![]() | |
| | #51 |
| Senior Member |
Surreal, the dude can't even use proper sentence structures yet he's trying to convince us that he's better than "the poor." I kind of get where he's coming from though. All those poor people have caused so many of this country's problems. Things like war profiteering, pollution, shipping jobs out of the country. I really hate those poor people. Every time I fly over a trailer park or a monster truck rally I wish I had a bomb to drop on those d-bags.
__________________ <<<<<Hunter S. Thompson extends the Gonzo concept to flying. |
| |
| | #52 | |
| Junior Member | Quote:
Only thing I feel like adding is that most people spend their whole lives in the social class they were born into. I don't pretend to know the complex causes of poverty, but I do know that people born wealthy stay wealthy, people born into middle class stay middle class, and people born poor usually stay poor (obviously there are some exceptions). For whatever reason, the poorer you are to start with, the harder it is to get out of poverty. Poverty has far more to do with how our economy tends to keep people in the same social class than with the supposed laziness, ineptness, or wasteful spending habits of poor people. | |
| |
| | #53 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: The Death Star
Posts: 265
|
As an outsider looking in...................................... I am a fireman. A Paid fireman. There are volunteer firemen too. Thats part of our problem (from a union perspective) when it comes to pay and benefits. You see--when there are people willing to do your job for free--a LOT of people willing to do your job for free--your pay suffers because the supply of "cheap" labor outsizes the more expensive paid labor. (Nothing against my volly brothers--it's just a fact that we live with). It doesn't matter that paid districts provide insurance benefits--local communites see the lack of a payroll as a cost savings which offsets the higher insurance premiums. That's part of what I am seeing in the flying biz. There seems to be a huge number of people willing to get into an airline job for peanuts. I think that affects the pay for you guys. It's a matter of supply and demand. If everyone can do a job and the supply is inexhaustable, why on earth would management pay better? So turnover gets high--what they're saving on salaries more than apparently makes up for any losses of training investment. (Especially when they are making you take Jet courses to "weed out" undesirables). Another thing I see from outside looking in--you guys are the most unorganized organized labor force I have ever seen. Pick your forum, here APC or others--pilot group a bashes pilot group b which hates pilot group c and it seems like you all are so busy arguing over "LUV buys the atc guys pizza so they get preferential treatment" or "Mesa guys are not riding my jumpseat" that your pilot groups can't get together and do something about your wages. It seems to me that the management groups are not only winning--they may have already won since there is far more regional jets "clogging" the skies than mainline and they have you guys (your different pilot groups) fighting amongst yourselves over some real doozie arguments. Until you guys organize--like you did in history back (Yes I read flying the line 1 and 2) there is very little chance of EVER seeing pay and benefits where they should be. As a "civilian" who flies the airlines more than regularly, I agree with you guys--you should be paid more and the standard should be higher. I personally think the Airline "Apocalyse" is coming soon. I think the market will be so flooded with applicants from "disposable" airlines that Firebird is correct--you should plan for a long stay in the Regionals-whatever forms they mutate into. I say again--Until you guys bury the hatchet on stupid little things (the battles) get your pilot groups together on an agenda that will agree to you all--you will never have the power to win the war. But that's me--Jim the GA pilot seeing things from the outside and sighing at the loss of a once proud and noble profession.
__________________ fuggedaboudit!!!--- |
| |
| | #54 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
I need to get me some popcorn, cause this one might be good. Too bad Lloyd hasn't read this yet. Might be a tactical strike coming on.
__________________ "I'm The Doctor, by the way. Run for your life!" | |
| |
| | #55 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: wish it was Oz, unfortunately its the airport
Posts: 211
| Quote:
The luster of flying for regional goes away quick when you go to order your "value-meal" at McDees in the airport and realize hour per dollar that the kid behind the counter makes more than you. And they get to sleep in their own bed every night to boot!
__________________ </div> | |
| |
| | #56 |
| Old Skool |
As yet another outsider looking in, I have a suggestion... ALPA (for that matter - ALL of the pilot labor groups) need to go on a MASSIVE marketing blitz. I talk to a lot of my fellow business travelers. Many of them have zero clue that they're a) flying on a regional jet b) that the crew's QoL/Pay are what they are and c) are generally shocked when I tell them what the crews are generally paid for the schedules they work, even beyond first-year pay. I've been a heavy frequent flyer for 15 years, but I only learned about this stuff since coming to JC almost two years ago. To the man, they have all said, (and I'm paraphrasing) "Wow, that sucks! I don't want a pilot paid so little flying me and my family!" There, I think, is your weapon. People are conditioned to believe that you guys are overpaid button-pushers who jet off to Paris on the weekends and shack up with 3 FAs at a time on your overnights. But get the people paying the bills on your side, and management is going to pay more attention (and, potentially, money) if the public realizes the state of y'all's situation. They simply do not know, and they need to. At the very least, it might garner you some public support the next time you have to hit the picket line. Might even cut down on the SJS a bit. Could also contribute to FAA revisions to raise the minimums for 121 flying as well. Just my .02 as a very regular customer of the services you guys provide. Matter of fact, I'm writing this in an airport right now.
__________________ "Tell the truth/explain to me/how you got this need for speed/she laughed and said it might just be the next best thing to love." David Wilcox, "Eye Of The Hurricane" |
| |
| | #57 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: *ATTENDING NetworkJC '09
Posts: 4,372
| Quote:
I agree wholeheartedly, sir. Getting the word out is priority one. Rally the masses and build an army. So.. then... now what?
__________________ www.remember3407project.org 'Rapid Upgrade' is a trap. http://forums.jetcareers.com/airline...ur-career.html | |
| |
| | #58 |
| Senior Member |
I agree fear is a great attention getter. We have to follow it up with something else though. The only thing that I think is going to work is moving towards solidarity as a pilot group. Regardless of which airline we're at Unfortunately I don't see this happening soon. Just by observing the pilots over here at Colgan with the ALPA vs Teamsters. The majority of the people I talk to who are against ALPA say it's because they don't want to be the same union as the Pinnacle Pilots. We have to work together, regional vs regional and regional vs major. Or we're going to keep failing together.
__________________ <<<<<Hunter S. Thompson extends the Gonzo concept to flying. |
| |
| | #59 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: *ATTENDING NetworkJC '09
Posts: 4,372
| Quote:
ie... you know those ads in jetbridges? Exactly. "The airplane you're about to get on is flown by an aircrew who got only X hours of time off last night. Only X hours were able to be used for sleeping." "The aircrew working hard for your safety makes an average wage of X dollars per hour" (factor in the "ground time" hours we aren't paid full wage rates for...) "The flight attendants make even less....."
__________________ www.remember3407project.org 'Rapid Upgrade' is a trap. http://forums.jetcareers.com/airline...ur-career.html | |
| |
| | #60 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: The Land of the Large...
Posts: 225
|
Don’t expect too much public sympathy in your campaign. Management has a very good tactical advantage with the flying public. Combined with ever changing fees, lack of service, low employee morale, rotten attitudes, and actions of TSA at security checkpoints has created commercial airline travel something similar to a Gestapo DMV. After going through that do you think the flying public is going to be sympathetic to our plight? F-No! They are going to still try to find the lowest fare online because they want to make sure they are paying the cheapest and not pay one red cent more than the next guy to go through that experience again. Management knows and uses this to whipsaw labor inline to their own means. Yes the perceptions of all pilots from the flying public are different than reality. I just tell them what they want to hear. One guy asked me how bad are things for us. I told him now I have to fly twice a month to my second home in Oahu to work on the yard and pool because I had to let my house staff go. Cheap fun but it’s the only fun I can afford…
__________________ Regional Pilot - Wake up in Canada, Go to sleep in Mexico. |
| |
| | #61 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
The people will create their own fear, honestly. Don't underestimate the intelligence of the public in this regard. Just tell them the truth, back it with facts. Don't even go emotional. They'll get it. More importantly, your business travelers are the meat of your business, I believe, and they will most assuredly get it. I know I do a lot of cheerleading for SWA - but there is a damn good reason for it, and it has very little to do with the fares. Ironically, they have a relatively happy labor group, too. Go figure.
__________________ "Tell the truth/explain to me/how you got this need for speed/she laughed and said it might just be the next best thing to love." David Wilcox, "Eye Of The Hurricane" | |
| |
| | #62 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: ATL
Posts: 2,811
|
Just my opinion.... The public won't care... Most pilots don't care.... The regionals are a stepping stone to most which leads to... Most people not caring.... Besides with the economy the way it is right now what benefits are there to gain from some mini crusade to up wages? Better try in about...5 years when the age 65ers start retiring... Peace!
__________________ Comm-ASEL, MEL, Inst. CFI, CFII, MEI TT: 1300 CRJ700/900 FO B.S. Aviation Management-Business Minor Southeastern Oklahoma State University Cum Laude Graduate |
| |
| | #63 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,975
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #64 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
Which is something else we need to educate in the pilot group. The music has stopped. Period. That "stepping stone" has now become a place you're gonna spend 3-5 years at unless something dramatic happens. All those commercial pilots hoping for a shot at the regionals just had 340+ more qualified applicants put right in front of them from XJT alone. Factor in the other regionals that have furloughed/are planning on it, and there's not much movement going on from the CFI level upward except in 135 ops. None of the major airlines are hiring right now, so attrition is at a more or less stand still at the regionals barring retirements, people saying "screw this" or the extremely lucky ones that get on with an operation like Netjets, Emirates, etc. The "its just a stepping stone" argument ticks me off to no end. I don't wanna spend the rest of my career at a regional airline either, but that doesn't mean I'm willing to get used and abused while I'm here. Since my time here has been extended, I REALLY don't wanna get used and abused.
__________________ "I'm The Doctor, by the way. Run for your life!" | |
| |
| | #65 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: DFW
Posts: 7,993
| Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() A-FREAKING-men, Steve!! Well said!! | |
| |
| | #66 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
This "stepping stone" becomes more a career every day. Doesn't mean I want to spend the rest of my days slogging it out in the trenches....but harsh reality of the matter is the majority of us will do just that. It pisses me off as well to hear the "I'm not spending my career here" guys. OK good luck w/ that. You better believe I will be doing whatever I can to escape the regional world when (if) the music ever starts playing again....but in the meantime, I will be doing everything I can to improve the regional workplace. This IS a career.....hopefully it's not gonna be mine, but I'm going to plan for the worst and work towards the best.Wake up people, we need to start changing the professioal pilot collective attitude towards this "stepping stone" mentality. Better do whatever you can to improve work rules/ payrates.....'cause chances are you're going to be at the regional level much longer than originally planned, and YOU'RE GONNA NEED 'EM! Last edited by Cruise; August 19th, 2008 at 00:46. | |
| |
| | #67 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: *ATTENDING NetworkJC '09
Posts: 4,372
| Quote:
The "staffing floor" and various scope clauses... may well be history AND soon. Why? Because the AA/APA kids are too expensive. They're gonna go get some new kids... or.. in my opinion, continue to swell Eagle up from beneath them... for the time being, anyhow. Then they'll start trying to subcontract out more Eagle flying.. and the cycle goes on, and on, etc.. The status quo of airline pilot career progression has no guaranteed timeline, has no guarantee of future development, and no guarantee of a static industry. Wake up and smell the coffee man.
__________________ www.remember3407project.org 'Rapid Upgrade' is a trap. http://forums.jetcareers.com/airline...ur-career.html | |
| |
| | #68 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 352
| Quote:
You can start with an OUPV - that's the entry level one anyway - that will allow you to run fishing charters. But if you're in it for the money - you need to look at working cargo ships. There's no money in running passenger ships - plus you have to deal with more BS from the self-loading cargo.
__________________ Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from surviving bad judgement. | |
| |
| | #69 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
Its sad when the person loading the bags, and dumping the lavs, etc., are making as much, or more, than the people flying the airplanes.
__________________ "Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go." | |
| |
| | #70 |
| Old Skool |
Do those rampers / gate agents have to get a medical certificate for the rest of their life, every 12 months? Do those rampers / gate agents have to go through recurrent every 6 months to show that they can still perform the job - in essence - to show that they do not need to be let go because they suck at flying a box? Do those rampers / gate agents have a certificate that can quickly be revoked or suspended by a federal agency?
__________________ DoD WxFcstr.AGI.MEI.CFI.CFII.FO.CRJ2.Furloughed | The TRoP | ALPA | APSA | ACLU | IVAW | Acey 80| |
| |
| | #71 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: GKY
Posts: 3,386
|
You can't really complain, at this point. They offered you a crappy pay scale, and you guys all took it. A majority of the people that took these RJ jobs wouldn't have gotten them at 3 years ago with 800/100, or even 1200/200. No one forced you to work there, and that is the problem. Too many people with SJS, or other motivations that will sacrifice their credit, their family, and other things in life to fly for a RJ company for 18-20k a year and then get shown the door after a year. I know it sounds harsh, and I don't mean to minimize your frustrations, but you were obviously motivated by something besides better pay for your peers. SJS? That seems to be what you alluded to in the first post. I was there at some point, too. I thought about it very hard and almost took the plunge. I had to really look at myself in the mirror and ask if it was worth it. 18-20k a year? No. Being away from home? No. Flying in a company where I am just a number? No. Once I got to this point, I decided it wasn't worth it. Although I am still puttering around in Cessnas and Seminoles, I am enjoying my life a lot more than I would as an airline pilot and get paid much more. I get to stay at home every night and set my own schedule. I guess the point I am trying to make is the same point that others have posted: Even though the pay and industry sucks, as long as they are hiring, there will be droves of people lined up at the door to get in. As long as this is true, nothing will ever change. |
| |
| | #72 |
| Old Skool |
It will continue to be viewed as complaining, rather than conversation about the industry. The trend continues. My questions still stand though. . .do those individuals subject themselves by nature of federal regulations to the same or similar standards as professional pilots, not just 121 pilots.
__________________ DoD WxFcstr.AGI.MEI.CFI.CFII.FO.CRJ2.Furloughed | The TRoP | ALPA | APSA | ACLU | IVAW | Acey 80| |
| |
| | #73 |
| Senior Member |
What are you doing for a living Mojo? I got into this career for the eventual high pay, not SJS. I watched my Dad with his schedule and his pay and figured I should go for it. I figured if I payed my dues my day would come. I think most of us feel that way. What Firebird is saying, which has been a sneaking suspicion of mine, is that that day may not come. After the last round of furloughs, there weren't any pilot groups that successfully took back their pay. Now the majors are furloughing again, and their pay is lower than it was 10 years ago. I'm afraid that without a strong change of course from the feds in terms of allowing strikes, we won't ever get that pay back. If that's the case then these last few years of eating Mac'n'Cheese have been totally in vain. That's my biggest worry. Which is why even though I agree that we knew our pay from the onset, I think we should push for higher pay. It looks like I'm going to be stuck in the right seat at Colgan for much longer than I intended. Who knows when I'll ever make the jump to the majors. In the meantime if the majors are going to push more flying on to the regionals we need to stand up and demand appropriate rates for that flying.
__________________ <<<<<Hunter S. Thompson extends the Gonzo concept to flying. |
| |
| | #74 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
Sorta like what NWA is doing with Compass and Mesaba. A lot of the gates I see -900s and 175s parked at in MEM used to have DC-9s parked there. That's not that big a deal....until you look at the board and see the destination ALSO used to be a DC-9 route. Someone asked me if Pinnacle was hurting b/c of all the flying we're losing to XJ and Compass. When I looked, we really haven't lost that much to them except on the -200 side in MSP. NWA mainline has taken it on the chin a LOT worse than we have. 9E never did MSP-ORD or other similar routes. Management has seen a way to cut costs by shifting mainline flying down to the regional level with the "large regional jets." Like it or not, that trend doesn't seem to be stopping.
__________________ "I'm The Doctor, by the way. Run for your life!" | |
| |
| | #75 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: PAMR
Posts: 1,857
|
I haven't been able to read this entire thread but I have some what of a different take, and perhaps I am wrong. I see all these small regionals folding up and losing money. I also hear about big airlines wanting to use bigger planes and less frequent flights because RJs are hard to make money with with such a high cost of fuel. If oil stays at $90-100/bbl then I don't see how, from a profitability stand point, airlines can continue to justify using large amounts of RJs. Then again this is the airlines and profitability has not been part of their decision making in recent years.
|
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |