![]() |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: COS
Posts: 267
| What is the difference between descend via STARR1 arrival vs. cleared via STARR1 arrival? Descend via means you descend with the altitudes and cleared via means you fly the waypoints but maintain your current alt or whatever alt you were cleared to?
__________________ You can count on me to always be two beats behind every conversation! Superman owns a pair of B767 pajamas "Well, they built the 2006 Dodge Caravan to replace the 2005 and earlier Dodge Caravans, but they're still on the road..." - DT |
| |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 6,481
| My take? Descend via is how they would normally say it. If they said "cleared via", without mentioning descend, on an arrival that had mandatory crossing altitudes, I'd be sure to ask twice.
__________________ Click here to see how I became a UPS pilot http://www.jetcareers.com/content/view/65/132/ |
| |
| | #3 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: TN
Posts: 51
| Correct. "cleared via STARR1" is just part of of the ATC clearance in regards to your assigned routing. When ATC is ready for you to descend via the mandatory altitudes, they will state "descend via STARR1". The altitudes are not mandatory until you are cleared for them. |
| |
| | #4 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,235
| Quote:
Let's say you're going into LA, and for some reason they switch you from the SEAVU to the CIVET arrival--they'd say "cleared to LAX via the CIVET5 arival, maintain 360" (or whatever--they should give you an altitude to maintain). You're definately *not* cleared to descend until they give you a descent clearance--either "descend and maintain XXX" or "descend via the XXXXX arrival". If they just clear you via an arrival (not descend) and the arrival has crossing restrictions, you want to be on top of your descent planning in case they forget about you. | |
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 975
| Just out of curiosity - why is it that controllers on the west coast use the 'descend via' clearance and the controllers on the east coast don't? I've never had one on the right side but got them on every trip to the left side....just wondering if there was some underlying reason? Traffic congestion?? Jason
__________________ ...till we meet again on the high seas...ARRRRGGGGHHHHH |
| |
| | #6 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: TN
Posts: 51
| Quote:
From the 7110.65R (Controllers Manual) 2. A descend via clearance shall not be used where procedures contain published “expect” altitude restrictions. It's not just the West Coast. KIAD has the BARIN ONE arrival that uses "Descend Via". | |
| |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member | |
| |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 975
| Thanks for the info.....as much as I've been into EWR and especially IAD I've never had either one of those arrivals. Jason
__________________ ...till we meet again on the high seas...ARRRRGGGGHHHHH |
| |
| | #9 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: NC
Posts: 2,145
| Quote:
__________________ Listen To My Acoustic Demo@www.myspace.com/thesenachosaregood Watch Us Play Live@www.youtube.com/TheseNachosLive | |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |