Jetcareers

Go Back   Jetcareers > Flight Training > CFI Corner

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 5th, 2009, 10:21   #1
Sidious
Senior Member
 
Sidious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Titusville
Posts: 675
Default Part 61 Changes

Does anyone have a guide to the part 61 changes? I read the FAA one but quite honestly they lost me with regards to instrument currency and the combination of AATD, SIM and airplane... Also I heard the student pilot cert is now good for as long as their medical...

Thanks
__________________
BajtheJino-go out and do some yanking and banking, pushing and pulling, rolling and floating. Its a plane. Get dirty with it.
Sidious is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2009, 12:45   #2
Bernoulli Fan
Junior Member
 
Bernoulli Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Malden, MA
Posts: 192
Default Re: Part 61 Changes

I just went through this and I have a few questions as well. Here is my take. Correct me if I'm wrong.

1. If you use an airplane to stay current, nothing has changed.

2. If you use an FTD/flight simulator to stay current, nothing has changed.

3. If you use an ATD to stay current, you are now only current for two months and you have to log 3.0 hours and accomplish 4 unusual attitude recoveries (2 nose-high, 2 nose-low) in addition to the usual requirements.

4. If you use a combination of all three, you don't have to log the 3.0 hours or do the unusual attitude recoveries. Log 6 approaches and a hold in the ATD and at least one approach and a hold in an airplane or FTD/flight simulator.

5. If you use a combination of the FTD/flight simulator, and an ATD, there is no benefit, as you would have to do six approaches and a hold in each. You might as well just stop after you do them in the FTD because you are current.

My only question is in the wording of 61.57(c)(4) regarding the 3-way combo. It says

"...in an aircraft and a flight simulator, flight training device, and aviation training device"

in the italic header, but then immediately says

"...combination of an aircraft, flight simulator or flight training device, and aviation training device"

Based on the intent of the reg (IMO), the second wording is correct and the first should be changed.
__________________
Pilot/ATC internal career path conflict.
Bernoulli Fan is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2009, 13:27   #3
Mike H
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver
Posts: 242
Default Re: Part 61 Changes

There's also the meaningless change in the definition of cross country from "at least" 50 nm to "more than" 50nm

Proposed changes also include removing the 10 hour complex airplane requirement for Commercial and substituting it with 10 hours "advanced" instrument training, but there are those on this board who believe that change won't happen for a couple of years, if it happens at all
__________________
TT: 450
M-E: 35
C.A.S.E.L.& C.A.M.E.L, Instrument Airplane
Mike H is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2009, 20:20   #4
KSCessnaDriver
Senior Member
 
KSCessnaDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: OJC/DAB
Posts: 600
Send a message via AIM to KSCessnaDriver
Default Re: Part 61 Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike H View Post
There's also the meaningless change in the definition of cross country from "at least" 50 nm to "more than" 50nm

Proposed changes also include removing the 10 hour complex airplane requirement for Commercial and substituting it with 10 hours "advanced" instrument training, but there are those on this board who believe that change won't happen for a couple of years, if it happens at all
The proposed changes are in an entirely different change proposition.

For what has officially changed, here is the link to the FAA document. http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-25133.pdf
__________________
KSCessnaDriver (Commercial SEL/MEL, Private SES, IA)


KSCessnaDriver is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 12th, 2009, 10:24   #5
Planedriver28
Newbie
 
Planedriver28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Independence
Posts: 22
Default Re: Part 61 Changes

Ok, here is one for you. I know this was brought up within the last few months, but it doesn't appear to have changed. In the 2009 FAR/AIM, in reference to advanced ground instructor privelages, an AGI can 'provide ground instruction for any certificate or rating'. (bear with me, I do not have the book here at work) I asked the FAA inspector that I did my CFI initial with in May about this, and he said that was not the 'FAA's intent', and that one must have an IGI cert. to provide ground instruction for an instrument rating, and that the FAR's will change this wording in the next revision. (2010). It was recently posted on here the changes that were forthcoming in the 2010 FAR/AIM. I purchased a 2010 FAR/AIM last weekend, and in 61, it STILL shows that an AGI can 'provide ground instruction for any certificate or rating.' It hasn't changed that I see. does anyone have the list of changes that was posted on here a few months ago?

Thanks!
Planedriver28 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 12th, 2009, 11:53   #6
PA44-LUV
Junior Member
 
PA44-LUV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 126
Default Re: Part 61 Changes

It just didn't make the publishing date for the hardcopy FAR/AIM's. Same thing happened last year with the change in medical certificate durations. If you check the regulation online at www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr , it's there.
__________________
I can haz airplane!
PA44-LUV is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 12th, 2009, 14:36   #7
Mike H
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver
Posts: 242
Default Re: Part 61 Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Planedriver28 View Post
Ok, here is one for you. I know this was brought up within the last few months, but it doesn't appear to have changed. In the 2009 FAR/AIM, in reference to advanced ground instructor privelages, an AGI can 'provide ground instruction for any certificate or rating'. (bear with me, I do not have the book here at work) I asked the FAA inspector that I did my CFI initial with in May about this, and he said that was not the 'FAA's intent', and that one must have an IGI cert. to provide ground instruction for an instrument rating, and that the FAR's will change this wording in the next revision. (2010). It was recently posted on here the changes that were forthcoming in the 2010 FAR/AIM. I purchased a 2010 FAR/AIM last weekend, and in 61, it STILL shows that an AGI can 'provide ground instruction for any certificate or rating.' It hasn't changed that I see. does anyone have the list of changes that was posted on here a few months ago?

Thanks!
On the FOI/AGI prep materials they make it clear that "any certificate or rating" means any certificate or rating except the instrument rating.
__________________
TT: 450
M-E: 35
C.A.S.E.L.& C.A.M.E.L, Instrument Airplane
Mike H is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2009 jetcareers.com