jetcareers

Go Back   jetcareers > Career Specific > Airline Pilots

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 24th, 2008, 21:10   #26
kellwolf
Old Skool
 
kellwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 13,529
Send a message via AIM to kellwolf
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tram View Post
Pinnacle is replacing the entire fleet with Q400's..

We are slated to get the first 4 in July of 08'.. 4 a month until October, then it's 8 a month... *
Yeah, I heard that when I was at the CEC today. People are starting to get worried that they might go to Colgan, though.
__________________
"I'm The Doctor, by the way. Run for your life!"
kellwolf is offline  
Old April 24th, 2008, 22:35   #27
PatrickCPS
Senior Member
 
PatrickCPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kansas City MO
Posts: 352
Send a message via AIM to PatrickCPS
Default Re: no more jets for QX

If the cost of fuel doesn't come down (and I don't see any reason why it would), I think you'll see more airlines dumping RJs for Tprops to try and get some profitability back into the companies.
__________________
Patrick Lee
www.careerpilotschool.com
PatrickCPS is offline  
Old April 25th, 2008, 00:28   #28
meyers9163
Old Skool
 
meyers9163's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,002
Send a message via Yahoo to meyers9163
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by UPSpilot View Post
This is actually good new when you really think about it. It means that Horizon will go back to being a real "regional" airline, flying turboprops like regionals are supposed to do. They will probably stop flying the longer legs that they currently fly and have Alaska take those back over with mainline jets. If more regionals did this there would be more mainline domestic flying and more mainline jobs in the future, which IS the reason that y'all are here in the first place isn't it?

Interesting take.... Although you have a point.... I never thought of this until talking to a buddy at DAL tonight..... If the legacy carriers would take over the E170s, E175, CRJ900 etc.... That would then also create more jobs at mainline. Hence the regionals are then flying small aircraft and more so along regional routes... In addition mainline would then have more planes, more positions, more jobs, and a chance to get onto a major carrrier earlier in your career perhaps..... I really think you have a great point there..... However many probably overlook this as its become very common place. However if you are a regional pilot you ask a mainline guy for the most part they would agree... The 76 seaters plus belong at mainline.....
meyers9163 is offline  
Old April 25th, 2008, 00:30   #29
surreal1221
Old Skool
 
surreal1221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alpha Tango Lima
Posts: 8,985
Send a message via AIM to surreal1221
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by meyers9163 View Post
So 21 CRJ 700s that are relatively new arent they? Where the hell do you place 21 RJ700's to?
I'm sure someone will buy those beast up.

If they go out into the market, I wouldn't complain if we bought them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatrickCPS View Post
If the cost of fuel doesn't come down (and I don't see any reason why it would), I think you'll see more airlines dumping RJs for Tprops to try and get some profitability back into the companies.
A strengthening dollar will allow the price to decrease.
__________________
AGI.MEI.CFI.CFII.FO.CRJ2 | Josh | The TRoP | Rmble On | ALPA |
surreal1221 is offline  
Old April 25th, 2008, 00:47   #30
PanJet
Senior Member
 
PanJet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 556
Default Re: no more jets for QX

This is interesting because I know the Horizon just recently hired a few new guys (even though they're supposedly not hiring), and some of them went straight into the CR7.
__________________
"Do you want to be a co-captain or a button pushing $@%#$ ??" -Friend

Commercial Pilot-ASEL, AMEL, IA
CFI, CFII, MEI
1,450TT/200ME
Part 61 CFI and college student
Former aerial photo pilot
PanJet is offline  
Old April 25th, 2008, 10:40   #31
ready2fly
Old Skool
 
ready2fly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,113
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonzo View Post
You will see E170's at Eagle before any new 700's.
No, no, no......the additional 700's are coming any day!! They promised! It's a done deal.



According to a source in the training department (so you know how valid this is ) Eagle has obtained the financing for the additional 25 CRJ-700's and is just waiting on the go-ahead to purchase them.


......That....and two month upgrades for 500 hour pilots is right around the corner too.

Hey -it's Ealge! You believe things when you see things.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlyingTurkey
Socialized medicine=anti-American=will never happen.
The troops will not be leaving Iraq in 4 years.
Abortion will stay legal.
Congress will stay mostly split.
Nothing will change.
ready2fly is offline  
Old April 27th, 2008, 13:25   #32
Cheechako
Senior Member
 
Cheechako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wasilla, AK
Posts: 972
Send a message via AIM to Cheechako Send a message via MSN to Cheechako Send a message via Yahoo to Cheechako
Default Re: no more jets for QX

I was just reading about the fleet plan this morning,

Here's what it boils down to.
Currently:
12 Q200s
33 Q400s
20 CRJ700s
65 total airplanes times 5 crews per (just a guess) = 325 crews

After the 18-24 month transition leaves:
48 Q400s times 5 crews = 240 crews

That's a difference of 85 crews, or 170 pilot positions based on 5 crews per aircraft. Does anybody have more accurate staffing numbers?

While this sounds tough for the Horizon guys, this is exactly how the relationship between mainline and regional should work. While Horizon can actually be profitable on the CRJ runs, the Air Group suffers. On some of the routes, the Air Group can yank a CRJ and substitute it with a mainline 737 and lose less money- that's the key in today's industry. Profitability, hopefully, will soon follow. This also trims costs for Horizon by going to one fleet type- another key today. They're saying the fleet transition plan could save $50 million a year.

One disturbing note, though is
Quote:
But the fact remains that Alaska's losses from our CRJ CPA flying are substantial. One way for Alaska to reduce these loses is to have Horizon operate them with a Q400 or pursue another less costly alternative, like finding another regional airline that would serve the market on its own.

This sounds to me like, "we can't make money with our own equipment, so let's make money by handing off the losses to someone else." Good business sense, bad for employees.
__________________
Urban Dictionary: /chee-CHA-ko/

Alaska Airlines 737 FO

http://www.AllAboutGod.com
Cheechako is offline  
Old April 27th, 2008, 18:58   #33
cfii2007
Senior Member
 
cfii2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: no more jets for QX

It would be ironic if CRJ's went away in the next 3-5 years, replaced by turboprops, and mainline flying picked up the former routes, with less congested airports, fewer lost bags and better paid pilots.
cfii2007 is offline  
Old April 27th, 2008, 19:09   #34
UPSpilot
Junior Member
 
UPSpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SDF
Posts: 107
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfii2007 View Post
It would be ironic if CRJ's went away in the next 3-5 years, replaced by turboprops, and mainline flying picked up the former routes, with less congested airports, fewer lost bags and better paid pilots.

It would be even better if all RJs period, went away.
UPSpilot is offline  
Old April 27th, 2008, 19:17   #35
SoCalAprch
Senior Member
 
SoCalAprch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CMH
Posts: 758
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by UPSpilot View Post
It would be even better if all RJs period, went away.
The who would you have to talk down to UPS? RJs may start being replaced with T-Props but there will always be regional airlines providing that lift.
__________________
Florence Y'all
SoCalAprch is offline  
Old April 28th, 2008, 10:09   #36
UPSpilot
Junior Member
 
UPSpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SDF
Posts: 107
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalAprch View Post
The who would you have to talk down to UPS? RJs may start being replaced with T-Props but there will always be regional airlines providing that lift.

Not talking "down" to anyone, even you. "Regionals" should go back to being "commuters" flying turboprops and all jet flying should be at the mainline. That way you guys would have something to look forward to instead of being a regional lifer like so many are today.
UPSpilot is offline  
Old April 28th, 2008, 11:05   #37
kellwolf
Old Skool
 
kellwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 13,529
Send a message via AIM to kellwolf
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by UPSpilot View Post
Not talking "down" to anyone, even you. "Regionals" should go back to being "commuters" flying turboprops and all jet flying should be at the mainline. That way you guys would have something to look forward to instead of being a regional lifer like so many are today.
I agree with the message, but often time the tone and the wording used to convey your message DOES come off as talking down to people. That tends to get the message lost.
__________________
"I'm The Doctor, by the way. Run for your life!"
kellwolf is offline  
Old April 28th, 2008, 11:37   #38
Baronman
Senior Member
 
Baronman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NEWARK
Posts: 1,038
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Just curious...Why would major airline execs want regional jets at the majors? Right now you can get a big RJ flying around with a first class section etc with guys up front making $65/hr and $23/hr and flight attendants in the back making a corresponding salary. Even better is that the guys doing it think they're doing "all right" and are happy to be there. As long as it's a quick upgrade who cares what the pay is, I'm flying, I'm getting paid, I'll upgrade soon, and hopefully I'll be at a major. It's a lost cause.
__________________
"I got a FEVER, and the only perscription is more Cow-Bell!"
Baronman is offline  
Old April 28th, 2008, 11:49   #39
kellwolf
Old Skool
 
kellwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 13,529
Send a message via AIM to kellwolf
Default Re: no more jets for QX

The execs wouldn't. For the progression of the profession overall, it'd be good, though. I believe RJs were offered to the mainline guys first b/c they HAD to be b/c of scope clauses. Hindsight's always 20/20, though.
__________________
"I'm The Doctor, by the way. Run for your life!"
kellwolf is offline  
Old April 28th, 2008, 12:19   #40
UPSpilot
Junior Member
 
UPSpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SDF
Posts: 107
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baronman View Post
Just curious...Why would major airline execs want regional jets at the majors? Right now you can get a big RJ flying around with a first class section etc with guys up front making $65/hr and $23/hr and flight attendants in the back making a corresponding salary. Even better is that the guys doing it think they're doing "all right" and are happy to be there. As long as it's a quick upgrade who cares what the pay is, I'm flying, I'm getting paid, I'll upgrade soon, and hopefully I'll be at a major. It's a lost cause.


You're right, it is a lost cause. All this wishful thinking won't change a thing. The passenger airline industry is hopelessly screwed and will never be like it was in the "glory days" that the young guns still fantasize about when they start flight training.
UPSpilot is offline  
Old May 1st, 2008, 23:42   #41
Rayflyoz
Junior Member
 
Rayflyoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pdx
Posts: 108
Send a message via Yahoo to Rayflyoz
Default Re: no more jets for QX

It’s hard to predict what will actually happen at Horizon. There a lot of rumors floating around right now. There is still the idea that this is bullying tactics to force us to sign a contract we don’t want (pay cut). Or even that a bigger jet is on the way, E190 or something like that. Basically it goes from bad, -20 RJ's and no increase which means around 200 pilot reduction. Ok, one for one with the 400 and not much change. And good, a new a/c on property. So far I'm betting on the one for one. However it might be time to update the ole resume
Rayflyoz is offline  
Old May 1st, 2008, 23:45   #42
Rayflyoz
Junior Member
 
Rayflyoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pdx
Posts: 108
Send a message via Yahoo to Rayflyoz
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by PanJet View Post
This is interesting because I know the Horizon just recently hired a few new guys (even though they're supposedly not hiring), and some of them went straight into the CR7.

Yes we did and there is a class of 8 for the Q400 in May. The question I’m wondering is if were overstaffed of the jet and the Q200, and possibility in 18 months of furloughs. Why are we hiring???
Rayflyoz is offline  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 01:17   #43
TexasFlyer
Senior Member
 
TexasFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 370
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayflyoz View Post
Yes we did and there is a class of 8 for the Q400 in May. The question I’m wondering is if were overstaffed of the jet and the Q200, and possibility in 18 months of furloughs. Why are we hiring???
I gave up asking why in this industry. It's gotten me nowhere.

I love the Q400 though as an aircraft. But then, I'm a t-prop fan. Not a fan of t-prop pay though (or any Regional pay for that matter). But again, I won't ask why on pay either since again that will get me nowhere...
TexasFlyer is offline  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 03:46   #44
Rayflyoz
Junior Member
 
Rayflyoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pdx
Posts: 108
Send a message via Yahoo to Rayflyoz
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Good point, I tried to understand airline thinking. Say for example crew scheduling, however I just got a bad headache.
Rayflyoz is offline  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 15:29   #45
bike21
Old Skool
 
bike21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: People's Republic of Boulder
Posts: 2,214
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasFlyer View Post
I gave up asking why in this industry. It's gotten me nowhere.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayflyoz View Post
Good point, I tried to understand airline thinking. Say for example crew scheduling, however I just got a bad headache.
Amen to that. I have basically given up caring/ranting/internets debating about such things. Life is much easier just going to work and worrying about point A to B. Then going home forgetting about it all and riding my bike. Good stuff
__________________
Free SAPA! (and Tibet)
____________________

www.glenntilton.com
bike21 is offline  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 18:52   #46
meyers9163
Old Skool
 
meyers9163's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,002
Send a message via Yahoo to meyers9163
Default Re: no more jets for QX

Some SKW and DAL people out there... Any truth to SKW wanting to buy all of these planes? As well as perhaps DAL buying them I have read? Any sources or news coming from either company?
meyers9163 is offline  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 22:05   #47
Rayflyoz
Junior Member
 
Rayflyoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pdx
Posts: 108
Send a message via Yahoo to Rayflyoz
Default Re: no more jets for QX

I did hear somthing about Skywest getting them. but its too early to really know.
Rayflyoz is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 jetcareers.com