![]() |
| | #26 |
| Old Skool | |
| |
| | #27 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: JAX
Posts: 154
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #28 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 134
| No, Pfly is correct. Until late last year, ACPP grads got a jet ride. Basically an hour in a CJ and a high altitude sign off. Big deal. Now ATP raised the fee and grads get the CRJ transition course. I was one of the first in the program to get it. About half of the people I was in the program with had the jet ride, the other had the course. Those who had the jet ride said it was fun but essentially worthless. The course, as I say, is worthwhile. On the above debate, which indeed has been passed around JC for a long time, I have to weigh in on Bob's side, though I admit I know nothing about nothing. It just seems to me that in a modern glass cockpit of a regional jet stick-and-rudder skills don't matter as much as CRM and systems management proficiency. After all, you only fly the first 600 feet and the last 200, right . . . ? Kind of sad in a way, but I'm beginning to think its true. One instructor (an RJ FO) called himself a "flight systems manager, not a pilot." |
| |
| | #29 | ||
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 91
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| |
| | #30 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #31 | ||
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 134
| Quote:
I don't know who "ES" is. I trained in RIC not JAX. I was given a choice to check with two DEs for my CAX single and CFI single. The rubber-stamp was passing guys on a combined ride that took about twenty minutes total. No lie. (The oral was five minutes and they flew once around the pattern and did some "maneuvers".) I went with the other guy and busted because he wanted the chandelle flown per PTS at minimum controllable airspeed, i.e., to the horn. I did them the way I was taught, which was about 10 kts faster. So, I busted. He waived the recheck fee, I think because he was mad at ATP (long story), but I paid him $100 anyway and was happy to. Why? Because he taught me the right way to do a chandelle. If you go to a rubber stamp, your ticket feels cheap, imho. Quote:
| ||
| |
| | #32 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
But fuel pumps are kind of obvious as well ... live and learn though i guess! | |
| |
| | #33 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 134
| Quote:
Not that I'm making excuses . . . ![]() | |
| |
| | #34 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Somewhere in FL
Posts: 360
| To each their own. When I did my interview with ASA, there were a bunch of guys that did the CRJ sim transition course. Several of them busted on the sim ride. Me and the other guy that passed were (relatively) high time CFIs with G1000 experience. We got paid to build our glass time, and we passed while the other guys didn't. Sure would've sucked to pay all that money and bust - particular for the ones that didn't even have a CFI rating! |
| |
| | #35 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Somewhere in FL
Posts: 360
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #36 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Somewhere in FL
Posts: 360
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #37 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 30
| Dont have time to elaborate now, cause im in the x country phase. Management at my location are dimwits, who dont communicate with the dpe's enough. I'm doing good compared to many but I dont like how people are treated or how the place is run. Dispatchers are complete jerks. The planes are maintained pretty well though. 0/12 people failed their CFI intitial during the lastest 2 classes in Las Vegas. Not good odds, I dont care who you are. And ATP is completely inflexible and want you to rush rush. Dont let em discontinue ur checkride if you need to. Fake a stomachache, whatever it takes. I think the 10 month is a better route 4-5 months is plenty fast. Laters |
| |
| | #38 |
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 25
| Some really great discussion here guys. For me, it's really important for me that I get a quality education. There are several routes for me to go through, especially locally. I can fly at a small FBO in Palo Alto, the FBO at Reid Hillview, or with the SJSU flying club at KSJC. Plenty of options here in the SF Bay Area. However. There are some aspects of ATP that just sound WAY too enticing to not seriously consider. I will say this though... This forum has already led me to decided not to do my PPL with ATP. The SJSU flying club is just WAY too cheap at $52/hr wet hobbes on a C152 and $25/hr for instructor. Problem is... they only have C152s and C172s. How am I ever going to get multi time? Simple, I'm not. So that's not an option for all of my ratings. Now the local FBOs are an option, but I haven't gone out there yet to check up on what their instructors, fleet, and maintenance programs are like. I still have to get out of the community college and into SJSU before I can even consider starting flight training again. It's all enough to make me insane right now. It's easy to spend imaginery money on a hypathetical scenario at this point, and even easier to imagine that I'd be able to pay off a $70k loan without a hitch. Right now Microsoft Flight Simulator is expensive enough for me. Who charges $60 for a piece of software that hardly works on a very strong computer? Haha. Now we're talking about something that is REALLY important. Lol. Chris |
| |
| | #39 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 134
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #40 |
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 25
| What is this integrated training you speak of? |
| |
| | #41 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Miami
Posts: 268
| Ahh Pink Slip Pinkston, I know him well. Funny how it seams the easier the D.E, the better the chance you will fail yourself on something very stupid... |
| |
| | #42 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 134
| |
| |
| | #43 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 134
| |
| |
| | #44 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,059
| Quote:
If he's getting a PPL, he doesn't have the option - he has to learn this. I'm just confused because you said "Integrated Training" as if this was something he could shop for. He can't. Did I mis-read you?
__________________ "The first rule of Flight Club is you do not talk about Flight Club." | |
| |
| | #45 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #46 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Miami
Posts: 268
| Why on earth would you want to do any time building OUTSIDE of atp? ATP's rate of 93$ an hour WITH an instructor doing ALL IFR X/C time building, you would be stupid to do it elsewhere for more money and most likely not under IFR. I received a VERY nice 30 hour intro to IFR flight before I ever started the ACPP. It made the instrument portion that much easier! |
| |
| | #47 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 25
| Quote:
Let me see if I understand this correctly. So after I get my PPL here, I'll have to do MORE flying for time building before I could start the ACPP at ATP? | |
| |
| | #48 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,059
| Correct. You have to time-build to 85 hours, I believe.
__________________ "The first rule of Flight Club is you do not talk about Flight Club." |
| |
| | #49 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 134
| |
| |
| | #50 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
Getting used to looking at the PFD/MFD is kind of a no brainer. i had no problem feeling comfortable with after doing my initial instrument training with steam gauges.
__________________ Commercial Pilot, CE-500 Gold Seal CFI.II.MEI IGI Future GoJet Pilot. | |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |