Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDDuck  Umm... No?
In his preliminary finding he said that, but in the final issuance he said the PNCL Holdings was not governed by the contract between 9EALPA and PNCL Airlines.
Or at least that's what I thought. |
Ditto what PCL said. It was VERY confusing when the amended arbitration award came out, and the MEC was seeking clarification. That got put on the back burner when contract negotiations suddenly surged forward since any scope clause negotiated with a new contract would null and void the arbitrator's ruling anyway. Now that negotiations have stalled out again, I'd expect them to turn the heat back up on getting this clarified. Basically, the arbitrator said "You're in violation, but you don't have to do anything about it" which makes no sense.