View Single Post
Old September 19th, 2008, 11:50   #19
Firebird2XC
Old Skool
 
Firebird2XC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: *ATTENDING NetworkJC '09
Posts: 4,366
Default Re: Why "1000 hrs Turbine PIC" Is Bad For Pilots

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyChicaga View Post
You do realize it is flight operations management working in conjunction with human resources that sets the minimums, correct? I'm not sure if the financial types at most airlines have any idea what the minimums are at the ground level. Also, I'd argue that it is the management at the regional level which is pushing down wages... Management at the majors just looks at what it will cost to run feed, and could care less how the regionals get their rates to a competitve level. It is only when you see a drop in productivity and safety that the majors step in and question costs.

The "1000 PIC" requirement is more to filter out applications than anything else. Most companies with that requirement hire with a lot more than 1000 PIC.

No offense, but I think we all need to look in the mirror a bit and take personal responsibility for the wages we have. After all, we took the job, and we knew the pay. That's why regional pilots are our own worst enemy.
So what you're saying is, "blindly chasing what we think will get us to the majors while ignoring the pay and QOL we have in the process is the big mistake we make", right?

In that case, we agree.
Firebird2XC is offline   Reply With Quote