![]() |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Ppl w/ AT-SAT invite: vote for the last digit of your SSN! | |||
| 0 | | 9 | 20.00% |
| 1 | | 5 | 11.11% |
| 2 | | 2 | 4.44% |
| 3 | | 4 | 8.89% |
| 4 | | 3 | 6.67% |
| 5 | | 1 | 2.22% |
| 6 | | 6 | 13.33% |
| 7 | | 5 | 11.11% |
| 8 | | 4 | 8.89% |
| 9 | | 6 | 13.33% |
| Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: PUBNAT3
Posts: 398
|
***please note, above poll is anonymous. Your username won't be associated with your vote!*** Is the AT-SAT selected on the basis of last SSN number? I've seen this mentioned a few times here on the boards. Is this for real? I thought that as long as you meet the minimum requirements you get selected for the test. Please reply if you know a definite answer and note the source of your information. Speculation and rumors on this board are everywhere and it's hard to take things seriously unless there's some evidence it came from a person who knows what the deal is. Better yet, if you've been invited to take the AT-SAT or have taken it, please vote in the poll and say the following, in case the PUBNATs switched SSNs: Last#: ***-**-***? Selected for PUBNAT? I want to figure out if this is true or not. ------------------------ Known SSN last digits of ppl invited to take the AT-SAT: I'll update here as people reply so the info is in one place. PUBNAT1: 3, 9 PUBNAT2: 0, 0, 1, 3, 7 PUBNAT3: no invites yet
__________________ PUBNAT3's motto: Argh! Why didn't I see the application that closed 28 days earlier??! Last edited by HonuPineapple; July 17th, 2008 at 14:36. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 122
|
Last#: ***-**-**10 Selected for PUBNAT2
__________________ PUBNAT 2,4,5. AT-SAT 97.3% Pref: ZKC or KMCI Referral list PUBNAT2 PEPC Invite (ZKC) for 11-20-08 .... Hoping for the next step before 06/09/2014 |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 759
|
I honestly don't think you'll find someone on here who met the requirements and was not selected, but I'll play along... Last #: ***-**-***7 Selected for PUBNAT2
__________________ 05/02/2008 - PUBNAT2 05/28/2008 - Authorized to take AT-SAT 06/09/2008 - AT-SAT e-mail 07/14/2008 - AT-SAT date (NY - 91.5%) 08/04/2008 - Geo pref e-mail (NJ) 09/08/2008 - Referral list |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: PUBNAT3
Posts: 398
| I don't think I will either. That's why I'm hoping to debunk this. It would be nice to have one less bit of speculation on the boards.
__________________ PUBNAT3's motto: Argh! Why didn't I see the application that closed 28 days earlier??! |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: GA
Posts: 325
|
i think you can go ahead and get rid of the speculation, bc it would not make any sense to pick people to take the test based on their SSN, and then keep opening up more announcements every month. think about it 4000 applicants=1000 well qualified=800 OKC graduates=400 CPC A Complete estimate, but there is just not enough applicants to just leave people out. i posted on another thread where they only recieved 2500 applicants for PUBNAT2&3 and you know how many of those are just us reapplying. you have nothing to worry about, just pass the test and we will all be headed to OKC.
__________________ 05/02- OTS App. #2 05/28- AT SAT approved 06/16- AT SAT email 06/30- OTS App. #4 07/09- At SAT test date 07/14- At SAT score 100 07/17- OTS App. #5 08/11- GEO PREF. (GA,TN) 08/18- OTS App. #6 |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: austin
Posts: 39
| Quote:
BTW last # 0 pubnat 2 | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 131
|
Like I said in another post, it was absolutly true that they used SS# when they had a few massive job fairs back in 2005. I was there. My number didn't get picked, nor did my 3 other friends who also went. Since then the FFA came to realize that that system didn't work. With the PUBNA's, it looks like they are picking everyone to take the AT-SAT who meets the requirments. I've read of a few people who didn't get picked even though they were qualified, but that was because someone in OKC messed up when caculating their experience. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Long Island, NY.
Posts: 322
|
Last digit=#8. Obviously, no AT-SAT invite yet.
__________________ OTS Application: 5/30: PUBNAT3. 6/30: PUBNAT4. 7/18: AT-SAT Authorization. 7/29: AT-SAT Scheduling E-mail. 7/31: PUBNAT5. 8/15: AT-SAT. Dream Facility: KLAS or KVGT. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 32
|
I will agree with chichi on this...................... ***-**-***3 PUBNAT# 2
__________________ 05/02- Applied to OTS Announcement 07/15- AT-SAT in PTC (well qualified) 08/04- GEO Pref e-mail (GA, UT) 09/08- on Referral list |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Mexico
Posts: 60
|
Last digit 9, selected for AT-SAT in March for PUBNAT1 and PEPC in July.
|
| | |
| | #11 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 33
|
Ssn: ***-**-***1 Pubnat: 2
__________________ 5/02 - PUBNAT2 6/16 - AT-SAT email 7/8 - AT-SAT 93% Well Qualified 8/13 - Geo Prefs War Eagle! |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: OK
Posts: 35
|
***-**-***3, PUBNAT1, took AT-SAT at the end of April, PEPC 7/24.
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Victorville
Posts: 307
|
Looks like you get to take the AT-SAT as long as the last number isn't a 5
__________________ 05/02/08 OTS PUBNAT2 05/28/08 Eligible for ATSAT 05/30/08 OTS PUBNAT3 07/08/08 AT-SAT 07/10/08 AT-SAT Score 100 07/31/08 OTS PUBNAT5 08/04/08 geo Preference (CA, AZ) 08/18/08 OTS PUBNAT6 |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Midwest
Posts: 36
|
PUBNAT1 ***-**-***7 AT-SAT 3/26/08 in OKC. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Junior Member |
Last digit 4...waited 2 years for them to select me for the AT-SAT (1/16 applications successful)
|
| | |
| | #16 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: NN, VA
Posts: 69
|
#6 Pubnat 2
__________________ 7/1/08 -AT-SAT 7/7/08 -Well Qualified 10/9/08 -PEPC invite |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: PUBNAT3
Posts: 398
|
#4 Pubnat 3 I can't edit the original post anymore for some reason, but we have the poll now.
__________________ PUBNAT3's motto: Argh! Why didn't I see the application that closed 28 days earlier??! |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Northern CA
Posts: 594
| Quote:
I'm a 5
__________________ movin' trains, night and day ATC applicant 02/08 NY PEPC, July 9th Terminal in the Bay Area, CA Clearances approved, waiting... | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Laurel
Posts: 71
|
hate to debunk your pubnat1 numbers, cause 0 is the last for my ssn. and got selected for pubnat 1 to take at-sat.
__________________ referral list - 6-6-08 selected for MN center - 7/08 Interview(SLC center) - 8-19-08 TOL - 9-2-08 Background check paperwork done. MMPI Scheuled Medical Scheduled |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Greenfield
Posts: 1
|
Last Digit of 1. I took the test Nov 8th of 2005 and got a 96.4 was told I was selected because they took everybody with the lasr digit 0 or 1. I was told by someone who works at Indy Center the reason I never got an interview is they only hired people with the last digit of 0. |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Victorville
Posts: 307
| Quote:
__________________ 05/02/08 OTS PUBNAT2 05/28/08 Eligible for ATSAT 05/30/08 OTS PUBNAT3 07/08/08 AT-SAT 07/10/08 AT-SAT Score 100 07/31/08 OTS PUBNAT5 08/04/08 geo Preference (CA, AZ) 08/18/08 OTS PUBNAT6 | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Austin, Republic of Texas
Posts: 131
|
Let's let this thread die a quick death, as speculation that AT-SAT selection is based upon a correlation between SSN and PUBNAT number is, well, ridiculous. Even for the FAA. There's plenty of evidence saying otherwise, both here and elsewhere, not to mention rational thinking. As tempting as it may be to entertain hearsay while waiting (and waiting... and waiting...) for the next step in the process, it's just going to make it that much harder for us -- and newcomers -- to filter out the real, useful information from the inanity. No need to point out that I'm not helping the thread die by bumping it up with a post. The irony has already occurred to me.
__________________ Applied PUBNAT3/4/5/6 - May 31, et al. AT-SAT - Aug. 14 |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |