![]() |
| | #76 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Satellite Beach, FL
Posts: 40
| I choose ATP over my old FBO at Merritt Island because I did want to get through in 90 days. I know what the industry is like, in this industry you can't be scared by slowdowns in hiring, there will always be waves in the aviation industry. I will most likely go back and teach at my old FBO and be their primary multi instructor when I get back. I will also be working to help ferry some small twins for a friend who is very involved in aircraft sales. There are many outlets in the aviation world, I don't know if I will ever wind up working for an airline, but at least I will be qualified if I want to. ATP's firehose method fits my style, I always did better in college during the summer when I was taking enough classes to keep me totally swamped by school. I guess, to each his own though. |
| | |
| | #77 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: OC, CA
Posts: 39
| Don't get me wrong, I performed extremely well while attending ATP (finished ppl+90 day course in 120 days) but the reason for it is because I had a ton of help from mentors outside the program. It seemed as though instructors would find the guys that were able to keep up with the pace and left the guys who needed a little extra attention behind. It was sad to see my career partner bust 2 checkrides because of something the instructor could have spent a few more hours on. He eventually was given the boot even though his short comings were caused by the instructorS. I guess making sure we knew what order the DE would want to see the maneuvers in was a little more important. I never thought it was a good instructor/bad instructor issue. It was more the ill informed, lack of experience instructors that caused the issue. |
| | |
| | #78 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 158
| As I was going to attend ATP in March of this year I can say that I had weighted the pros/Cons of ATP Vs and FBO. But through all my analysis I can't understand why anyone would pay the money to go there NOW. In the current enviornment the cost justification seems crazy now (kinda was before the downturn too). |
| | |
| | #79 |
| Old Skool | So I wonder what has changed? 5 years ago it was VERY rare for a student to get booted out of the program. In the entire almost 2 years I was at ATP (between being a student and instructing) I think I saw maybe 3 guys get let go. And one of them was for drinking IN an airplane. Back then it was more common for the instructor to get kicked out then the problem student. Now it seems pretty common for people to be let go with some regularity. Has the tolerances ATP has gotten that much higher? Has the skills/maturity/dedication of the students gotten that much lower? Is the quality of instruction that much worse? Anybody? |
| | |
| | #80 |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2005 Location: Dirty Jerzey
Posts: 2,087
| Wow, 3 years since I went to ATP and the same arguments are being made! Awesome!! ![]() Trust me, get over a year experience at the Airlines and you'll forget all about ATP and their crappy program, then you'll realize the whole idea they paint in your head about the Airlines is a joke. And the agreements with airlines? Thats a marketing joke too. The quality of training you get at ATP is DIRECTLY related to your instructor. I got lucky and had GREAT instructors when I did the 10-month program. I felt like my instructors gave me some great ground and air instruction. A lot of people I know got stuck with CFI's who were lazy and never lifted a marker on the board. I agree with Bobbyduck, you can't blanket all of ATP instructors. I had good instructors and I tried to pass that on to my students as well. Looking back, the experience I had at ATP was preparation enough to fly a Beech 1900 in the Northeast, but my first job on the 1900 is where I REALLY learned to fly. Where you get your training is such a small part of your career. I'd opt for a really good instructor at a local school where the price is much cheaper. I used to advocate for ATP until I got some experience at the Airlines and realized that ATP was mostly just marketing hype. The multi time helped me get the first job, but I feel kind of stupid for not trying to get the stuff done cheaper. Now I'm getting furloughed and still have that loan from ATP. |
| | |
| | #81 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: stl
Posts: 380
| Quote:
The training is not hard, CFI school though you're on your own and I really do believe that the planets have to align for you to get your CFI ratings succesuly. There are so many things going against you, instructors, weather, timing, your will in the bumpy 120 degree heat, very limited time to get things done, and I think that's where people get pissed of the most at ATP and feel like they got ripped off. My example, I did really well the start of CFI school. My first flight on right seat went real good with the instructor and he even commented that I was one of the better guys he'd seen coming out of RAL location in quite some time....(summer of 07 guys didn't like RAL, something about santa clause examiners) Then we had to do the same thing with FRANK. But what happened was that my flight got scheduled for the afternoon and for some reason I didn't feel great that day but we had to go anyways. In the 120 degree bumpy air, even a seasoned instructor would probably had a hard time teaching let alone a guy who only had 2 hours of teaching from the right seat in a TWIN!!!! So I didn't get signed off by the GOD himself and that's where things got sour. Still say whatever you want about atp but I learned a lot from that place. Particularly that no-one but your self will help you get through a flight training program. I guarantee you those that ask a lot of questions and need hand holding through all the steps will not make it through an airline training event. Yea all the stuff ATP does is a lame recreation of airline procedures but it's surprisingly similar and it does prepare you for airline training. Also the 75 hours that you get to fly as PIC around the country will make you into a better pilot, guarantee, that's where I think I got my moneys worth out of ATP and got the confidence required to be a commercial pilot. It's expensive but I'd say ATP is still the best value out there. Last edited by fly8slep; July 19th, 2008 at 04:10. | |
| | |
| | #82 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Newnan
Posts: 200
| Who wants to hear the story of an ATP grad from 1997? It ends with a job a SouthernJets.
__________________ SouthernJets 767 copilot ATL bred and based |
| | |
| | #83 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Birmingham
Posts: 15
| I think one thing people need to look at with ATP, is first like most people say, it depends on the instructor. My time at ATP as both a student and instructor were descent. If you have a great instructor (Swank'nassious) to help you out you can do very well. If you don't, find one and talk to them. The good instructors are always willing to help out a student. Also, instructors are FORCED to work for more than they should at ATP. Students need to understand that some of their instructors would love to help them out more, but are so beaten down by the machine that is ATP, they can only do enough to keep the company off their back. For students, put in the work that is required and you'll do well. While I was an instructor, some students thought ATP was a big party and did not put in the work required to get that many ratings in such a short time span. The students who worked hard did well in the course, the ones who didn't did not. ATP is what you make it. Yeah, it is not for everyone, but it can be a descent place to go to. I left ATP to fly cargo and have done very well in all the training and on the line. I have not felt deficient in one area. |
| | |
| | #84 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 67
| All I'm thinking about now is that it sounded great a year ago, you could "race to the bottom" in less than a year. But now, seems like furloughed RJ pilots with 121 experience will beat out newbies for awhile to come. The "fast track" seems more like a 2 to 3 year deal rather than 7 to 12 months. I was impressed with what I saw on my tour at ATP but I think I'll sleep on it awhile longer at this point. |
| | |
| | #85 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Birmingham
Posts: 15
| Yeah, ATP's whole marketing strategy is "get there first!", well, that is not gonna work anymore because no one is getting hired. People should use the downturn to take their time, work on the ratings at their pace, and make the best out of the downturn. |
| | |
| | #86 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Anchorage
Posts: 673
| Quote:
__________________ 15"MP 2400RPM Flaps - 30 degrees Sink Rate - Pegged Airspeed - 80kts Fully knowing why they call it the lead sled - Priceless. | |
| | |
| | #87 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
| Quote:
some people need to man up ... atp is great and cfi school is a cakewalk went through whole program in 90 days exactly spent exactly 2 weeks at cfi in vegas... mei on monday cfi single on thursday and cfii on saturday.. busy week but all you gotta do is study and its soooo easy dont bash on a flight school when you dont know how to work hard simple as that ive seen way too many people come through here and "opt out" because they are scared of cfi school... one thing to say is grow a pair l8 | |
| | |
| | #88 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2005 Location: Dirty Jerzey
Posts: 2,087
| Quote:
Gotta love Mr. Internet Tough guy. So tell us...what experience do you have? Other than the ink still wet? | |
| | |
| | #89 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: NJ
Posts: 527
| The way I see it 95% of the users on this board have their ink wet. There's very little difference between all of us, in my opinion. Different people have different learning styles. Atp is probably great for some and perilous for others. |
| | |
| | #90 |
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
| |
| | |
| | #91 | |
| Agent Smith | Quote:
This is coming from a webmaster that went to ERAU, wouldn't go back but figures it's probably good for some people, but not for others. More than one way to skin a cat.
__________________ Doug Taylor http://76school.flyblog.com (old!) http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28) | |
| | |
| | #92 |
| Old Skool | I'm never coming to this website again. |
| | |
| | #93 |
| Old Skool | Yeah agree totally Dave..... I think many on this forum have been to ATP and have experienced many things..... Those whom opt out are probably the ones who just cant cram what takes a year to learn in 1 week of CFI ground... just a wild thought. |
| | |
| | #94 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 46
| I agree with Meyers CFI school at ATP is really a joke, and this coming from someone who went to ATP and finished in 90 days without a bust. CFI school is more like a CFI study session, but that being said I kinda feel sorry for all of the people that opted out of CFI. It's hard enough to get a job right now with your CFI let alone without. |
| | |
| | #95 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: May 2005 Location: Dirty Jerzey
Posts: 2,087
| Quote:
![]() My point is that "macho" attitudes, while somewhat common in this field, are absurd. Just because you were able to succeed through ATP's program (like myself and many others), doesn't mean that everyone can have the information shoved down their throat in such a short time frame and be successful. This doesn't mean they need to "grow a pair", it just means that maybe they actually need instruction, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. I think ATP's program was good in the sense that it fit my desire to learn aviation, I was able to fly well maintained aircraft and they were all multi engine. The price was a huge selling point for me when I went there because you couldn't get all the ratings in a single for that price in my hometown. Putting down people and telling them to "grow a pair" when it comes to learning aviation is not a healthy nor mature approach. I certainly hope you aren't telling your students that if they aren't doing the VMC demo properly in 4hrs of stick time that they need to "grow a pair". Rich T. is good guy and he's an awesome pilot, but his approach to students, customers is wrong. ATP is not the best school and they provide nothing better or worse than any other school. Rich likes to run his place in Jax like its some sort of privelaged military academy. Well, the military doesn't scream and yell at people in airplanes, especially when they are learning how to fly. Don't let Rich convince you that Aviation is some elite corner of the universe fit for only those who can solo in 8hrs and get all 3 CFI ratings in less than 2 weeks. I know Rich. He was my instructor for my PPL and he pushed me to solo at 10hrs. He creates an unhealthy environment in an airplane with people just learning to fly, and your "grow a pair" attitude is a classic example of a Rich T. influenced ATP instructor. When you get to the Airlines, you need to drop whatever attitude ATP plants in your head. With passengers sitting behind you, there is no place in the professional cockpit for a macho attitude. I don't care how good of a pilot you think you are coming out of ATP because you got all your ratings in 90 days, you will make mistakes and the first time that Turbine aircraft hands you your ass on a golden plate, you'll be damn thankful if your Captain just smiles and says "My controls". Believe me, it WILL happen and more than once. | |
| | |
| | #96 |
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
| lol ya i did have a little bit of a macho attitude i guess i dont think im good or privileged or anything i just hate seeing people whine constantly about something that really isnt as bad as they make it seem especially when they havent even been there or tried it how would they even know..... and dont think i pass this on to my students lol i dont talk like that but i do try to convince them that as long as they apply themselves they will do fine... as for the rich t comment thats hilarious and so true ahha |
| | |
| | #97 |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: GRR
Posts: 8,486
|
__________________ . If life gives you lemons, throw 'em into a quart of vodka. ~Red Green |
| | |
| | #98 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
| Quote: im not even gonna dignify that with a response | |
| | |
| | #99 |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: GRR
Posts: 8,486
| Ah, but you just did! Irony alert! ![]()
__________________ . If life gives you lemons, throw 'em into a quart of vodka. ~Red Green |
| | |
| | #100 |
| Junior Member | [quote=Airdale;925744] When you get to the Airlines.... [/quote] One of my bigest perks about ATP is that most everyone who came out of their program cant really see anything except the airlines. I just read a statistic that GA carries more passengers then all the airlines combined every day. Yet ATP and JC seems to think Airlines is what flying is all about. And oh my goodness I don't know how many times I hear from these pilots "when you get to the airlines you will really learn how to fly" My co worker has 7000 hours in the bush flying the small planes, and it was funny to hear a 1000 hour airline pilot asking this guy when hes going to get a "real job", and then he freaked out when he heard we was going into hard IMC in a Cessna with no auto pilot!!.
__________________ CFI-I-MEI |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |