Jetcareers

Go Back   Jetcareers > Career Specific > Airline Pilots

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:25   #1
gtpilot
Senior Member
 
gtpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 586
Default Skywest to fly for Airtran

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/SkyWes....html?x=0&.v=1

Wow, just wow!
gtpilot is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:26   #2
Monty
Junior Member
 
Monty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 292
Default Airtan and SkyWest team up

http://pressroom.airtran.com/phoenix...983&highlight=



Interesting agreement. Sounds more like a branded operation to me.
__________________
Monty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:27   #3
Monty
Junior Member
 
Monty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 292
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Ha! I think we posted at the same time on that one.
__________________
Monty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:29   #4
MQAAord
Moderatorette
 
MQAAord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Looney Bin
Posts: 12,229
Send a message via AIM to MQAAord Send a message via MSN to MQAAord
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Threads merged.
__________________
PPL SEL 100-ish TT
Fmr AA F/A (12 months)
Fmr Simmons/AE F/A (6 years)
Fmr AE ground school instructor (1 year)
Fmr AE IOE instructor (3 years)


Vice President - Air Hostess Training: JC's own


MQAAord is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:37   #5
gtpilot
Senior Member
 
gtpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 586
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty View Post
Ha! I think we posted at the same time on that one.
I just barely scooped ya!
gtpilot is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:37   #6
cencal83406
Old Skool
 
cencal83406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,757
Send a message via AIM to cencal83406
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

So it's not a true regional feed. It's more like the "alliance" thing or "code share".... passengers will know they're getting on Skywest (not "AirTran operated by Skywest")....

or at least that's how I read it.
__________________
cencal83406 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:39   #7
kellwolf
Old Skool
 
kellwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 16,977
Send a message via AIM to kellwolf
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Didn't ACA fly for AirTran back in the day?
__________________
"I'm The Doctor, by the way. Run for your life!"
kellwolf is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:41   #8
CRJDriver
Old Skool
 
CRJDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KBOI
Posts: 2,183
Send a message via AIM to CRJDriver
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by kellwolf View Post
Didn't ACA fly for AirTran back in the day?
AWAC did. Didn't last very long as far as I remember....

This will be different. From the press release...

Seats on these flights will be sold in conjunction with AirTran Airways flights with revenue shared on a pro-rated basis.

SkyWest Airlines will operate five SkyWest branded, 50-seat, Bombardier CRJ200 regional aircraft to and from Milwaukee.
CRJDriver is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:43   #9
jynxyjoe
Old Skool
 
jynxyjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 3,630
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Anyone else feel like Skywest and Republic are about to have a banner year.
__________________
I'm fine with pilots being allowed naps in cockpits, as long as we get to wear pajamas.

End 16 hour duty days.
jynxyjoe is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:45   #10
Firebird2XC
Old Skool
 
Firebird2XC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: *ATTENDING NetworkJC '09
Posts: 4,366
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Cue Todd in 5.....4.....3.....2.....1...
Firebird2XC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:46   #11
kellwolf
Old Skool
 
kellwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 16,977
Send a message via AIM to kellwolf
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Sounds like a creative way to use those -200s that were doing the Midwest flying. I have to say, good move my Skywest management.
__________________
"I'm The Doctor, by the way. Run for your life!"
kellwolf is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:46   #12
OldTownPilot
Old Skool
 
OldTownPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bang'er and Bah Habah
Posts: 4,206
Blog Entries: 10
Send a message via AIM to OldTownPilot
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

How long ago did the MKE base close from the Midwest fling that they did?
__________________
As a wise man said, sumb!tch flew in, sumb!tch'll fly out.

Ski Hard. Party Harder.
OldTownPilot is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:47   #13
jynxyjoe
Old Skool
 
jynxyjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 3,630
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldTownPilot View Post
How long ago did the MKE base close from the Midwest fling that they did?
I thought they did close it already.
__________________
I'm fine with pilots being allowed naps in cockpits, as long as we get to wear pajamas.

End 16 hour duty days.
jynxyjoe is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 13:56   #14
OldTownPilot
Old Skool
 
OldTownPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bang'er and Bah Habah
Posts: 4,206
Blog Entries: 10
Send a message via AIM to OldTownPilot
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Yeah thats what I figured. Thats a lot of displacement and then new base moving expenses. A bunch of FAs probably just quit rather than go to ORD, granted given the economy, most probably just went to ORD.
__________________
As a wise man said, sumb!tch flew in, sumb!tch'll fly out.

Ski Hard. Party Harder.
OldTownPilot is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:01   #15
jynxyjoe
Old Skool
 
jynxyjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 3,630
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldTownPilot View Post
Yeah thats what I figured. Thats a lot of displacement and then new base moving expenses. A bunch of FAs probably just quit rather than go to ORD, granted given the economy, most probably just went to ORD.
A buddy's girlfriend is an FO in ORD now, was MKE. I believe she said it was because of the base closing. Honestly though, I didn't listen a whole hell of a lot.
__________________
I'm fine with pilots being allowed naps in cockpits, as long as we get to wear pajamas.

End 16 hour duty days.
jynxyjoe is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:05   #16
wheelsup
Old Skool
 
wheelsup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: _
Posts: 7,398
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by jynxyjoe View Post
Anyone else feel like Skywest and Republic are about to have a banner year.
I think they are doing it out of desperation. Personally. They have leases to pay on the jets and this is just a way to do that.

Republic did the same, look at the HI operation as well as buying up Frontier and Midwest. As did Mesa and Expressjet, and ACA. Branded operations really don't do so well especially with RJ's.

If anyone can do it however, Skywest can. They have a good product and a great leadership team.
__________________
"It takes just as much time to be nice to someone as it does to be a jerk."

Last edited by wheelsup; November 4th, 2009 at 14:07.
wheelsup is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:17   #17
Baronman
Old Skool
 
Baronman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NEWARK
Posts: 1,556
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Skywest has planes and having the planes operate "at risk" will still bring in some money...At worst Skywest loses some money, at best they make some but at least they don't have airplanes sitting around which they have to make lease payments on.

I think it's the best deal for AirTran....Airtran comes out on top.

Not great for Midwest...Just steeper competition and more seats in an already over-served market.
__________________
"I got a FEVER, and the only perscription is more Cow-Bell!"
Baronman is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:18   #18
E_Dawg
Moderator
 
E_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 5,210
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

I seriously wonder if it's possible at all now that we've seen a great group like ExpressJet have a go at it and STILL fall short. To me it seems Skywest will lose less $$ flying these things for Air Tran, than they would if the ex-Midwest planes were just parked somewhere collecting desert dust.
E_Dawg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:20   #19
jynxyjoe
Old Skool
 
jynxyjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 3,630
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baronman View Post
Skywest has planes and having the planes operate "at risk" will still bring in some money...At worst Skywest loses some money, at best they make some but at least they don't have airplanes sitting around which they have to make lease payments on.
If the planes are sitting around the company isn't paying for the gas being burned, per diem for the pilots, paying the luggage guy to drive the missconnect bags, meal vouchers for late flights, MX for use.

I just remember the at risk stuff falling apart at Colgan is all.
__________________
I'm fine with pilots being allowed naps in cockpits, as long as we get to wear pajamas.

End 16 hour duty days.
jynxyjoe is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:32   #20
joliet
Senior Member
 
joliet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: G
Posts: 373
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Way to go Airtran

the 717 isn't much bigger than a CRJ

go go go air tran


bye bye mainline jobs
joliet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:36   #21
Socal321
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: here and there
Posts: 563
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelsup View Post
I think they are doing it out of desperation. Personally. They have leases to pay on the jets and this is just a way to do that.

Republic did the same, look at the HI operation as well as buying up Frontier and Midwest. As did Mesa and Expressjet, and ACA. Branded operations really don't do so well especially with RJ's.

If anyone can do it however, Skywest can. They have a good product and a great leadership team.
Yes there's nothing special about this other than Skywest has enough cash to keep it going. Let's all hope this thing fails. It sets a bad precedent and mainline code shares with regionals is a very dangerous thing for scope. It wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't a code share.
Socal321 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:40   #22
stuckingfk
Old Skool
 
stuckingfk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: El Forko Grande
Posts: 2,800
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by Socal321 View Post
Yes there's nothing special about this other than Skywest has enough cash to keep it going. Let's all hope this thing fails. It sets a bad precedent and mainline code shares with regionals is a very dangerous thing for scope. It wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't a code share.
Or if you want to look at the positives for AirTran.

They create a market with a smaller plane at less risk to their bottom line. They create more demand for their product and maybe send Midwest to the crapper. People of this board seem to think that if you can fly an RJ into an airport that means you can somehow fill a 737, 717, 320, etc.

If these flights work, eventually they'll be able to send 717's on these routes.

Has anyone taken business classes here?
stuckingfk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:41   #23
Baronman
Old Skool
 
Baronman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NEWARK
Posts: 1,556
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by jynxyjoe View Post
If the planes are sitting around the company isn't paying for the gas being burned, per diem for the pilots, paying the luggage guy to drive the missconnect bags, meal vouchers for late flights, MX for use.

I just remember the at risk stuff falling apart at Colgan is all.
True....I guess if they're somewhat successful it's not too bad, but if it's the planes are empty and or low yields then they burn a lot of money.
__________________
"I got a FEVER, and the only perscription is more Cow-Bell!"
Baronman is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:42   #24
falconvalley
Old Skool
 
falconvalley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: KMKE
Posts: 2,822
Send a message via AIM to falconvalley
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by Socal321 View Post
Yes there's nothing special about this other than Skywest has enough cash to keep it going. Let's all hope this thing fails. It sets a bad precedent and mainline code shares with regionals is a very dangerous thing for scope. It wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't a code share.
Just wait! In about 30 years it'll probably be almost all "regional" flying here in the US. Sad thing is we can't stop that. We don't run the companies. Good thing is we can have some control over how much we make doing it. One of the reasons it's becoming this way might be our low cost, but it doesn't mean we'll stay that way.
__________________
British Airways flight asks for push back clearance from terminal.
Control Tower replies: "And where is the world's most experienced airline
going today without filing a flight plan?"
falconvalley is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2009, 14:45   #25
Socal321
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: here and there
Posts: 563
Default Re: Skywest to fly for Airtran

Quote:
Originally Posted by stuckingfk View Post
Or if you want to look at the positives for AirTran.

They create a market with a smaller plane at less risk to their bottom line. They create more demand for their product and maybe send Midwest to the crapper. People of this board seem to think that if you can fly an RJ into an airport that means you can somehow fill a 737, 717, 320, etc.

If these flights work, eventually they'll be able to send 717's on these routes.

Has anyone taken business classes here?
They already have 717s on some of these routes like STL.
Socal321 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2009 jetcareers.com