![]() |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 93
|
I was caught off guard when perusing CTFL350.com, as SAS is hiring FOs with well below my times. I've had my eye on them for quite a while since they're based in Tampa (my hometown), but they always required high minimums. I've got six months left here to finish my MBA, but it is VERY tempting to apply over there, though I know by the time I graduate the jobs will be gone I was wondering if anyone had inside info on them, mainly the schedules and bases (I know the main base is in Tampa, but their aircraft are all over the US). Thanks.-Brock |
| |
| | #2 | |||||
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: _
Posts: 5,504
|
I do not know the whole story on them, to be fair. I was called for a Challenger 604 SIC position after applying. Pay was to be upper TEENS (like $18k-$19k is what they told me 1.5 years ago, might've gone up a bit since). I hear CA pay is low to mid 30's. It's the "regionals" of the 135 world so to speak. Also I ended up doing some research on flameinfo. Lots of good stuff there if you wade thru the rumors. Here's some highlights: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Me? Even though I BADLY wanted to get back to central FL, I couldn't accept a position with a company like that. I was on my first week of ground school at a regional when they called and I elected to stay. I think I made a good choice. I heard from another one of their pilots who basically used them to get a type and move on. They have pretty heavy attrition. | |||||
| |
| | #3 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 93
|
Wheelsup, Thanks for the quick reply...I had the same thoughts. I'd love to stay in FL, but if all of that is true, it sounds pretty rough. It appears to be a pretty reputable place, I've seen their facilities and aircraft, but high teens is less than I'm getting now as a CFI. I was also wondering what kind of schedule they have, if they work you to the bone for that pay...I DO have a wife that I'd like to see on occasion Thanks for the quick info...I appreciate it. -Brock |
| |
| | #4 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: _
Posts: 5,504
| Quote:
Think of this like one of those 'what comes next' puzzles. Low Pay + Florida + Part 135 + Management Company + ______ = SAS A) Good Schedules B) OK Schedules C) Bad Schedules D) Schedules? What are those? My $$ goes with answer "D". I just can't see a company starting corporate FO's in a Challanger 604 at <$20k/yr as having good schedules. I'd bet you'd get at most 4 hard days off/month, if any. | |
| |
| | #5 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: DFW
Posts: 7,194
|
Brock, I'm from Tampa and several of my friends either currently fly or have flown for SAS. I had my resume in before I got on with American Eagle, but SAS wasn't hiring then. One of my former instructers is the head of training for them (or was). If you want to build time, get a type rating or two, then move on, it's a great company. However, the pay is low and it's feast or famine on the flying end. They either fly your butt off or you barely fly at all. I believe the starting pay is somewhere $25K but that might be for a King Air or Chieftain "Captain". For SIC, it's probably a lot less than that. As for the management over there, I've not heard great nor horrible things. Best of luck and keep us informed. Drop me a PM if you want my buddy's name. Stan
__________________ Quote:
| |
| |
| | #6 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #7 | ||
| Old Skool Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: DFW
Posts: 7,194
| Quote:
Truth be told, places like SAS use pilots like toilet paper because pilots will put up with it. If you don't think I'm living that reality myself in my "regionall la la land" you're kidding yourself, bro. I stand by my statement - if the original poster is looking for a place to build time, get a type rating or two, then move on to make more money, then SAS is a great place. I'll add - from personal knowledge - it is NOT a place to make a career!! Period. I make no apologies if that doesn't sit well is someone. It's simply the facts. Stan
__________________ Quote:
| ||
| |
| | #8 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
|
Oh I agree with you, it's probably a fine place to go get some time and a type. But at what expense? People should be telling places like SAS to shove their ~$30k Challenger CAPTAIN pay up their collective ass sideways. Otherwise they're going to drag others down to their level. And you getting on here and saying what a "great" place it is, is probably giving people who don't know any better the wrong idea. There is nothing great about taking a job at a place like that. But no, everyone wants to live in the god forsaken dump that is FL and get jobs that they're not qualified for, so hey, why not sell out the industry. |
| |
| | #9 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: _
Posts: 5,504
|
I have a dumb question, Mr. ESF. How is this company any different then AMF, where LR-35 FO's start at $26k and CA's start at $45k with small increases there after? Industry average in the 91 world would be around 60%-100% more than those figures. Pot meet kettle. And I believe the 604 CA pay is mid 40's from the limited knowledge I have of the company. Not that the 35 and 604 should even be classified as being the same pay rate though. Just an FYI, not to be taken as gospel!!! |
| |
| | #10 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
|
You're right. Thanks for the attitude adjustment, Mr. Regional Pilot. God knows you all are paid what you deserve. ![]() P.S.- I don't fly a Lear. |
| |
| | #11 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: _
Posts: 5,504
|
Not saying you do. But others at your company do. And in general they aren't doing anything different then the people at SAS are doing - building time to move to a better job. But I understand and agree where you are coming from, yet we must all start somewhere. I doubt one lone 135 company is controlling the salary of the corporate world. P.S. We are paid what we can negotiate. Unfortunately, we don't have much negotiating power at the moment!!! |
| |
| | #12 |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: GRR
Posts: 8,640
|
How about this thread not grow into any more of an insult fest, 'kay?
__________________ . If life gives you lemons, throw 'em into a quart of vodka. ~Red Green |
| |
| | #13 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: _
Posts: 5,504
|
he started it |
| |
| | #14 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: ??
Posts: 4,600
| Exactly. How can you negotiate better pay when management can point to some other company and say, "well, they get paid this, and people are banging down their doors to work there, so take it or leave it." (Gross oversimplification, of course, but you get the idea).
|
| |
| | #15 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: _
Posts: 5,504
| Quote:
Another example - from our MEC - when it comes time for our union to negotiate pay, the company also throws a copy of Mesa's contract on the table and says this is what you have to work with. It's frustrating, to say the least, but I am PROUD of the union for doing this. We have a pretty strong one IMO. I don't blame Skywest or Mesa pilots for this though. To place blame on them would be unwarrented and a waste of time and high blood pressure that could better be used for other activities. I encourage their contract talks and hope they can clean house come contract time, because we are guaranteed 2% in pay over the top 6 carriers. Mesa dropped my pay ~$1.00/hr (and that was just as a first year FO) last March. Hopefully they can up their pay so I can get a raise too !
| |
| |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 916
|
Besides the pay, the big red flag here is the possiblity of using unqualified FOs. Other places somehow get away with this, and it always comes back to bite someone. Usually places that do this don't pay any attention to duty times, weather minimums, fuel reserves, etc. Since the pay is so low, only losers that can't go anywhere else stay. One of them is probably the chief pilot. Just look at Grand Air in Toledo to see how this usually turns out. The sad thing is, over time they will not save money. Typing people who leave asap is not cheap. Lawn darting airplanes isn't either.
__________________ My observation is that those with an extreme knowledge deficit have a real hard time believing that anyone else knows something they don't. That's why the knowledge deficit never goes away. - tgrayson |
| |
| | #17 | ||
| Old Skool Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: DFW
Posts: 7,194
| Quote:
Why? There are tens of thousands of (and I don't mean to insult any age group here) young pilots who have never worked in the real world and think that $20K for flying right seat is like hitting the lottery. Those of us who have made a liveable wage in other professions, then took the quantum leap BACKWARDS financially - agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments. But, there's those tens of thousands of wannabe pilots out there who can and will work for basically nadda..... and employers know this and thus have all the leverage. If you want to lead the revolution, by all means, bro - get it rollin'. But don't be surprised and hurt if you're in a very, very small group. Just MHO. R2F
__________________ Quote:
| ||
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |