View Single Post
Old August 1st, 2008, 15:28   #20
ATN_Pilot
Old Skool
 
ATN_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ATL
Posts: 6,048
Default Re: Colgan/Pinnacle Seniority List Merger Question

CAPIP, a single transportation system is a completely different issue. That only becomes the issue if ALPA were to file a single carrier petition. To the best of my knowledge, ALPA has no plans to do so and hasn't even begun to work on legal paperwork that would be needed for such a filing. This isn't about that. The PCL contract contains scope language that deals with this. A single-carrier petition isn't necessary to enforce scope language. The arbitrator has already ruled that PCL Corp. is in violation of the scope clause, but the ruling on the remedy was ambiguous, so ALPA is looking for a clarification from the arbitrator. Single carrier filings and single transportation systems have absolutely nothing to do with scope language.
__________________


ATN_Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote