![]() |
| | #351 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Dallas (Plano, really)
Posts: 611
| ATCproMatt... those planes on the left look AWFULLY close together! ![]()
__________________ 2/08 Applied OTS 3/08 AT-SAT (90.8) ![]() 5/08 Geo Pref (ARTCC & Terminal - TX & GA) 6/08 Selected for ZFW (Fort Worth ARTCC) ![]() 8/08 Chicago PEPC - TOL in hand (Age is frozen! )
|
| | |
| | #352 |
| Newbie Join Date: May 2008 Location: Stratford, CT
Posts: 6
| 93.4% Holtsville, NY 7/8!!! Im happy with that. |
| | |
| | #353 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Victorville
Posts: 194
| They sure got my score up fast. I only had to wait 2 days ![]()
__________________ 05/02/08 OTS PUBNAT2 05/28/08 Eligible for ATSAT 05/30/08 OTS PUBNAT3 07/08/08 AT-SAT 07/10/08 AT-SAT Score 100 07/31/08 OTS PUBNAT5 08/04/08 geo Preference (CA, AZ) 08/18/08 OTS PUBNAT6 |
| | |
| | #354 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Jersey
Posts: 133
| I took the test on 7/7 in Holtsville and my score still isn't on there... did you find it on the main page or under "Test Information" ?
__________________ Summary of timeline 5/2-Applied to PUBNAT2 5/28-Authorized to take AT-SAT 6/30–Applied to PUBNAT4 7/14-Scored 93.8 on ATSAT "Well Qualified" 7/31–Applied to PUBNAT5 8/29–Applied to PUBNAT6 |
| | |
| | #355 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 100
| (In the order we took them in OKC, as best I remember!) Math: 20-25 min (20-30 questions) Dials: 10-20 min (30-40ish questions?) Angles: 10-20 min (30-40ish questions?) (15 min break) Scan Test: 30-40 min Letter Factory: 45-60min (lunch) AT Scenarios: 60-75min (15 min break) Analogies: 25-35min (20-30ish questions?) Personality: 15-30min (like 100 questions) I'll probably get chewed out for not having this in the AT-SAT section.. so, I'm prepared. AND - CONGRATULATIONS ON ALL THE HIGH SCORES!!! I was about to strangle someone for mine, checking the site obsessively, but they came ![]()
__________________ Applied PUBNAT 2,4,5 7/02/08: AT-SAT-OKC, 97.3% 8/04/08: Geo Prefs - KS/MO .... Hoping for the next step before 06/09/2014 |
| | |
| | #356 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Houston
Posts: 86
| No, I'm much lower...
__________________ 05/02/08 - Applied OTS 06/23/08 - AT-SAT "Qualified" ![]() 08/04/08 - Geo. Preferences (TX & PR) |
| | |
| | #357 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Lagrange
Posts: 251
| Quote:
__________________ 05/02- OTS App. #2 05/28- AT SAT approved 06/16- AT SAT email 06/30- OTS App. #4 07/09- At SAT test date 07/14- At SAT score 100 07/17- OTS App. #5 08/11- GEO PREF. (GA,TN) 08/18- OTS App. #6 | |
| | |
| | #358 | ||
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Tampa
Posts: 36
| Quote:
Quote:
From what I understand, every section gives you a time limit but you can finish early...with the exception of the Scan and ATC scenarios...where it's a straight timer till you're done? Also... on the practice CD, the ATC scenarios...I like hit the direction buttons like 9 times with my mouse or the commands or speed or altitude, etc...does it penalize you for multiple clicks (i do it to ensure the command goes through)?
__________________ | ||
| | |
| | #359 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Lagrange
Posts: 251
| Quote:
__________________ 05/02- OTS App. #2 05/28- AT SAT approved 06/16- AT SAT email 06/30- OTS App. #4 07/09- At SAT test date 07/14- At SAT score 100 07/17- OTS App. #5 08/11- GEO PREF. (GA,TN) 08/18- OTS App. #6 | |
| | |
| | #360 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Tampa
Posts: 36
| Sooo...has anyone come to a conclusion on what to do if you have lots of planes and no room... do you run them in circles... or run them up/down & left/right? I've kinda tried both...not sure which i like more...
__________________ |
| | |
| | #361 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Victorville
Posts: 194
| Quote:
![]()
__________________ 05/02/08 OTS PUBNAT2 05/28/08 Eligible for ATSAT 05/30/08 OTS PUBNAT3 07/08/08 AT-SAT 07/10/08 AT-SAT Score 100 07/31/08 OTS PUBNAT5 08/04/08 geo Preference (CA, AZ) 08/18/08 OTS PUBNAT6 | |
| | |
| | #362 | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: NN, VA
Posts: 60
| Quote:
The ones landing at the airports get put into a traffic pattern around the airfield. The ones getting handed off get vectors in the direction they need to go. If targets are going to cross paths put them at different altitudes. Duh? ![]()
__________________ 7/1/08 -AT-SAT 7/7/08 -Well Qualified And we wait.. | |
| | |
| | #363 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 565
| Whatever you want to do... the goal is to get them off the screen (landing or handing off) as quickly as possible while minimizing separation errors and crashes...
__________________ 05/02/2008 - PUBNAT2 05/28/2008 - Authorized to take AT-SAT 06/09/2008 - AT-SAT e-mail 07/14/2008 - AT-SAT date (NY) 07/15/2008 - AT-SAT score (91.5%) 08/04/2008 - Geo pref e-mail (NJ) |
| | |
| | #364 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Dallas (Plano, really)
Posts: 611
| Totally going off memory here, but wasn't one of the other "scoring assumptions" that you use the most efficient route (quickest)?
__________________ 2/08 Applied OTS 3/08 AT-SAT (90.8) ![]() 5/08 Geo Pref (ARTCC & Terminal - TX & GA) 6/08 Selected for ZFW (Fort Worth ARTCC) ![]() 8/08 Chicago PEPC - TOL in hand (Age is frozen! )
|
| | |
| | #365 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: NN, VA
Posts: 60
| Safe, orderly, and expeditious. Keep them separated either laterally or vertically, put them in a pattern around the airfield to sequence them, handle handoffs quickly and get them to their destination without undue delay (don't decrease speed unless necessary, give the most direct vectors).
__________________ 7/1/08 -AT-SAT 7/7/08 -Well Qualified And we wait.. |
| | |
| | #366 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Lagrange
Posts: 251
| ![]()
__________________ 05/02- OTS App. #2 05/28- AT SAT approved 06/16- AT SAT email 06/30- OTS App. #4 07/09- At SAT test date 07/14- At SAT score 100 07/17- OTS App. #5 08/11- GEO PREF. (GA,TN) 08/18- OTS App. #6 |
| | |
| | #367 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Lagrange
Posts: 251
| Has anyone who tested in Peachtree City gotten their scores back yet?
__________________ 05/02- OTS App. #2 05/28- AT SAT approved 06/16- AT SAT email 06/30- OTS App. #4 07/09- At SAT test date 07/14- At SAT score 100 07/17- OTS App. #5 08/11- GEO PREF. (GA,TN) 08/18- OTS App. #6 |
| | |
| | #368 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: wisconsin
Posts: 1
| Anybody who took the test in Chicago (lisle) get their scores back yet? Took it on 7-3 and haven't seen anything. |
| | |
| | #369 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 17
| Quote:
Also, one more quick note, you need to click on the plan icon itself to select it, not the data block.
__________________ 05.02.08 PUBNAT2 05.28.08 AT-SAT acceptance 06.30.08 PUBNAT4 07.10.08 AT-SAT test (NY) 07.17.08 AT-SAT well-qualified | |
| | |
| | #370 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Boise
Posts: 12
| Anyone else take the test in Seattle on 7/2? I just got the results posted yesterday (7/10) & scored 100%! Anyone know exactly what happens from here??? Thanks! |
| | |
| | #371 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 26
| I took mine on the 8th in PTC. Still waiting................
__________________ 5/02 - PUBNAT2 6/16 - AT-SAT email 7/8 - AT-SAT 93% Well Qualified 8/13 - Geo Prefs War Eagle! |
| | |
| | #372 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 26
| Quote:
I had lots of fun on this one. I didn't crash any but when one comes close, there is a big red marker that happens right before it does. That is a separation error and I'm sure not as bad as a crash. If it's going to an exit just drop him down one. If its one that is about to land just have him go the opposite direction until the red goes away. I had that when one was coming in to land S1 and one behind at M1 on accident. I just turned him around until the other landed. They turn around before it refreshes. The last section I had, I had 2 planes left one about to land and one about to exit with one more refresh to go. Hopefully that helps my poor analogies score out. It was annoying to have words that had no relation except for the way it sounded. I guessed on alot of them...
__________________ 5/02 - PUBNAT2 6/16 - AT-SAT email 7/8 - AT-SAT 93% Well Qualified 8/13 - Geo Prefs War Eagle! | |
| | |
| | #373 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Columbus
Posts: 14
| Ok I'm gonna take this opportunity to "stir the pot" a little ![]() In this fantasy world of atc forums... I think we can all agree that a LOT of people have been rocking the ATSAT with 100%'s... while it's not at all my prerogative to be judgmental towards any single member, I do wonder to myself... how many of the ATC forum members totally BS their scores? While most of them are probably legit... I can't help but think of that Brad Paisley song "So much cooler online"... (edited for us... sing along) Oh, online, I aced my AT-SAT Well qualified, make sure you know that, Cause even on my first day, I could handle IFR, with 30 pilots at one time, I'm so much cooler online ![]() Vindictive? Crass? Bitter? Maybe a little bit of them all... all I know is that after my piss-poor ATSAT showing (83.2), if I don't get hired by the FAA, I'm seriously contemplating opening up a real letter factory... maybe with campbell's soup company... sadly... children everywhere will be sorely upset when they can only make words like "BAD", "CAB", and "ADD". Yeah... alphabet soup land is gonna get pretty flippin' boring my friends... Nextly, I hope that someday the FAA can put the ATSAT into practical use... maybe start making controllers talk to pilot's while only using analogies... "Cessna 421, Approach, Benign is to night, as viscosity is to..." Or maybe while a controller is trying to assist with an engine out... a little voice will come over the radio saying "All radio communications have been suspended until you can tell me how this triangle with 5 million stripes going 3 different ways would translate if it were to translate like the given example of the circle with 3 millions stripes going 5 ways... sorry, sir, your answer is incorrect, your engine-out aircraft has now exploded because of your ineptitude... have a nice day" Point being, ATC is a highly stressful job that not everyone is cut out for. But to base even the chance to be trained as one off a score... I think is a little bogus. I hope they dig into the applications to try and give each applicant the whole-person concept as opposed to just a number and a score... but hey... it is the gov't we're dealing with here... they're the double edged sword that we love to hate yet hate to leave... Clear skies and tailwinds, all |
| | |
| | #374 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 17
| That has got to be the best post I have ever read!
__________________ 05.02.08 PUBNAT2 05.28.08 AT-SAT acceptance 06.30.08 PUBNAT4 07.10.08 AT-SAT test (NY) 07.17.08 AT-SAT well-qualified |
| | |
| | #375 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Victorville
Posts: 194
| The fact that you couldn't leave a plane after you clicked on it without giving it directions was screwing me up too. I crashed at least 3 planes I can remember and had tons of seperational errors, mostly with walls as I got used to jeremy justices game, where I was using the wall basically as a flight path. Also had a few errors for landing planes at too fast a speed. This kept happening as I was trying to leave them going the fastest possible until the last minute, then I would be stuck on another plane when the one landed at fast speed. I left having thought I bombed the test, so was totally surprised to see that I scored 100. I think that the scoring methods on the letter factory and scenarios must be pretty liberal.
__________________ 05/02/08 OTS PUBNAT2 05/28/08 Eligible for ATSAT 05/30/08 OTS PUBNAT3 07/08/08 AT-SAT 07/10/08 AT-SAT Score 100 07/31/08 OTS PUBNAT5 08/04/08 geo Preference (CA, AZ) 08/18/08 OTS PUBNAT6 |
| | |