![]() |
| | #1 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 2,053
| http://www.embraer.com.br/institucio...E-Jet-I-08.pdf Why? We have 17 Frontier 170's sitting around doing nothing and we're still taking deliveries of new planes? Makes no sense to me...
__________________ JBDaP --------------- "The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training" - Joe Biden on Obama's lack of experience. |
| |
| | #2 |
| Old Skool |
This makes it seem like only one more got added... I would have a hard time believing you all would get those others right now but other things have happen. Especially with just about every regional offering LOA's I'd be shocked to see new airplanes on RAH property with the others parked right now. Who knows.
|
| |
| | #3 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 2,053
| Quote:
__________________ JBDaP --------------- "The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training" - Joe Biden on Obama's lack of experience. | |
| |
| | #4 |
| Agent Smith |
Probably one of those issues where you order 2 kegs for a party but only 15 people show up.
__________________ Doug Taylor http://76school.flyblog.com (old!) http://30west.flyblog.com (updated 11/28) |
| |
| | #5 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Seattle
Posts: 87
|
Because (and this is for meyers), RAH is just that cool. Seriously though, curious about that myself, but around here we have no more good info on what's really going on than anyone else does, so guess time will tell.
|
| |
| | #6 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
![]() On a serious note, It takes more than a few days to make an airplane. It was probably already in the pipeline down in Brazil, so It would cost more to try to pull a half finished plane out of the line than to actually make it. Secondly its probably in the Airways CPA that they need X number of 86 seat 175s where the 170s that are parked are 76 seaters.
__________________ As a wise man said, sumb!tch flew in, sumb!tch'll fly out. Ski Hard. Party Harder. | |
| |
| | #7 |
| Old Skool |
Wait, the 175s are EIGHTY SIX seaters? I had hoped that had ended with the Mesa -900s, but oh well. Another mainline size airplane at the regionals.....
__________________ "I'm The Doctor, by the way. Run for your life!" |
| |
| | #8 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Spokane(KGEG)
Posts: 142
|
What the matter with having a couple more seats? Just mean a few more people are going to make fun of your landings.
__________________ When in doubt pinky out. |
| |
| | #9 |
| Old Skool | Much to learn, you have.
|
| |
| | #10 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
Anyways back to the thread no one knows but BB. Perhaps you all can e mail him and inquire as to why he did such. I'm sure as you all know he runs a solid company until he leaves it. Thus he probably has a reason for the madness. Or perhaps some legality in the contract for these news birds. SO much more that goes into this then just adding a plane. Business law and partnerships would be a good place to go an educate yourself about contracts and thus how its hard to get out of such if you signed on the bottom line for new planes they are yours. If you are lucky perhaps delaying the delivery can occur but it depends. Regardless thus no one knew what was going to happen with the frontier stuff and the rest of the industry. Therefore the planes were purchased long before this and the financial responsiblity is on RAH for them I would assume. Now one of the many lawyers we have perhaps could state how RAH could get out of these new planes or thus delay the options. But too much red tape for me to explain. Lastly RAH is about as cool as Mesa/Skywest/PDT/Gojets/TSA/AWAC/Comair etc etc... we all work for regionals and all regionals suck.... | |
| |
| | #11 |
| Old Skool | Oh no you did not just say that.... watch out Steve for your back now! I've got your covered but you just open some worms!
|
| |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member |
Anyone know what year the ATR-72 was first certified or when it was first flown by a US carrier? Thanks ![]() (It's not thread creep if you really think on it.....)
__________________ Hey! It's all ball bearings nowadays. Now you prepare that Fetzer valve with some 3-in-1 oil and some gauze pads. - Irwin M Fletcher |
| |
| | #13 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: CMH
Posts: 805
| Quote:
Careful Meyers doesn't like anyone who likes where they work. Especially new guys at RAH...![]() BB just wanted the "400th" thing painted on the side. If it wasn't for that he would have scrapped it. But who knows probably what was said about it already being assembled and couldn't defer the delivery.PS: The above comment was made in jest and was just messing around so don't take it the wrong way!
__________________ I approve this message. Last edited by SoCalAprch; June 7th, 2008 at 12:43. | |
| |
| | #14 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 2,053
| Quote:
Yes, the 175's have 86 seats. Don't like the scope? Talk to Airways about that.
__________________ JBDaP --------------- "The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training" - Joe Biden on Obama's lack of experience. | |
| |
| | #15 | ||
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Seattle
Posts: 87
| Quote:
![]() Quote:
"
| ||
| |
| | #16 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
However as your co worker already addressed it as to what most would think as far as to why the delivery of this AC. Probably more to the story then we all know. Thus legal terms in which is non of our business. | |
| |
| | #17 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
However you are right its the West side to blame on giving up that scope. Thus Mesa went there and shortly came RAH. However after being in CLT and at the training center they are cross training all FA's into the E190. More E190s are coming over to mainline in the near future. Also road with a guy who is transitioning into the E190 and cannot wait for mainline. Stated they have E190's comming and more Airbus in the future. Thus scope as we all know mainline (Airawys) will be trying to get back down. then we will see what happens.
| |
| |
| | #18 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Nomadic...World Wide Boobie Bungalow Bouncer
Posts: 3,190
|
Its in RAHs best interest to get as many of the larger, more survivable, airplane on property. USair wanted 175s not 170s...So it doesnt make sense to say,"hot bout those 170s that you had before, you want them back instead of the newer larger plane?"...
__________________ "I do not proofread" |
| |
| | #19 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: _
Posts: 5,494
| Quote:
My guess is you are a first year FO who has their first gig outside of CFI'ing, if you ever did much of that even. Honestly, it gets better man. Hang in there. I'm a big pessimist but only because I don't like to be disappointed, but I still think the job is great. Even at the regional level. No, it's not as good as working for FedEx making $300k/yr but you'll get there. Provided oil doesn't go to $200/bbl in 2 months and our economy doesn't shut down and all airlines merge into one national carrier and contract by 95%.
__________________ "It takes just as much time to be nice to someone as it does to be a jerk." | |
| |
| | #20 | |
| Old Skool Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 2,053
| Quote:
Aye yi yi
__________________ JBDaP --------------- "The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training" - Joe Biden on Obama's lack of experience. | |
| |
| | #21 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #22 | |
| Old Skool | Quote:
The couldnt care less was to your thought on scope and allowing more. Its against my thought and many here. Yet if you want to argue why its good for the industry to not have scope or scope planes at more then 70 feel free to do so. I'm open ears to your thoughts... Please do explain. Lastly contracts mean nothing if a Chap 11 were to occur. ANother thing to keep in mind. THings change entirely too fast to go pulling out a contract. What just happen to Frontier and your flying? CHap 11 I am pretty sure. Thus it sucks and its not right but that happens. I would not want anyone to lose pilots and jobs due to another carrier filing chap 11 and your contract thus is out the door. Just keep in mind how contracts do work with CHap 11 and other bankruptcy laws. | |
| |
| | #23 |
| Old Skool | Do you really want more planes right now with routes being cut? Thus more planes your company would be paying on and not being used to the fullest extent? Asking more so here. I agree as a company with scope the way it is bigger planes do seem the way to go. Now would I agree with that no, but just asking if planes on property that arent being used (bigger) would be a good thing?
|
| |
| | #24 |
| Old Skool Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: _
Posts: 5,494
| So take your own advice, look out for number one and stop worrying about other companies and their pilots. What we should be worrying about is US Air, they've been ranked as the first legacy to go out of business within the next year or so. Since both of our jobs hinge on that fact I'd say worry less about what the #### republic is doing and more about what US Air is doing. They just issued a press release stating how they can't park any of their old 737's because they lease 95% of their planes and their lessors won't let them return them.
__________________ "It takes just as much time to be nice to someone as it does to be a jerk." |
| |
| | #25 |
| Old Skool | Good luck to all.
__________________ www.alpa.org |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |