![]() |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Titusville
Posts: 448
| Question: Why would a public use airport not be charted on a low altitude enroute chart? Does that stop me from filing IFR if the airport isn't charted? Because although I can't find the reg I'm certain that you can file to an airport without an approach procedure as long as you can descend from the MEA and maintain your cloud clearances and basic VFR... Can anyone confirm that? Thoughts? And if anyone is wondering the airport its KCDK and the L chart is L-24. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,243
| You can file to a cow pasture, if you want, using lat/lon or rho theta fixes.
__________________ Core Concepts of Flight If an error is corrected whenever it is recognized as such, the path of error is the path of truth --Hans Reichenback |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 51
| Quote:
You do need to file an alternate if the destination airport has no IAP. (91.169b) You can also file an airport without an IAP as your alternate as long the forecast at your ETA allows you to get down from the MEA under basic VFR. Operating under something other than part 91, well, I have no idea. | |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,243
| Quote:
AIRPORTS All active airports with hard-surfaced runways of 3000' or longer are shown on FAA IFR Enroute Charts. All active airports with approved instrument approach procedures are also shown regardless of runway length or composition.
__________________ Core Concepts of Flight If an error is corrected whenever it is recognized as such, the path of error is the path of truth --Hans Reichenback | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Titusville
Posts: 448
| Quote:
But not NACO, thanks for the source tgrayson | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |