
| |
| | #5 |
| Newbie Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2
|
How about failing a stage check at Pan Am because you did'nt give the check pilot a passenger briefing correctly...... There's another few hundred bucks....buy old Ford dealership Bob over there a new scuba tank. At Westwind you don't have to give them two weeks notice if you want to take a day off....or a doctor's excuse at that. All large flight school's are clearly a rip off.....just some ALOT more than others. That's just the way it is.....plus....you will get kicked out of Pan Am with barely a refund if you get "caught" flying a non-Pan Am owned aircraft. -Geesh |
| |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: FL
Posts: 922
|
[ QUOTE ] All large flight school's are clearly a rip off.....just some ALOT more than others. [/ QUOTE ] I beg to differ... |
| |
| | #7 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 81
|
You really get dropped if you take up planes other than panam's??? That's ridiculous!!
|
| |
| | #8 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 278
|
[ QUOTE ] You really get dropped if you take up planes other than panam's??? That's ridiculous!! [/ QUOTE ] Especially since when I did the tour I was told that it wasn't possible to rent a plane for fun i.e. if family or friends visit and you want to take them up. |
| |
| | #9 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 167
|
[ QUOTE ] You really get dropped if you take up planes other than panam's??? That's ridiculous!! [/ QUOTE ] No. If you want to fly in a non-PanAm plane, ask the chief for permission. They want to cover their a$$es and want your word that the aircraft is airworthy and safe. [ QUOTE ] Especially since when I did the tour I was told that it wasn't possible to rent a plane for fun i.e. if family or friends visit and you want to take them up. [/ QUOTE ] Not true. All you have to do rent a plane for fun is give the accountant money for the flight and have an assistant approve your destination, then you'll be scheduled a flight if there's an aircraft available. |
| |
| | #10 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 278
|
[ QUOTE ] Especially since when I did the tour I was told that it wasn't possible to rent a plane for fun i.e. if family or friends visit and you want to take them up. [/ QUOTE ] Not true. All you have to do rent a plane for fun is give the accountant money for the flight and have an assistant approve your destination, then you'll be scheduled a flight if there's an aircraft available. [/ QUOTE ] The marketing people should be more careful what they say then because that was a big minus in my book against PanAm. And all this time it was untrue - he was underselling his school in a sense. |
| |
| | #11 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 130
|
Can you rent a plane at another FBO? I have heard that you cannot. If this is true it is ridiculous, as a rated pilot you should be free to rent and go wherever you want without having to get an "approval".
|
| |
| | #12 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169
|
Go to a big academy and pay anywhere from 50,000-80,000 for your flight training, plus cost of living and loan expenses. Go to a smaller school pay 20 to 30,000 for your flight training, and get done a lot faster. Do the math; as Doug and many others on here have been trying to say for a long time -- it's just that simple. Save 20,000 to 40,000 dollars. |
| |
| | #13 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 148
|
And instruct at an FBO for 2-3 years building as many as 20 hours a month! Sounds great. Sign me up! There's good and bad to both sides.
|
| |
| | #14 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169
|
No, there is not a good and bad to both sides. That's the point I keep trying to hammer in. And build 20 hours a month at an FBO? Get real, maybe if you're in Nome, Alaska.
|
| |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: MD
Posts: 395
|
You guys are worried about $50k - $80k for your training? Are you talking about the whole thing? Have you seen college costs? You can't get out of many colleges without having forked over $130k. Even at the state colleges, you might still pay as much as $60k. You're saying that the most you'd EVER pay would be $80k? There are many people who wish that half their student loans were that low. |
| |
| | #16 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 148
|
[ QUOTE ] No, there is not a good and bad to both sides. [/ QUOTE ] Dude that is the most arrogant remark I have heard out of your pie hole yet. So let me get it right, Mav is right and everybody else is wrong. Get a clue. |
| |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 514
|
[ QUOTE ] And instruct at an FBO for 2-3 years building as many as 20 hours a month! Sounds great. Sign me up! There's good and bad to both sides. [/ QUOTE ] Depends on the FBO. |
| |
| | #18 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 148
|
My point is that not all fbo's are these great places where you get top rate instruction and then instruct to your heart's delight. Mavmb1 seems to only see that side of the coin. You're right, this might be the case at some fbo's but certainly not at all. As has been said many times on this website, some people do better with the academy setting and some people do better with the fbo approach. There isn't a wrong or a right way. That is unless you talk to Mav over at Sawyer, where according to him only the true pilots go to learn the only true way. |
| |
| | #19 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169
|
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No, there is not a good and bad to both sides. [/ QUOTE ] Dude that is the most arrogant remark I have heard out of your pie hole yet. So let me get it right, Mav is right and everybody else is wrong. Get a clue. [/ QUOTE ] Yep, that's right. I'm still trying to figure out why someone would spend an extra 40,000 dollars up front for their flight training when they don't have to; and taking all of your loan money up front is just the way the academies do business and not the best way to go about flight training. |
| |
| | #20 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: MD
Posts: 395
|
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No, there is not a good and bad to both sides. [/ QUOTE ] Dude that is the most arrogant remark I have heard out of your pie hole yet. So let me get it right, Mav is right and everybody else is wrong. Get a clue. [/ QUOTE ] Indeed. A lot of training may have to do with the environment, just to name one example. For instance, one person may thrive in a high pressure training environment (Air Force), another in a less pressured yet still structured one (large flight academy), and another in a more academic environment where s/he can also enjoy a broad array of academics (university). Congratulations to you if you feel you've chosen the best route. It might not be the best--even if it costs less--for everyone. |
| |
| | #21 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 148
|
Well DrBenny I appreciate your comments, unfortunately they go in one ear and right out the other for mav. Mav, I'll leave you to have your opinions, wrong or right. I'm not about to stoop to your level to make my point. It continues to amaze me that eventhough DrBenny aggrees as I'm sure others do to, you still believe any other way than your way is wrong. Pretty immature. Grow up.
|
| |
| | #22 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169
|
I know it sounds like I'm being arrogant, but seriously, why should anyone have to pay tens of thousands of extra for flight training at an academy? Can anyone answer that for me? Look at the prices the flight academies charge. We're talking about a lot of money here, not just nickels and dimes. So go ahead, give me a reason why someone should spend an extra 50,000 dollars or just revert back to calling me arrogant like always. |
| |
| | #23 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 514
|
Umm, extra $50,000??? What a load of crap. You guys quote around $35000 from zero to MEI. However, Saywer quotes FAA mins while Pan Am is a little more realistic. If I use Saywer's rates with the times that Pan Am recommends then your looking at more like $40,000. Ok, does Saywer's rates include tax? If not add another couple grand. So you'll pay a little more at Pan Am. However, you'll have around 100 hours of multi, and a better paying, higher quality of life job then an FBO instructor. Also, Pan Am will help you find a job is you take the ACE program. So it's not like Pan Am students are being ripped off, they are paying a little more, but there are benefits. BTW, you guys at Saywer should fix the errors on your website. |
| |
| | #24 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169
|
[ QUOTE ] Umm, extra $50,000??? What a load of crap. You guys quote around $35000 from zero to MEI. However, Saywer quotes FAA mins while Pan Am is a little more realistic. If I use Saywer's rates with the times that Pan Am recommends then your looking at more like $40,000. Ok, does Saywer's rates include tax? If not add another couple grand. So you'll pay a little more at Pan Am. However, you'll have around 100 hours of multi, and a better paying, higher quality of life job then an FBO instructor. Also, Pan Am will help you find a job is you take the ACE program. So it's not like Pan Am students are being ripped off, they are paying a little more, but there are benefits. BTW, you guys at Saywer should fix the errors on your website. [/ QUOTE ] How much is Pan Am paying you Tired? And at least we quote an accurate and honest amount on our website. 27,000 to 35,000 sounds accurate to me and it includes everything. Are you saying that Pan Am does that? Check the past posts in Pan Am jetcareers over the past year and see if that's true! And by the way Tired, you say you've met me before? How come you won't tell me who you are and won't reveal yourself? Talk about honesty! And how do you know how life is an instructor at an FBO is? I could go on with the rest of your post, but why waste much time on it? Remember, I'm the one speaking from experience. I've been at Pan Am and Sawyer. Have you ever been at Sawyer? Nope, you're just some idiot that feels brave behind a computer screen. Enough said. |
| |
| | #25 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169
|
And on one more note, this website is for helping people through flight training, and to speak honestly, I see NOTHING good with flight academies, and I've been taking a lot of heat for that viewpoint. That's fine if people argue with me but I'm speaking from experience. Remember, after ATA closed down, even Doug himself posted a warning on the website not to drop down 60,000 dollars upfront at any academy! Anyway like I said, enough said. If this stupid bickering continues, Doug is going to have to get out the jetcareers bat, close the thread, and send us all to hell. |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |