Welcome to the Jetcareers.com !.

We are a online community of professional pilots, student pilots, dispatchers, air traffic controllers, flight surgeons and other folks with a high interest in the world of aviation.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   jetcareers > Ask A.... > Ask An Air Traffic Controller
Register FAQ Members ListUser Map The Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 4th, 2006, 00:46   #1
Senior Member
 
mhcasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 464
Default "With Request"

Hey guys/gals,

I'm working on my instrument rating and everytime I'm heading back into Austin I give approach the usual "C1234...C1234 go ahead...1234 172 location altitude inbound full stop with info X and request..."

My question...would it be alright to just go through everything and at the end throw in "...with info X request the ILS rwy 17L?" It's not really a whole lot more, though I guess it wouldn't really save anytime over the freq since they still have to establish radar contact and what not...

Your thoughts?
mhcasey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4th, 2006, 02:01   #2
Senior Member
 
PanJet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 545
Default Re: "With Request"

I'm not ATC, but I was taught that if ATC is busy and you're VFR, then you ask for "VFR request." That way they know you're VFR and they'll take you when they can. Otherwise, if they're not busy, just go ahead and ask for what you want. Saves time on the radio if they don't have to come back and say, "Cessna 1234 say request."
__________________
"Do you want to be a co-captain or a button pushing $@%#$ ??" -Friend

Commercial Pilot-ASEL, AMEL, IA
CFI, CFII, MEI
1,300 TT
Part 61 CFI and college student
Former aerial photography pilot
PanJet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4th, 2006, 05:32   #3
Moderator
 
SteveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: GRR
Posts: 8,104
Default Re: "With Request"

If you gave them an initial call and they have responded with "Cessna 1234, go ahead" or something similar, then go ahead and tell them everything that you want at the next transmission. All the standard stuff and whatever your request may be. You already have their attention so there is no need to waste more time and bandwidth to do a third transmission. It would break up the flow for them to be making notes on you, then have to pause, then come back to whatever your special request is. Do it in one shot.
__________________
.

It doesn't matter where you are, it doesn't matter where you go
If it's a million miles aways or just a mile up the road
Take it in, take it with you when you go. ~JBJ

Last edited by SteveC : August 4th, 2006 at 10:17.
SteveC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4th, 2006, 07:45   #4
Old Skool
 
jtrain609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 11,653
Send a message via ICQ to jtrain609 Send a message via AIM to jtrain609
Default Re: "With Request"

Quote:
Originally Posted by PanJet
I'm not ATC, but I was taught that if ATC is busy and you're VFR, then you ask for "VFR request." That way they know you're VFR and they'll take you when they can. Otherwise, if they're not busy, just go ahead and ask for what you want. Saves time on the radio if they don't have to come back and say, "Cessna 1234 say request."
Fair enough, but if you're IFR and you're just picking up a flight plan or checking in they know you're coming.
__________________
STFD
jtrain609 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4th, 2006, 12:35   #5
ATC
 
Fox Xray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 355
Default Re: "With Request"

It's purely a judgement call on the part of the pilot... if you come up on freq and things don't sound too busy you can add information. There is really no right or wrong way to do things, it really comes down to judgement on your part. Generally when we tell a VFR A/C go ahead after initial call up we are listening carefully because we often expect to get a fair amount of information and adding a request such as a rwy or specific approach only gives us a better picture of what your intentions are. Often we have to coordinate many requests with other sectors or facilities so the extra info does help.
Fox Xray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4th, 2006, 16:38   #6
Junior Member
 
willc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pensacola, Fl
Posts: 74
Talking Re: "With Request"

I'll put in my two cents on how the military does things since you are only as good as you sound on the radio and comm brevity is the goal.

VFR - "Mobile Approach, Buck 321 VFR 20 miles north of Mobile request"
"Buck 321, Radar contact 20 miles north of Mobile say request"
"Buck 321 request......"

IFR - "Mobile Approach, Buck 321, 16 thousand, information Golf, Request"
"Buck 321 go ahead with request"

If approach is not busy then just use judgement and add in "request ILS full stop" In our case they know who we are by our callsign and usually what we want so we can get away with throwing everything in on one call.
__________________
"These naval airmen, bold fellows, always on for an adventurous attack..." Sir Ian Hamilton
willc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 6th, 2006, 23:48   #7
Senior Member
 
mhcasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 464
Default Re: "With Request"

Well the verdict is out: at least in Austin, the controllers are pretty cool about just throwing it all in there at once.

As for the "VFR Request," I think it's probably redundant per reasons stated above.

I'm beginning to think conrollers are a lot more laid back than we give them credit for. Also, the female controller in Austin has a beautiful voice. Anybody know her?
mhcasey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 jetcareers.com