![]() | |
| | #26 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
PSA's recall train is a very slow moving one (think steam engine), compared to TSA which is a bullet train and Eagle's which is your standard Amtrak variant.
__________________ DoD WxFcstr.AGI.MEI.CFI.CFII.FO.CRJ2.Furloughed | The TRoP | ALPA | APSA | ACLU | IVAW | AMS | Acey 80| | |
| |
| | #27 |
| Old Skool |
Congrats TSA folks!
__________________ Hey Imperial Fleet, get read to suck some DAK! |
| |
| | #28 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: D-Town
Posts: 107
|
Well, I certainly don't blame you for WANTING to go, but you should crunch the numbers, and also look at where you are seniority wise at each place. If I don't see you around Lakes anymore, I'll hope you are in a better place. MEOW!
__________________ Good talk... See ya out there |
| |
| | #29 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: ATL
Posts: 2,981
|
Congrats TSA folks. 130+ recalls is alot of pilots. Must be something Mesa-UA termination or RFP related. I'm sure we'll here an announcement soon.
__________________ Comm-ASEL, MEL, Inst. CFI, CFII, MEI TT: 1300 CRJ700/900 FO B.S. Aviation Management-Business Minor Southeastern Oklahoma State University Cum Laude Graduate |
| |
| | #30 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 58
|
someone remind me what RFP is would ya?
|
| |
| | #31 |
| Old Skool |
__________________ All of my posts are edited by my staff. |
| |
| | #32 |
| Newbie Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1
|
Any idea how long the classes would be? A birdie told me the ground portion would be a week and 4 sim sessions. Being out of the airplane for 14 months and only 2 weeks of training? Za?
__________________ |
| |
| | #33 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: here and there
Posts: 673
|
The shorter the better, the objective is to stay as little as possible in St Louis!!!!. As long as they give us the memory items before as well as the limitations/flows it would be fine. I dusted off my ERJ stuff this weekend I couldn't believe how much of the stuff I remembered. As long as they give us 2 or 3 weeks time before class I think it would be fine.
|
| |
| | #34 |
| Old Skool | If you're gone for over 12 months you have to go through requal C, which is entire course over again IFRC.
__________________ Yet Another Freight Puppy* |
| |
| | #35 |
| Old Skool |
Believe it or not, this stuff comes back really FAST. Sounds like you will be fine with what the company has given you!
|
| |
| | #36 |
| Old Skool |
So any word yet on what these recalls are about? Strange to recall with no announcement was my first thought. Along the lines of meyer's comments, do we need to maintain anything (besides a medical) during furlough? Can we just show up without an actual IPC or BFR, complete training and be legal?
__________________ All of my posts are edited by my staff. |
| |
| | #37 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,248
| Yeah I'd think so. I'd say all you need is a couple hours in the sim and you would be golden after that.
__________________ I'm fine with pilots being allowed naps in cockpits, as long as we get to wear pajamas. End 16 hour duty days. |
| |
| | #39 |
| Old Skool |
I'm too lazy to type out the FAA's url. Is this full requal part of a reg? Knowing that as a certainty would help me for planning purposes. I'm pretty sure a recall for me is going to be happening within a few months or less.
__________________ Hey Imperial Fleet, get read to suck some DAK! |
| |
| | #40 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: KC
Posts: 179
|
From what I understand, if you were out more than a year, you'd be going through a somewhat condensed version of initial new hire training followed by around 5 sim sessions and IOE. 48722, 48501, 42549, 39462...Heard them once recently and they're still stuck up in the noggin somewhere. It'll all come back.
__________________ Furloughed Waterskier Beech 1900 FO |
| |
| | #41 |
| Old Skool |
I had to remember that AND 50044 49823 43651 40564 46495 46275 41226 37698 46738 46517 41226 37698 44312 44092 40785 35274. Good ole Cheezytaco.
__________________ Hey Imperial Fleet, get read to suck some DAK! |
| |
| | #42 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 77
|
Congrats to all who go back.
|
| |
| | #43 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: here and there
Posts: 673
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #44 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: here and there
Posts: 673
|
More than a week now past the recall letters, more than 7 days now past our limit to respond to the recall, why am I not surprised with this company? The least they could do is update us.
|
| |
| | #46 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: KC
Posts: 179
|
Was just told by a union rep that TSA did not get the flying. As you were everybody.
__________________ Furloughed Waterskier Beech 1900 FO |
| |
| | #48 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: KC
Posts: 179
|
From: Rick Leach Date: November 13, 2009 RE: United RFP We were notified today that we were unsuccessful in our effort to secure flying under the recent United Airlines RFP. This disappointing outcome was despite providing United a low cost, highly competitive bid. The costs required by United as well as some of the flexibility on the length of the agreement would have provided substantial risk to Trans States. As I have said many times in the past, we are looking for opportunities to grow, but only where such growth would be beneficial to the company. In this case, we could not agree to the terms United required and realize sufficient levels of value to our company. United did say that we offered a very competitive proposal which allowed us to be one of the final two out of nine initial bidders for this RFP. They also indicated that our high quality service and our low costs , coupled with the value we continue to bring to the partnership, make this a very difficult decision. They reconfirmed their commitment to our partnership and the value we continue to bring them now and in the years to come, both on our current flying as well as any future opportunities which may arise. Unfortunately, this decision will result in us rescinding the recent furlough recall we initiated last week. We regret that we will be unable to follow-through with our recalls at this time. Because of the delivery schedule required by United and the notification requirements of our ALPA agreement, we had no choice but to send the recall notices while still waiting for final word from United. If we could have waited until final word was given before issuing the recalls, we would have. Unfortunately, timing did not allow that to be our course of action. We notified ALPA leadership of our intent from the very beginning of the recall process and thank them for their cooperation and understanding during this time. We sincerely apologize for any disruption this may have caused to our furloughed pilots. I know this is a major disappointment to many of our employees and again I am disappointed we were unable to bring this process to a winning conclusion. Please rest assured we will continue to work towards finding ways to profitably grow Trans States Airlines as well as return our furloughed pilots to work as soon as possible. Thank you for your continued support and I will keep you posted on further opportunities as they develop.
__________________ Furloughed Waterskier Beech 1900 FO |
| |
| | #49 |
| Old Skool |
Wow... Recalls one day and revoked a week later.
|
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |